It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cyrus
if iran, is attacked, then russia wont stand for it,
there's enough russian arsenal in iran to send all your troops to hell YOU MORON, do you realize what you're saying???
ON WITH THE WAR time to teach pro-war f**kers a lesson.
Cyrus
Originally posted by andy1033
Iran is just playing into americas hands. i am sure the situation is exactly how america planned it.
Originally posted by Leveller
Originally posted by Cyrus
if iran, is attacked, then russia wont stand for it,
there's enough russian arsenal in iran to send all your troops to hell YOU MORON, do you realize what you're saying???
ON WITH THE WAR time to teach pro-war f**kers a lesson.
Cyrus
All very well and good, that bit of patriotism, but I fear that your comments about Russian intervention are pretty unfounded to say the least.
not really...who are you to say anyway
The Russian military machine is washed up. Budget cuts have nearly destroyed it, morale is at it's lowest ever and the arms race with the US, which provided it with much of it's technical know how, is over.
Russia would have a hard time mounting any military operation outside of her own borders now. She was at the height of her powers against Afghanistan but couldn't even handle that scenario. If it wasn't for Russia's nuclear capability, she would be insignificant as a military force.
raising an "unfounded" argument?? russian military is catching up with the U.S'es, our tanks JUMP damnit, we have the best anti-stealth technology on earth, and you know what really sux?? we sell it at 1/5th of the price the americans sell their crap for, can you take a wild guess why the U.S felt inclined to offer to buy some of our ICBM's
technical know-how is booming, we're currently loading up on new-generation scientists, guess what?? american scientsts *cough* *cough* OUR trained scientists sent to the U.S after the U.S.S.R's fall are running out of ideas, it's always been the russians at the tip of technology...i dont see why they should be backing down, money wont make too big a difference, money affects the time-span in which the projects are completed, however plans and ideas can always be worked out.
WAR benefits all, russia's economy, will retrieve it's fullness by 2010, the military will have superior training, plans are currently being made for all of this, and providing we have putin, then all is well.
russia's "nuclear capability" you make it sound like we're sending age-old ww2 rockets... well, our nuclear capability might be the biggest in the world for all you know, i dont either so let's leave it at that
AND the anti-stealth capability is enough to defeat any stealth bombers today (even the x-47 can be spotted with not too much difficulty).
russia, then china, are the biggest threat to the U.S today...if you dont agree then i see no point in continuing with you on this matter.
But all that is a moot point. If you're actually as Russian as you claim to be (I have my doubts), then you would be aware that Islamic extremism is even more of a problem to Russia than it is to the countries in the West. The extremist factions border Russia and some even sit within her borders in Chechnya. Russia isn't going to get into a war defending her enemies - especially as she now relies economically on the capatilist societies to keep her stable.
hmm....you shrug it off as moot? why'd you include it in the post then, or is that all you got on russia...shows how well-informed you really are doesnt it
and guess what Leveller, i dont care if you think i'm a god-damned ukranian or whatever, i'm not scanning on any of my personal info on here if that's what you mean, so uh... was a pretty useless comment to make as well?? (i might think you're a mullah, only i dont really bloody care now do i??)
actually...it isn't a problem to russia as much as the U.S would be once it became russia's close neighbour, NATO from one side? the U.S from the other? can you see where this might be going?
Any invasion of Iran is going to be treated the same way as that of Iraq. There will be more vocal opposition sure, but nobody is going to care. The whole region wants to see the back of the mad mullahs.
you're delusional...the whole region was fine till the AMERS showed up
It's doubtful that invasion will be needed though. The whole point of the invasion of Iraq was to set up a stable government with a form of democracy acceptable to the masses. If Iraq does turn into a success story, eventually, revolution in Iran is almost a certainty.
Originally posted by Satyr
Originally posted by andy1033
Iran is just playing into americas hands. i am sure the situation is exactly how america planned it.
Yeah, right.
Originally posted by andy1033
Originally posted by Satyr
Originally posted by andy1033
Iran is just playing into americas hands. i am sure the situation is exactly how america planned it.
Yeah, right.
"Satyr" are you one of those that think everything happens by accident.
Originally posted by andy1033
"Satyr" are you one of those that think everything happens by accident.
No. I'm one of those who thinks the gov't is comprised of evil bastards with alot of power and not much sense.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
actually, every1 keeps missing satyr's point.
i'm backing him up (if i understand him correctly).
9/11 occured, despite the U.S'es being informed, who disagrees? *silence*
I do. Please show me proof that we knew their exact methods, times. and targets. Don't tell me that we had specific intell on the day, targets, etc.
Originally posted by Satyr
Originally posted by COOL HAND
actually, every1 keeps missing satyr's point.
i'm backing him up (if i understand him correctly).
9/11 occured, despite the U.S'es being informed, who disagrees? *silence*
I do. Please show me proof that we knew their exact methods, times. and targets. Don't tell me that we had specific intell on the day, targets, etc.
No fighter jets were scrambled, from what I've heard. You don't find that a bit suspicious? We've all seen hijackings before, and they have jets flying beside them almost immediately. And what about the plane full of Islamics that was allowed to leave, and quickly escorted out of the US?
[Edited on 4-6-2004 by Satyr]
Originally posted by Cyrus
the american empire
has already been defeated, the people in iraq are rebelling, time to relax, rip open a can of beer, and watch the show.
face it AMER, the U.S just wont win any wars,(you may win battles...i.e afghanistan, iraq) but it simply wont happen, GB or not
i am a russian, pro-war rubes disgust me,
this is just getting ridiculous, you people just wont learn will you??
ON WITH THE WAR time to teach pro-war f**kers a lesson.
Cyrus
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Cyrus,
!. Link does not work for me.
2. You said it yourself, it listed airports as potential targets. Now maybe I missed that on 9-11 but there were no airports that were hit.
what r u high? *pass us some* how the hell do you think the ragheads got on the damn planes...OSMOSIS???
I say again, show me the evidence that proves that we knew the what, where, when, and how. I have repeatedly asked that question since I first came to the site and have yet to get a solid answer for it.