It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You can bring any of it up... just keep in mind that most of it would just make you sound stupid to anyone who is not a hard-core GOPer, and that your guy has plenty in his past too. As I said in another thread, if you want the politics of personal distruction? We can do "scorched earth" that turns Johnnie into a crispy critter.
Originally posted by RRconservative
Originally posted by justyc
politicians should just be banned from mentioning the opponent or opposition before elections. they should just stick to talking about what THEY are going to do if they get in (and be held accountable for it if they do get in).
WOW!
It's amazing how quick people are ready to throw out the 1st Amendment when it effects their favorite candidate.
It's amazing how many things you can't say about Obama.
1. Can't mention his former pastor and mentor, Reverand Wright.
2. Can't mention his middle name is Hussein.
3. Can't mention his questionable Muslim roots.
4. Can't mention he is one of the most liberal Senators.
5. Can't mention that he voted for infanticide.
6. Can't mention that he is closely associated with terrorist Bill Ayers.
7. Can't mention how he worked out a deal with slum-lord Bill Rezko to obtain his mansion.
8. Can't mention he has big ears....just ask Maureen Dowd.
9. Can't mention the possibility that he is not a natural born citizen, and is not eligible to run for President.
10. Can't mention his lack of experience.
11. Can't mention that he tried to legislate defeat in Iraq.
This is just right off the top of my head....I could go on and on.
There are so many things about Obama that are "off-limits", then you have the spector of racism if you disagree with him.
If Obama refuses to address these mysterious issues about him, how can you blame the public from forming opinions that may or may not be correct?
Originally posted by justyc
politicians should just be banned from mentioning the opponent or opposition before elections. they should just stick to talking about what THEY are going to do if they get in (and be held accountable for it if they do get in).
Originally posted by whatsup
I just hope that blacks will be energized to go out and vote for Obama ...and here we sit in the 95% Christian US still firmly entrenched in the same hypocritical racism and hatred after all these years.
Originally posted by grover
... second, I don't know what has happened to the person in question but if the SS was doing their job that day they would have retained him for questioning because it is an implicit threat against a candidate... and they are supposed to be protecting both of them.
Originally posted by grover
It will be a sad and pathetic commentary about our country if the election comes down to ....
Originally posted by grover
and I am not going to waste my vote by either sitting it out or going 3rd party. I did that in 80 and I will not vote 3rd party again unless they have an actual chance of winning.
I'm voting for Baldwin . Ron Paul endorsed him and when i went to the website I discovered that I like where he stands on most things (not all - but most). Also - he isn't a flip flopping mess like Obama and McCain are. He isn't a back door socialist like McCain and a front-door racist socialist like Obama.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
In modern US politics, it is one of the very few absolutely unacceptable behaviors to threaten, or even appear to threaten, a president or presidential candidate.
For this kind of behavior to be happening at McCain/Palin rallies,
Originally posted by grover
the very fact that he has gotten this far is magnificent and historic.... same is true for women...
I am not going to waste my vote by either sitting it out or going 3rd party.