It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond94
wouldn't that defeat the whole purpose having a missile defense shield in poland? because in the process you're creating a new more powerful enemy the russians
Originally posted by SailorinAZ
reply to post by magicmushroom
I am not sure that I would say it is accurate to say America lost in Viet Nam. It depends on definition. America was not conquered by the N. Vietnamese.
Also, we did conquer Afghanistan in a matter of weeks. Something no one else could do before and we did squash the Iraqi army and Government in a matter of weeks as well.
As for the ongoing fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, many fighting us are not even natives.
The problem is when American gov runs the war instead of allowing the generals to due their job.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond94
wouldn't that defeat the whole purpose having a missile defense shield in poland? because in the process you're creating a new more powerful enemy the russians
What are the Russians going to do, build more advance ballistic missiles? Hundreds of missiles compare to 10 interceptors? Go ahead and let them spend hundred of billions dollars worth of equipment, just like the Soviet Union did. We had a powerful Soviet Union and it was still a Cold War. No nukes were launch.
[edit on 20-8-2008 by deltaboy]
Originally posted by Silenceisall
I don't think Russia is going to start a nuclear war. The most they will do is try to increase their influence in South America and hit Europe with oil restrictions. This is not WW3 yet folks...breathe