It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Enthralled Fan
Because I tend to think that what MrdDstrbr did was to encite something that wasn't really asked for. If Springer wanted to challenge the guy, he would hav asked the guy himself.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
And then when I actually talk to Prophet, I find out that he is very much willing to interview with ATS, he is very much willing to come out and summon UFOs for Springer, under whatever conditions he wants!
So it seems to me, it's ATS that's not giving him a fair chance. "We won't let you prove yourself and summon UFOs for us because we already know you're a con man." Denying Ignorance, or casting judgement? Hmm.........
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
You should know, there is a fair amount of interest there to see if you can summon a UFO for ATS under controlled conditions.
Springer, one of the three owners of ATS, says,
"If he pays his own way out to the middle of a desert that I choose, at the time I choose, and he can call down a UFO that I can see through a telescope I will change my opinion."
This could be a great opportunity for you, since ATS is HOT right now - with over 2 million visits per month. If you really can summon UFOs at will, this could help you get the kind of exposure you need.
Will you accept the challenge?
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
ATS not giving him a fair chance? Give me a break. And real prophets don't receive visions that are fuzzy. God didn't give his prophets fuzzy visions and then let them figure it out. No, not only did He specifically outline what would happen and when it would happen, it did happen exactly as he said it would. The prophet was simply a messenger.
But here we have someone who claims to be a prophet and has these fuzzy visions. After all, he's not 100% sure that the vision he had was describing ATS. And he keeps saying "we". Whose "we"? Does PY have some alter egos running around getting visions as well?
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
Really? Then why does PY state that *if* we can come to an agreement and then later wishes to negotiate? Didn't Springer make it clear that he would pick the spot, that PY had to pay his own way there and call down UFO's. Why would an agreement or negotiations be necessary?
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
All I can say is, look at the amount of interest this has generated. Look at the number of people who are saying, hey this is a GOOD idea. Expose him as a fraud once and for all, or collect some really cool UFO evidence. Ignorance Denied, either way.
Prophet is being very cooperative and willing to communicate here. He seems extremely confident that he can pass the test.
I think it would be foolish to sit back and ignore this and shut him out....
Originally posted by Enthralled Fan
At the very least, it would have been proper for you to let Springer know ahead of time what you intended to do. Instead, you went ahead with this because as you pointed out, Springer made the statement in public.
You also mentione that "ATS is HOT right now"
and it seems perfectly clear to me in what Springer said that they don't have any intention of promoting the guy.
Originally posted by Nola213
There's footage of a metallic orb, going behind a cloud then back out, then back behind the cloud again, now THAT is something of note. But I've only seen footage of that one time.
Originally posted by wang_ke_~
Wow, Freenergy2, I'm so impressed! You seem to have the inside scoop on who has fuzzy visions and who does not!
That's amazing! So because you are a Born Again Christian, you have all of this wonderful knowledge??
and this is what Jesus told you personally?? Just wondering.
But could you prove it to us??
Originally posted by wang_ke_~
Isn't there anyone here who lives in the Las Vegas area who could watch PY summon some UFOs?
Then that person could report back here on what they saw including a video of the sighting.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Originally posted by Enthralled Fan
At the very least, it would have been proper for you to let Springer know ahead of time what you intended to do. Instead, you went ahead with this because as you pointed out, Springer made the statement in public.
That's right, Springer made the statement in public. All I did was say to Prophet, hey look at what Springer of ATS said about you!
No, Springer said they had no intention of interviewing him. But he then went on to say, in my thread, that he would change his opinion of Prophet if Prophet summoned a UFO for him out in the desert!
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
What I have is the ability to read posts. I suggest you go do the same.
Originally posted by sensfan
For those of you waiting to hear from Springer, I doubt you will. He's already states his thoughts in the first thread started by the OP....And he's right on.
The reality is this fellow has been blown out of the water on so many levels it's not funny, His July 2006 landing in Las Vegas went by without whisper.
ALL of his "UFOs" have the incredible ability to look exactly like large balloons being carried by wind currents.
Originally posted by Springer
HOLD THE PHONE...
This is the fourth or fifth report I've read about James' ranch. I don't remember if I met James in San Jose last year but I know he was there and that Johnny and Dave have interviewed him.
Firstly, I have to agree these photos are utterly unimpressive and I would agree with the majority who see a moth, dust, etc...
THAT BEING SAID...
The testimony of a pilot holds sway with me to some extent. The inability to capture the things in a cheap digital camera doesn't conclusively rule out what the man says he experienced and saw.
Originally posted by jpvskyfreak
SMOKERSROOM & WILBERT
SmokersRoom : If you re read my post I said they were flying faster than a commercial then slow right down then speed up again .... the reference to the UK Southampton ORBS was an attempt by me to to visually indicate to readers the kind of image in the sky we saw. But ours did change its intensity of brightness.
lanterns don't Descend rapidly ..stop fly level at high speed then stop then disappear then come back on , or power up for that matter.
Winds at each level in the sky are generally uniform in strength ... so say at 10,000ft you might have 25kts of wind and at 15000ft you may have 40kts of wind .... "if" it was a balloon or a lantern it would be cruising at a constant slow uniform speed of the wind.
If it did bob as rapidly or as fast as it did it would tear a normal aircraft in half let alone a lantern.
Mt. Adams elevation is 12276ft .... so any aircraft that has a track that comes within 10nm either side of their flight path needs to fly at a lowest safe altitude of 14300ft and airliners would add another 1000ft to that ...being the absolute minimum altitude you could be at in an emergency or any for any reason at night or when in cloud or operating under IFR flight rules would be say 15300ft for argument sake.
The craft we observed were below the tip of Mt Adams about 8-10 miles away displaying flight characteristics that defy that of normal aircraft at about 10,000ft.... so if they were aircraft made by us they were operating illegally and displaying amazing flight characteristics .... unknown to us at present.
No it wasn't a Lantern and it wasn't an aircraft. It was something that I had not seen before ... and after all the time and effort it took to come from half way round the world to the Ranch I ill be coming back for sure. It was Amazing and unmistakable.
"If the light doesn't fit you must acquit?" Sorry I know what I saw!