It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So when people begin to question things on ATS, invite in a discussion. Celebrate diversity, and be willing to question what you have read or been told. Learn in depth what the scientific method is, and how evolution is applied to research in modern medicine, human and animal studies. Most of our modern developments as a species have come out of science and evolutionary theory. Chemistry, modern medicine, social sciences...all of it! This is why when you try and throw creationism at someone who is experienced in the sciences they tend to roll their eyes at you...you will not ever be able to definitively prove them wrong either, way too much evidence and advancements have come about from this theory. Does it explain everything? No...there is obviously some room left for other theories as too man's origins. I lean more into the star seeding one while even then evolution still is in play and can co-exist with genetic manipulation, but you pick what ever one works best for you. I put my faith in science, and perhaps some day science will back up your faith?
Originally posted by skyshow
Um, that could just of easily read..."the only possible reason is a common source of...Biological accidents and chemical reactions". I would argue science doesn't need to find "the maker", it is employed to solve tasks a bit more down to earth. Perhaps in the future however, new ways of measuring the either, as it were, will be developed and more substantial hard evidence can be collected to help us not only identify, but better define the so called "creator". Science moves very slow however, and it's findings are not always agreeable and often come as a complete surprise to those who hold beliefs that science sometimes find to be in error.
Regardless, what difference does it make? If one truly has faith and believes that they have the truth, why the need to debate scientific findings?
Science is not the mortal enemy of faith as so many think. It may be that items of your faith be modified to match up with scientific findings (ie: when we had to change the item from the sun rotating around the earth to the earth rotating around the sun...). Wouldn't one of the faith want to have this flexibility rather than being rigid and resistant to change?
There may be a god, and there may not be, but whatever the ultimate reality of it all is, what makes little people here on this one tiny planet orbiting this one average star out on the outskirts of one galaxy containing millions of star systems, and one galaxy out billions, think they hold the absolute truth?
Most of our modern developments as a species have come out of science and evolutionary theory.
Originally posted by wreckage
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
~ Epicurus
[edit on 31/5/2008 by wreckage]
There is a place for Christians, it's called church.
Originally posted by skyshow
reply to post by Conspiriology
What's the verse? You know the one about getting thine beam out of thine own first before passing judgement....all this does is add more weight onto the O.P.
[edit on 1-6-2008 by skyshow]
Originally posted by skyshow
Never before ever in my life have I ever known a bunch of judgemental reactionary backward bunch of folks ever!
You mean like what is happening with all the anti-creationist/Anti-religious posts on this Thread www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by the OP
They acted in cohesion, working the threads as a group, backing one another up in debates, posting encouraging messages on one another's profiles, making pincer attacks on atheist or agnostic posters, and working -- or so it seemed to me -- to a well-thought-out agenda.
They efficiently exploited all the benefits of cooperation and teamwork that genuine FTists can never enjoy, because FTists aren't team players. And they were formidable, because of this; they could collectively bring more energy to a debate than any individual ATS member could muster on his own.
Originally posted by Astyanax
I think this has gone on long enough
This thread has degenerated into pointless games of abuse tennis and crowmobbing. There's nothing to be gained here any more by anyone. The actual point of discussion has long since been lost. It's all primate threat displays now, and it's gone on long enough.
Originally posted by RedDragon
reply to post by atlasastro
The definition of religion is it's based on faith and the definition of faith is a belief without evidence (objective, the only real kind). The definition of ignorance is lack of knowledge (evidence). Religion is the literal end of ignorance. ATS's moto is to deny ignorance. If you're not going to do that, you should leave.
see www.youtube.com... for why evidence must be objective LOL
[edit on 6/1/08 by RedDragon]
Originally posted by skyshow
gee, that's nice. My aren't we full of judgement?
How in the hell do you know if I'm an athiest or not? Huh? That's none of your damned business. Some of you Christians bring so much shame onto the teachings of such a wonderful being. You claim to believe, and yet you make such a mockery of the teachings.
And yes I am constantly insulted by, and ashamed of you so called followers of Christ. I've read and studied the scriptures, and some of you folks couldn't be farther from the truth nor recognize it if it stood up and bit you in the face! Never before ever in my life have I ever known a bunch of judgemental reactionary backward bunch of folks ever!
What's the verse? You know the one about getting thine beam out of thine own first before passing judgement....all this does is add more weight onto the O.P.