It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
By majority decision, this debate goes to....ThroatYogurt!
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Show some evidence to debate me. Stop being immature and name calling.
Either show some actual evindece to debate me or do not bother posting to me.
Problem is i am in the process of getting a document that will prove beyond a doubt that i have won that deabte. This document would even hold up in court, something your so called evidence would not do.
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
he has explained the document.
It is a report from the NSA that states 93 was intercepted. Ultima claims to have seen it.
He is not telling the truth. Check out the thread he started about it. First he posts a link to a crack pot dude... then like a week later he starts to say that HE saw it.
Pure BS and he knows it.
Originally posted by exponent
If you don't believe the aircraft debris pictures posted are real, perhaps you can explain what exactly happened in order for them to be in the photographs.
This will be fantastic to see, can we have your word that you will either get or explain what this document is and show us?
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
He is not telling the truth.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Please show me or explain where i ever stated the pictuire are not real.
I have already shown that i have sent an FOIA request to get the document.
You verify and call the number and ask if i have requested the document and the document does exist.
Then you must post a thread and apologize to me for calling me a liar, and state that the official story has been shown to be wrong on this event.
Originally posted by exponent
If these pictures are real, then they show quite a lot of airplane debris at the impact site at the pentagon.
I have not read that, and have just read through most of the thread about your NSA certifications. I must say if you are an NSA employee that is quite a shock to me, but until you produce the evidence of this document it means relatively little.
I would be happy to phone and ask for details,
I'm not calling you a liar, just wondering exactly what you've requested, and why your manner seems so strange for an NSA employee.
Originally posted by exponent
If you don't believe the aircraft debris pictures posted are real, perhaps you can explain what exactly happened in order for them to be in the photographs.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Can you read and understand basic sentences? Do you have prove that the debris from the pictures are from AA77, YES or NO,, its that simple.
I am going to produce the document. But then its just the matter of most believers will just ignore it as they have any other evidence shown that questions the official media story.
But you could verify the office and verify that i have requested an actual document.
Originally posted by tezzajw
No, it doesn't work like that, exponent.
If you're making the claim that an airliner crashed at the Pentagon, then you're the one who has to prove that the alleged wreckage belongs to that specific airliner.
Originally posted by exponent
No, of course I don't.
Well I look forward to its release.
I could, but unless the request contains information about the verified contents of the document, it would hardly prove anything. .
Originally posted by exponent
Ah. Well in that case I suspect we might be waiting quite a while. I'd like you to prove me wrong ULTIMA. Please do.
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
This is the guy that stated that an F-4 Phantom fighter jet was mostly made of steel,
Originally posted by exponent
AA77 vanished that day, as did all the people on it.
Their DNA was found in the Pentagon, along with personal effects and the FDR of AA77. The flight manifest of AA77 included people also featured in martyrdom videos regarding the attack on the Pentagon.
This is all good evidence to believe AA77 crashed at the Pentagon. Further evidence comes in the form of eyewitness accounts of AA jets impacting the Pentagon, eyewitness accounts of corpses strapped into airline seats. The list just goes on and on.
Do you have any evidence this was not AA77, or are your standards of proof for a particular theory extremely rigorous (or is this a false dilemma?)
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
I'm afraid your mistaken. The "Official Story" has been proven. .
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
I'm afraid your mistaken. The "Official Story" has been proven.
I'm waiting for you to prove that it was Flight AA77. I don't need any contradictory evidence, as I'm not making any claims that need to be proven. I don't know what happened to any alleged flights or alleged passengers. But if that's the alleged Flight AA77, then you're not doing a great job convincing me that it is.
Why don't many believers understand the nature of proof and null hypothesis? Believers need to prove the official story, as that's the hypothesis being proposed. Without proof, the hypothesis can't be supported, so the null hypothesis takes precedence.
I'm obligated to support my claim only to reasonable levels. For example you could contest that unless I can identify every single debris section, then it's not proof.
What people? Where is the proof that any people boarded Flight AA77? Who saw them board the plane that was identified as Flight AA77? How do we know that the same plane that was allegedly Flight AA77 upon alleged departure was the same plane that allegedly struck the Pentagon?