It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Positive Reinforcement. The examples above describe what is referred to as positive reinforcement. Think of it as adding something in order to increase a response. For example, adding a treat will increase the response of sitting; adding praise will increase the chances of your child cleaning his or her room. The most common types of positive reinforcement or praise and rewards, and most of us have experienced this as both the giver and receiver.
Negative Reinforcement. Think of negative reinforcement as taking something negative away in order to increase a response. Imagine a teenager who is nagged by his mother to take out the garbage week after week. After complaining to his friends about the nagging, he finally one day performs the task and to his amazement, the nagging stops. The elimination of this negative stimulus is reinforcing and will likely increase the chances that he will take out the garbage next week.
Punishment. Punishment refers to adding something aversive in order to decrease a behavior. The most common example of this is disciplining (e.g. spanking) a child for misbehaving. The reason we do this is because the child begins to associate being punished with the negative behavior. The punishment is not liked and therefore to avoid it, he or she will stop behaving in that manner.
Extinction. When you remove something in order to decrease a behavior, this is called extinction. You are taking something away so that a response is decreased.
Research has found positive reinforcement is the most powerful of any of these. Adding a positive to increase a response not only works better, but allows both parties to focus on the positive aspects of the situation. Punishment, when applied immediately following the negative behavior can be effective, but results in extinction when it is not applied consistently. Punishment can also invoke other negative responses such as anger and resentment.
The NSA can reinforce a predetermined desired behavior by associating a subconscious implant (negative or positive reinforcement) with an event. An example is that when the NSA want's to isolate the subject from the company of a specific person place or thing, the subject will be implanted with a feeling of increased anxiety, hostility, tension, simple discomfort, or a feeling of a lack of peace. When the subject leaves the person, place, or thing, another posthypnotic implant is triggered that rewards the subject's behavior with a feeling of relief from the anxiety, hostility, tension, discomfort, and peace is restored in the subject's mind.
Mind control is getting people to do what they want to do (you simply influence what they want so it's in your best interest).
There are two ways to get people to do what you want.
The first, behavior modification, allows you to change a person's undesirable behaviors by using positive reinforcement.
The second method of influencing is reality modification. We'll concentrate most of our attention on this. This mind control technique is successful because of the way in which your requests are presented.
KNOW WHAT PEOPLE NEED
There are three main goals people subconsciously seek. They are:
1. Symbolic Rewards
2. Material Gains
3. Security.....
Originally posted by SwordMaster
Once I all realize this what do I do?
Do I stop coming to ats?
Or should I believe that it is all just entertainment and treat it like a t.v. show.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Well sure. Which is why positive reinforcement can be appreciated but neednt be given an exaggerated meaning. Doing that would lead to being controlled by the provider of the positive reinforcement.
However, this dependence on approval and applause didnt start with the NSA or online...it started in your childhood, at home.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Yes. It works until you become aware of it (Hence the importance of a thread like this). Im pretty sure the praise-tactics dont work as much on you anymore. Admit it.
Btw: Some praise is also heartfelt. I for example have this "applaud" function as a moderator. When I see something that touches me or excites me, I hit the "applause" function. No ill intent there.
Originally posted by The_Alarmist2012
Is it possible that as a long term member and a staff member that your being compelled to apply positive reinforcement or 'applause' or any of the other positive or negative functions you may have upon members is actually what you have been conditioned to do?
Originally posted by The_Alarmist2012
Is it possible that as a long term member and a staff member that your being compelled to apply positive reinforcement or 'applause' or any of the other positive or negative functions you may have upon members is actually what you have been conditioned to do?
Originally posted by intrepid
Nope, we are a team but we have many different personalities and moderating styles. Some applaud more than others. That said, the applause, like all other staff functions are totally transparent. It's all logged. The entire staff can see them. The bottom line on both positive and negative reinforcement is for the betterment of the board for all members.
Originally posted by The_Alarmist2012
Question if I may ask, how is what is for the betterment of the board for all members actually determined?
A governing body?
Just the owners, advertisers or others??
However, it may be possible that it is an experiment of sorts, at the expense of unknowing users, if so that seems wrong and leaves open the potential for much more sinister uses.