It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Making inmates pay for food

page: 15
12
<< 12  13  14   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 02:52 PM
link   
Seriously. Pexx? I can understand where you're coming from with having nutritious food and appropriate nutrients and vitamins as opposed to calories. Obviously, (and I'm sure you can vouch for this) the reason the food industry markets processed food is to save money. It's not exactly in the best interest of the consumer but rather the merchant. And the undesirable effects that result from metabolizing said processed food can be countered with medication and treatment. Which brings business for the medical industry. I do agree with your stance on that. Some things have to change.

But when it comes down to prison inmates? I feel that they should work to obtain food whether it be nutritious or not. I have to do the same thing on the outside and I am a law-abiding citizen with no criminal record whatsoever. Health and wellness is a personal responsibility. NOT a right. That's fair treatment.



posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by titorite
The sheriff in this case is INSANE! He feeds the accused twice a day.

Now he wants to make them pay for what little food he does choose to give them. This counties sheriffs department has not been involved in litigation SINCE THE 70s because the sheriff is doing good job. No the contrary is true. And I would bet that if the citizens of the country shifted their focus and investigated their elections they would probably find that the sheriff stuffs the boxes.

Just one question for you the reader here and now.

Do you eat twice a day?

Your criminal record has no bearing here just the answer, do you only eat two meals a day?


Some people eat six small meals per day.

But do I eat twice a day? Maybe. Approximately two or three times.



posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 03:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Marked One

But do I eat twice a day? Maybe. Approximately two or three times.


Yeah yeah yeah and some people fast and some people are gluttons but I did not ask an open ended question. I asked a yes or no question.

Do you eat two meals a day? Yes or No? No snacks, no cokes, no anything else. Do you eat two meals a day?

[edit on 26-12-2008 by titorite]



posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 03:08 PM
link   
In that case? Yes. What's your point?



posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Marked One
 


My point is free man you lie. Your asking me and everyone else to believe you have two meals a day and you don't snack, You don't fill up on soda, you don't have a third meal you only eat two meals a day.

In your first reply it was a maybe followed by an approximation of two to three meals.

Did your eating habits change in the two seconds it took you to reply? I doubt it.



posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 04:29 PM
link   
inmates should pay for their food.
pay a deductible for dr visits
pay for clothing



posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 05:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by titorite
reply to post by Marked One
 


My point is free man you lie. Your asking me and everyone else to believe you have two meals a day and you don't snack, You don't fill up on soda, you don't have a third meal you only eat two meals a day.

In your first reply it was a maybe followed by an approximation of two to three meals.

Did your eating habits change in the two seconds it took you to reply? I doubt it.


Did your IQ drop sharply while I was away? I'm not answering any more of your trick questions. You're not making any sense. You're just equivocating a filibuster.



posted on Dec, 26 2008 @ 06:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by mrsdudara

Originally posted by resistor
I have not allowed that experience to cause me to believe that all doctors are murderers.


Neither do I. I do not see the point you are trying to make here.



Pour out your hate on those most convenient if you must, but know that you are doing yourself no favor. The solace you seek is within you, not in the punishment of those you know nothing of.


I pour my hate on those who deserve it. In all honesty though, I do not hate even a handful of people. Towards the prisoners who deserve to be in prison, I have no feelings what so ever.

I do not seek solace, I am not sorrowful. Sorry to disappoint you.


Well! We've found the messiah. The one human being on the planet that needs no solace. You must be very proud. Make that very deluded. No wonder you have no empathy for others, you have none for yourself.

reply to post by eyewitness86
 


You're probably right about what the law says, but there are many ways that prisons get around them. Tick off the wrong person in the Federal pen, and you'll get 'diesel therapy', where you're constantly shipped from one prison to the next, getting nothing but bologna sandwiches and being denied all communication with the 'free world'. Being locked in solitary is heaven compared to that.



posted on Dec, 27 2008 @ 10:36 PM
link   
In all seriousness. I understand all of your concerns. I do believe prison inmates can and will be mistreated. And as a result you're only fighting fire with fire. Instead of doing any actually reforming, you're only punishing. There's no comprehension involved. Just sheer punishment. And I do agree. That is wrong. There's a lot of work that needs to be done with the system in America. Not just America but in the rest of the world. As a dominant superpower we have to set an example for the rest of the world. It begins here.

On a separate note. I do not feel there is anything wrong with having inmates pay for their own food. If I have to do so on the outside world and I don't even have so much as a traffic violation on my record. Why not prison inmates inmates do the same? Food, TV, living arrangements, health-care etc. Are NOT a right. They are a personal responsibility. Now to some those particular things may be a right to an individual under a socialist regime. It may work in places like Canada, parts of Europe. But it won't work in America. If you have a good explanation as to why it WOULD work? Then explain away.

But my statements still stand. As to why they are in prison in the first place? That's a different topic all together. Some of the reasons people are in prison I don't agree with. And I don't agree with corrections officer's abusing the inmates. I also don't agree with inmates raping each other. Hurting each other. Stealing from each other. But there's not very much you or I alone can do to prevent it. But if it involves teaching prison inmates how to handle their own responsibilities while in prison in order for them to learn to do the same on the outside world on their own and be productive members of society and staying out of trouble? I am all for it.

As for everything else? The world isn't perfect. It never was. And it never will be. Period.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Marked One
 


You realize that you're talking about a 'company store' situation right? Wherein prisoners are locked into a debt spiral from which they can never extricate themselves. It's enslavement pure and simple, and those on the inside profit handsomely from it. Notice I used the present tense because it is happening now, just not to the extent you propose.

en.wikipedia.org...

I’m all for inmates doing all the maintenance on the prison they can, but for-profit ventures in prison set up a situation where it’s in the PTB best interest to keep the prisons as full as possible. In my mind this is the only reason the USA has more prisoners than China.

Please keep in mind that there are plenty of innocent people in USA prisons. 19 wrongly convicted people have been proven innocent out of Dallas County alone in the last few years.

www.cnn.com...

ipoftexas.org...

These are people the gov swore up and down could not possibly be innocent. There but for the grace of God go all of us.

edit for usual crap


[edit on 29-12-2008 by resistor]



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by resistor
reply to post by Marked One
 

Please keep in mind that there are plenty of innocent people in USA prisons. 19 wrongly convicted people have been proven innocent out of Dallas County alone in the last few years.
[edit on 29-12-2008 by resistor]


I do agree on this. I also recall instances where people are wrongly executed. There was this one instance where a man was convicted of murdering three police officers. It was actually his own father who was responsible for the murders and simply set everything up so his own son takes the fall for it. They didn't find out about this until after he was executed that his nephew along with other members of the family heard a confession from the man's father, explaining he was the actual murderer and not his son. When the son was executed his last words were something to the effect of "I maintain my innocence. God bless you."

Absolutely. These things do happen.

[edit on 12/29/08 by Marked One]



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by resistor
reply to post by Marked One
 


You realize that you're talking about a 'company store' situation right? Wherein prisoners are locked into a debt spiral from which they can never extricate themselves. It's enslavement pure and simple, and those on the inside profit handsomely from it. Notice I used the present tense because it is happening now, just not to the extent you propose.

en.wikipedia.org...


Yes. I have heard of this. Yet I still stand by what I say.

On a separate note. It is true. The one nation in the world with the largest prison population is the United States Of America. Former Soviet Union comes in second place. Third place is owned by South Africa.




top topics



 
12
<< 12  13  14   >>

log in

join