Evidence that Mumbai attacks were anglo-american operatives

Wow, I can't believe the stupidity I'm seeing here, you people obviously don't read a whole article or check the sources.

In the article it claims that the terrorists drank alcohol, that's taboo in islam, so they're not muslim, at least some of them aren't.

They are not only claimed to have "fair skin", but they are also claimed to have blonde hair and they were "foreign looking" (foreign to the Indians).

And for the morons who don't know how to click on links claiming there is no link to the BBC on infowars article HERE'S THE EFFING LINK!!!

news.bbc.co.uk...

So there ya go, so as we can see according to SOME eyewitnesses, there were non-muslim whites attacking too.

Geez people, quit acting so retarded.

-Lahara

reply to post by Merriman Weir





[edit on 28-11-2008 by Chance321]

Originally posted by TheRandom1
Wow, I can't believe the stupidity I'm seeing here, you people obviously don't read a whole article or check the sources.

In the article it claims that the terrorists drank alcohol, that's taboo in islam, so they're not muslim, at least some of them aren't.

I used to work with a muslim who would have the occasional drink.

And I dare you to tell her she is not a muslim.

They are not only claimed to have "fair skin", but they are also claimed to have blonde hair and they were "foreign looking" (foreign to the Indians).

This means what, to you? That they are obviously CIA operatives thinking that those backward unintelligent Indians would never cotton on that they're not quite 'right' for the job?

Does the fact that white muslims who have gone overseas to participate in terrorist activities elude you?

And for the morons who don't know how to click on links claiming there is no link to the BBC on infowars article HERE'S THE EFFING LINK!!!

news.bbc.co.uk...

So there ya go, so as we can see according to SOME eyewitnesses, there were non-muslim whites attacking too.

Geez people, quit acting so retarded.

-Lahara

Oh my, the irony...

Jeez, I think some of you need to get out more or at least integrate with your fellow man more.

Since when has religion been part of a persons colour? There are white, black, yellow, red, brown and every other colour in-between Christians - the same for every other major religion in this world Islam is no different.

I work alongside many people of different nationalities, religions and colour every single day of the week and I cannot tell you is what nationality they are or what religion they practice - without me being nosey and asking them outright.

I know many muslims who drink alcohol - they just dont admit to their parents that they do.

Try going to places like Tunisia or Turkey and you will see loads of muslims there that drink alcohol. Incidently, speaking of these two nations, if you have been there you will notice 'locals' of all 'shades' of colours as well as blond hair and blue eyes. There is NO stereotypical terrorist.

Originally posted by TheRandom1
Wow, I can't believe the stupidity I'm seeing here, you people obviously don't read a whole article or check the sources.

In the article it claims that the terrorists drank alcohol, that's taboo in islam, so they're not muslim, at least some of them aren't.

They are not only claimed to have "fair skin", but they are also claimed to have blonde hair and they were "foreign looking" (foreign to the Indians).

You might want to avoid accusing people of stupidity or being retarded, when you seem to think that Muslims are incapable of breaking tenants of their faith or there is no such thing as fair-skinned, blonde Muslims.

Originally posted by TheRandom1
Wow, I can't believe the stupidity I'm seeing here, you people obviously don't read a whole article or check the sources.

In the article it claims that the terrorists drank alcohol, that's taboo in islam, so they're not muslim, at least some of them aren't.

They are not only claimed to have "fair skin", but they are also claimed to have blonde hair and they were "foreign looking" (foreign to the Indians).

And for the morons who don't know how to click on links claiming there is no link to the BBC on infowars article HERE'S THE EFFING LINK!!!

news.bbc.co.uk...

So there ya go, so as we can see according to SOME eyewitnesses, there were non-muslim whites attacking too.

Geez people, quit acting so retarded.

-Lahara

you have some cheek calling people retarded with a post like that

* clearly Muslims are human and capable of sin or not conforming to the norm, hence some Muslims drink (as in Turkey, Albania etc)- and we appear to have Muslims in UK prisons, presumably they committed some crimes as they are human, NOT JUST muslim

* As for "proof" that they were foreign, well we dont have proof just one dude who reckons he saw a blonde fella, how reliable this person is God only knows

* Indians come in many hues and colours, and many Muslims in Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan etc are whiter then you would imagine

Open your mind before looking down at others with your "retard" comments

I don’t think that the race of the attackers is of much importance, really. It’s patently obvious that a war in Pakistan is on the agenda of the western powers, and that we’re seeing ‘terrorist’ acts to prepare the common folk to accept it. The fires weren’t even out before Pakistan was being blamed. Obvious false flag op IMO.

