It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
This is a tempest in a teapot and it really is the business of Louisiana and no one else's.
Nothing has been said about whether ID will be taught in science classes or not, but even if it is, so what?
Originally posted by Mr Mxyztplk
and as for as your dismissive "so what" goes about teaching creationism goes creationism has no place science class room, it is the antithesis of science, is says don't worry about how things work or are the way they are, god made the universe and that is all we need to know.
Sentell explains that the bill "would allow science teachers to use supplemental materials, in addition to state-issued textbooks, on issues like evolution, global warming and human cloning. The aim of such materials, the bill says, is to promote 'critical thinking skills, logical analysis and open and objective discussion of scientific theories being studied,' including evolution." Bill sponsor Sen. Ben Nevers (D-Bogalusa) explained: "I just believe that it is important that supplemental scientific information be able to be brought into the school system."
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
That's what you say, but obviously those who pay taxes and send their kids to school in Louisiana feel differently and I think that it's infinitely more fair for them to decide what is taught in school than for those who have no stake in the issue at all.
I guarantee you that if the two theories are taught equally, the better theory will prevail.
I would reiterate that unless you live in Louisiana and send your kids to school there, this really is none of your business.
to my opinion and to the courts opinions.
You're welcome to your opinion, but your outrage is misplaced.
[edit on 2008/6/19 by GradyPhilpott]
Originally posted by drwizardphd
I wonder just what other "supplemental materials" they have in mind? The bible perhaps? I don't know of any "supplemental scientific information" that supports the creation theory.
Originally posted by Mr Mxyztplk
reply to post by schrodingers dog
was that to me or GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to post by Mr Mxyztplk
They cannot. The principle of separation is too fundamental to the first amendment even with these supreme court justices. Think about it, it would open the door for muslim, jewish, and any other faith based belief to be taught. It won't happen, it's just grandstanding.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
You can get your blood pressure up over the matter, but I have more serious matters to consider.