It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sos37
WHOA ... BH knocked back into her place on more than one thread on the same day!
Barack Obama was not prohibited from visiting U.S. troops at military facilities in Germany, but it would have been awkward.
That was the suggestion from both the Obama campaign and the military Friday, after the Illinois senator drew criticism from Republicans for canceling his scheduled visits while in Europe.
...
“Senator Obama made the decision that we were not going to have wounded men and women become involved in a campaign event or what would be perceived as a campaign event,” Gibbs said.
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman told FOX News the Pentagon did not tell Obama he couldn’t visit, but explained that he would be under specific restrictions.
you have to do it with the restrictions that apply to any other candidate
Obama would not have been able to bring any of his campaign staff — only one Senate staffer and security. He also would not have been able to address the media or make any campaign-related statements.
John McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said, “Barack Obama is wrong. It is never inappropriate to visit our men and women in the military.”
McCain’s Senate colleague Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., also took a shot at Obama.
“I noticed that Obama had plenty of time to shoot hoops … but he didn’t have the time to stop by (the Ramstein base),” he told FOX News.
Now, feel free to think he "ignored the troops" because he couldn't take the press with him (as if he didn't have enough press already this week), but the truth is, it would have been awkward and the military agreed. He didn't want to cheapen the seriousness of wounded military with a "campaign stop".
Originally posted by southern_Guardian
Then Obama visits troops and now I hear from righties scream at the fact he didnt go visit the wounded troops, yet I bet you that if he had done that, the righties would then scream his making the war look bad
Originally posted by southern_Guardian
Im sorry but the only traitors to this country and to the troops abroad are the ones who seem to support this war of oil, and thats what it is, a war for oil.
This whole "GOP for troops" BS has gone to far. 4000 lives lost to the far right's war for oil and you have the nerve to question those who intend to end it. Obama did his best to visit as many troops as possible, YOUR party and your candidate, McCain, prefers to continue killing off more troops for a war built on lies .
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
Much like when Obama showed up for moral and physical support for the floods in Illinois. he bagged a few sand bags and still got blasted for showing up to help out.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
He was there as a shoulder to cry on
he did bag more than two sandbags.
Which is all much more than i can say for John McCain.
Its a point well made, and even backed up by yourself.
He was there for support. People like you blasted him for it.
If he had showed up in the injured troop wing, you would have said it was for a photo-op and nothing more.
Blind hate never did anyone any good, and posts like this are living proof
Thats just my 2 cents. And before Bush came along, it used to be a dollar.
Here's a source maybe you can relate to:
FOX News
Originally posted by mental modulator
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
" That liberal #@$%^$# used are troops to benefit his campaign, how dare he! "
Originally posted by mental modulator
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Next, John Mccain would charge on to the stage on his HOOVER ROUND scooter and protest Obamas actions by firing off his spent diaper at the liberal media section....