Originally posted by TheRandom1
Wow, I can't believe the stupidity I'm seeing here, you people obviously don't read a whole article or check the sources.

In the article it claims that the terrorists drank alcohol, that's taboo in islam, so they're not muslim, at least some of them aren't.

They are not only claimed to have "fair skin", but they are also claimed to have blonde hair and they were "foreign looking" (foreign to the Indians).

And for the morons who don't know how to click on links claiming there is no link to the BBC on infowars article HERE'S THE EFFING LINK!!!

news.bbc.co.uk...

So there ya go, so as we can see according to SOME eyewitnesses, there were non-muslim whites attacking too.

Geez people, quit acting so retarded.

-Lahara

Pot, kettle, black.

Mohammed Atta of 9-11 fame...along with some of his fellow attackers, patronized strip clubs the weekend prior to that fateful Tuesday morning.

Secondly, the US miliatary has captured American citizens fighting alongside the Islamic jihadists. Try googling the name Adam Yehiye Gadahn,

I think you're naive and/or obtuse.
You decide.

Originally posted by MischeviousElf
Ok forget infowars and flaming,

I think this thread has been hijacked a bit, anyhow:

British-born Pakistanis among arrested militants

The evidense is now overwhelming, and I think the idea of any cover up or conspiracy as I posted on this thread earlier is daft, the radicalisation of these youths has been seen in places in the UK like finsbury park mosque etc.

I dont except the official story of the tube bombings, but this seems just like radicalised British nationals, and no links to the USA.

I truly think this thread has been derailed so here is one for anyone wanting to see proper sources, lots of info as it breaks and discuss without flaming what is really happening:

Mumbai attack "British Men Among Terrorists"

Lots of sources are showing this and its not infowars or Pale skinned terrorist either!

Elf.

[edit on 28-11-2008 by MischeviousElf]

reply to post by checkitb4uwreckit


Indias Terror Attacks - Indias 9/11, paving the way for an Attack on Pakistan
www.abovetopsecret.com...

This is just a bunch of BS. Its become standard operating procedure. Something bad happens some place else Blame America. Some one dies Horribly What do ya do Blame America.

All that does is take focus off the real tragedy. America is not perfect, nor are we the reason for all the worlds ills. Why on earth would you try to take the focus off the poor people who have suffered over there. you really should be ashamed of your self.

[edit on 28-11-2008 by angryamerican]

reply to post by checkitb4uwreckit


I agree the terrorists in this attack could have not been colored men but that doesn't necessarily mean that they were american. Does white mean american these days? The heading of this thread is very deceiving and if there are anyways to change the header it would be much appreciated.

Originally posted by resistor
I don’t think that the race of the attackers is of much importance, really. It’s patently obvious that a war in Pakistan is on the agenda of the western powers, and that we’re seeing ‘terrorist’ acts to prepare the common folk to accept it. The fires weren’t even out before Pakistan was being blamed. Obvious false flag op IMO.

You speak with a profound ignorance of Pakistani-Indian relations. They have fought several wars since the seperation of the two countries in 1946, and terrorists have killed nearly 3,600 people in India since 2003. India's knee-jerk reaction blaming Pakistan is not because of manipulation by Western powers, but due to the history between the two nations.

Originally posted by Lokey13
I agree the terrorists in this attack could have not been colored men but that doesn't necessarily mean that they were american. Does white mean american these days?

In the bigoted, racist worldview of Alex Jones and his army of unthinking, ignorant automatons, yes.

Some of you folks read to much of the standard M1 a media propaganda...brainwashing.

When I went to school for the Air Force down in Keesler AFB, Mississippi..there were alot of Iranians there sent by the Shah. They were not supposed to socialize with American women, have cars, or drink Alcohol. Guess what...they socialized with American women, drank alcohol, and pooled their moneys to buy a car so that they could do all three of these things. But with their public face they denied all of this stuff on religious grounds.

