It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
It's really funny that this left wing propaganda piece fails to mention how often straight men in the military are propositioned by the queers that liberals want to allow there.
There is no room in this Country for hyphenated Americanism and Professional Victim Hood. Also for the lazy Human Parasites that are having a feeding frenzy living off of the hard earned accomplishments of Others !
Originally posted by re22666
Originally posted by Wifiman
Actually it was the troll solo1 who started this, not re22666. I'm blaming solo1 for any transgressions that happen in this thread, not the satanic ramhead icon governed by re22666 who trys to make us feel that he has a sense of morality.
i have my bible ready here. any chapter or verse that can explain how my avatar is satanc cool
then i will show you the parts that explicit explain you CANNOT cast judgement, that is a sin, isnt it??????
ooh or maybe you can show me where it says you can judge someone, as long as it is based on a picture based on a geometric shape that was deemed evil thousands of years after jesus.
[edit on 8/3/2008 by re22666]
Originally posted by re22666
picture based on a geometric shape that was deemed evil thousands of years after jesus.
[edit on 8/3/2008 by re22666]
Originally posted by re22666
Originally posted by Wifiman
Originally posted by re22666
Originally posted by EYEOFEAGLE
reply to post by re22666
It seems as if you are a very tough and brave soul. I would love to see the look on your face on your day of judgement when you are standing in front of GOD himself and he asks you why you had a symbol of satan on your user profile. You are truly a smart person!!!!!
GODSPEED,
Eye of Eagle
lol, so we are talking about the HUGE amount of women being raped by OUR OWN MILITARY. and to discount me, you say god will judge me based on a picture? ok buddy. tell you what. feel free to U2U me, start a new thread, whatever. you can show me exactly where my avatar is in the bible. if you are questioning my religion because questioning my patriotism failed miserably, please back that up sir. i know why you see a satanic symbol, you are myopic, judgemental, and ignorant. that is ok. you can still recant what you said, or prove it.
Where is this "HUGE" amounts of women you are talking about? This smacks of sensationalizm! "Fox new reports...California completely on fire!!!"
Hmm..I live in california and been waiting with my marshmellow on a stick...can't find a fire to roast it on.
[edit on 2-8-2008 by Wifiman]
i am sorry, there is an acceptable amount of raped women?
please tell me the the numbers that are ok and the ones that are bad and what qualifies as huge. i would say 40% speaks for itself but hey, im just going by the numbers and not blind ignorance to justify pseudopatriotism.
Originally posted by re22666
thanks for clearing that up. i have been waiting for a good argument for rape being ok.
it is because straight guys are afraid of being hit on by queers.
it seems so simple now
thanks good christian patriotic american for not letting us look like ignorant mysogonist hicks that are soooo manly the gay men scare us.
Originally posted by Wifiman
Originally posted by re22666
picture based on a geometric shape that was deemed evil thousands of years after jesus.
[edit on 8/3/2008 by re22666]
Are you from the future? I'm fairly sure that the pentagram was deemed "Evil" more than 8 years ago.
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
Originally posted by re22666
thanks for clearing that up. i have been waiting for a good argument for rape being ok.
it is because straight guys are afraid of being hit on by queers.
it seems so simple now
thanks good christian patriotic american for not letting us look like ignorant mysogonist hicks that are soooo manly the gay men scare us.
This statement exemplifies that fact that you fail to posses the intellectual fortitude to comprehend the meaning of the points I was trying to make. It was not an argument meant to support rape. Take off your DNC goggles and stop filtering everything through your BS liberal views and perhaps you will better be able to understand the fine nuances of an opposing position.