Lets try this one if any of you have a memory sufficiently of length and history.

"I did not have sex with that girl"

Under what religion was that statement made??

In Europe many muslims, in the daytime, are following around the European women and calling them whores and sluts...but at night they go into them to occupy their time and passions. Was it not the same with some of the 9/11 hijackers??

Some of you need to think past the official rhetoric. There are muslims from Europe with European habits and customs..blended in with their religion. The English and French have discovered this facet...it is not stationary old school anymore. The fear for some years now is that they are recruiting Europeans who cannot fit the physical profile of the standard muslim.

Nonetheless...try thinking and asking questions outside the box of what passes for much of public news and information.

Thanks,
Orangetom

Its incredible how people hijack the word ignorance on this site, its like a certain syndrome to bend reality because reality as we see it on media is ignorant [in their eyes]..FIrst of all if the terrorist would come from Pakistan[what would be the suggestion in a false flag or not], that wouldn't give them a fiat to invade Pakistan on a large scale, Pakistan even wanted a hotline between the 2 countries, and is after all still an ally of the West..the government that is..
really i am stupified by the "breaking news stories" over here sometimes..

[edit on 28-11-2008 by Foppezao]

reply to post by TheRandom1


Gotta love how some people consider Muslims as robots all molded out of one mold. Then go on to call others morons for thinking of Muslims as human beings. Yes, random1, there are Muslims who are white skinned with blonde hair, and even some who drink the occasional alcoholic drink. Until there is actual evidence of this supposed "false flag" operation, then it doesn't exist. People like you are the rumor mongerers who latch onto the smallest thing and try to divert everyone's attention away from reality towards your self generated fantasy world.

I've been reading many posts here and elsewhere throughout the last 60hrs or 80hrs I don't know. But what lacks in most posts is understanding.

It's truly amazing how everyone is talking about terroism, the media says al-qaida in every 2 seconds for years and it's incredible how throughout all this talking, news reportion and opinion giving that they NEVER speak of the cause of terroism.

Why is that? How come it never crosses everyone's mind that they don't know why terroism exists yet, how come people can so easily be convinced that there's super crazy people out there ready to bomb themselves out of religious fanaticism.

We are all humans, every human has the same fears as we do, as you do.

But we must first speak of the cause of terroism. The cause is foreign occupation, global oppression, the foreign policy and having to much influence in foreign governments(puppet govts.)

Please look at this video
www.youtube.com...


How can we stop terroism?
1) Understanding
2) Empathy


These are the first steps required to stop terroism. It is no secret that there is a war on Islam and they are being treated unfairly. I am Hindu Punjabi by the way if you are wondering.

How would we feel if we were in their place?
First you have to educate yourself on getting a clear understanding of what their place is.
And only then can you make an attempt of empathy.

Iraqi insurgents. The media referred to them as terroists. But what is an insurgent?
An Insurgent is someone who fights of invaders because he doesn't want them in their country.

If U.S. wasn't the all powerful U.S.A but a muslim country was instead the all-powerful, and muslims troops invaded the U.S., you think there would be no American Insurgents?

Stop believing the lies of the media.

And I understand that while I say this, theres muslims out there that try to destroy my theory by saying Islam this, Islam that, Islam this blab balbalblabllba.
These are idiots, the world is full of them, but they aren't terroists.
They are just idiots with no guts to bomb themselves or pick up an AK-47.


Understanding, and Empathy!

reply to post by SaviorComplex


Ya we americans are responsible for everything, great choice of words savior.

There is a BIG difference between British born Pakistani's and CIA false flag ops. Why is everyone so quick to blame the US?

By Jon Swaine Last Updated: 1:49PM GMT 28 Nov 2008 Two British-born Pakistanis were among eight gunmen seized by Indian commandos who stormed buildings to free hostages, Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister of Mumbai, reportedly said. The Foreign Office earlier said it was investigating reports on NDTV, a local television news channel, that the terrorists - who swarmed luxury hotels and other tourist sites in the city - included "British citizens of Pakistani origin"

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Maybe it was the same cell as the 9/11 hijackers

The US is already hitting targets in Pakistan folks, there is no need to pull a false flag op. Remember, one of the guys who assisted in killing 3000 Americans is hiding there......