Originally posted by re22666
Originally posted by constantwonder
i hope you do not think im defending the perpatraitors of these crimes im not im only saying you cant count all of them in the same lot.... they arent all bad people id say not even more than a few percent are....criminals eed to be punished but branding our entire military as evil is wrong and helps to perpetuate the bad image the world has of the american people
fine, then understand i am not condemning the whole lot either. i am condemning each and every person here that feels there is any reason to defend these actions. you can say you feel it is a small percentage all you like. who is raping 40%? one guy? oh and there are statistics, stories, videos, confessions, and on and on and on. it is bad, real bad. it needs to be condemned, not defended.
ANY good, partiotic american, soldier or citizen, would NOT rape
would NOT help foster an environment where it is ok
would NOT help cover it up
would NOT defend anyone for doing it
Originally posted by re22666
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
Originally posted by re22666
thanks for clearing that up. i have been waiting for a good argument for rape being ok.
it is because straight guys are afraid of being hit on by queers.
it seems so simple now
thanks good christian patriotic american for not letting us look like ignorant mysogonist hicks that are soooo manly the gay men scare us.
This statement exemplifies that fact that you fail to posses the intellectual fortitude to comprehend the meaning of the points I was trying to make. It was not an argument meant to support rape. Take off your DNC goggles and stop filtering everything through your BS liberal views and perhaps you will better be able to understand the fine nuances of an opposing position.
ooooh someone got a thesarus for christmas, or word of the day calendar. look, intelligently structured sentences impress stupid people unless they also include something intelligent in them. i am not a liberal or a democrat. apparently only they are against rape? or only they are not scared off by gay people? you use big words to say nothing yet have no problem spewing ignorant rants and homophobia in supporting the people here who support "some rape." whatever you say buddy.
just what was it an argument for then? especially in the context in which it stands?
[edit on 8/3/2008 by re22666]
Originally posted by re22666
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
Originally posted by re22666
thanks for clearing that up. i have been waiting for a good argument for rape being ok.
it is because straight guys are afraid of being hit on by queers.
it seems so simple now
thanks good christian patriotic american for not letting us look like ignorant mysogonist hicks that are soooo manly the gay men scare us.
This statement exemplifies that fact that you fail to posses the intellectual fortitude to comprehend the meaning of the points I was trying to make. It was not an argument meant to support rape. Take off your DNC goggles and stop filtering everything through your BS liberal views and perhaps you will better be able to understand the fine nuances of an opposing position.
ooooh someone got a thesarus for christmas, or word of the day calendar. look, intelligently structured sentences impress stupid people unless they also include something intelligent in them. i am not a liberal or a democrat. apparently only they are against rape? or only they are not scared off by gay people? you use big words to say nothing yet have no problem spewing ignorant rants and homophobia in supporting the people here who support "some rape." whatever you say buddy.
just what was it an argument for then? especially in the context in which it stands?
[edit on 8/3/2008 by re22666]
Originally posted by re22666
Originally posted by Wifiman
Originally posted by re22666
picture based on a geometric shape that was deemed evil thousands of years after jesus.
[edit on 8/3/2008 by re22666]
Are you from the future? I'm fairly sure that the pentagram was deemed "Evil" more than 8 years ago.
lol, 8 years ago? and jesus was really born in 0 right? wold you feel better if i rounded down to say the 18th century? it is over a thousand but you are right not quite two either is it? i am so sorry. look how right you are now???? wow!!! oh wait, no you still havent told me where in christianity my there is something to back up what you say about my avatar being satanic. but thats ok. i didnt expect you to prove what you said, know what you are talking about, or read anything.
Originally posted by Wifiman
Probably due to misinterpretation of symbols used by ceremonial magicians, it later became associated with Satanism and subsequently rejected by most of Christianity sometime in the twentieth century"
Originally posted by constantwonder
reply to post by re22666
just hold the phone killer i didnt call u satanic i said you invalidate your argument by spouting off about the bible and that judging people is a sin a previous poster merely mentioned your symbol which is recognized by popular culture to be satanic and the you started talkin about how you have your bible right here and will be glad to show us where is says judgeing is a sin..... i merely thought this meant maybe you prescribe to it and if you dont then why are you talking about it