It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
But what you're looking at is laizzes-faire Christianity. You don't have to live a good life. You don't have to be a decent person. You don't have to stand by your word. You don't need to be charitable, or humble, or conscientious, or anything else that Jesus taught. Nothing. Throw out your bible - you don't need it. Call yourself a Christian, and boom, free ticket to heaven.
This is also known as "Protestantism."
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
And here in the United States, we have combined this laizzes-fair Christianity with laizzes-faire economics... And boom. Megachurch. Do as I say, not as I do, and I say give me money for the lawrd. Praise the Republicans and pass that ammo, for they give us tax breaks and librulz need taking care of!
Originally posted by Clearskies
That's an extremely broad brush, you're using! Protestantism.
True, there are many much like you've described, but,
just as there are those starving in the catholic faith, whilst the pope drinks from gold-studded chalices and lives in numerous palaces.
Just like other faiths have their charlatans in the jungles and deserts and compounds!
The 'Love' of money is the root of all evil. The Bible is always true.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Okay. Find me a branch of protestantism that does not adhere to these five principles:
Sola Christus (Christ Alone; there are no saints, and works do nothing to assist your entry to heaven)
Sola Scriptura (Scripture alone; that only our version of the Bible counts)
Sola Fide (Faith alone; you are rewarded merely for believing, not for doing)
Sola Gratia (Grace alone; Nothing you do can change your state of grace with God. Your merit and life do not matter)
Sola Deo Gloria (Glory to God alone; All glory is due to God alone, since salvation is accomplished solely through his will and action)
Since these are the defining points of every branch of Protestantism, and four out of five tell you that it's about your faith and God's judgement alone, and nothing else matters, please explain to me how I'm broad-brushing when I say Protestantism doesn't believe you need to live your life with Jesus as a model for His grace. I am ever so eager to hear the sounds of you gnawing your own foot off here.
Here is what the Catholic church and the Protostant church have shown Jesus to be:
Here is what Yeshua actually looks like:
Matthew 25:35-40
35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
However, Mohandas Gandhi said it best. "I like your Christ. But I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ."
Okay. Find me a branch of protestantism that does not adhere to these five principles:
Sola Christus (Christ Alone; there are no saints, and works do nothing to assist your entry to heaven)
Sola Scriptura (Scripture alone; that only our version of the Bible counts)
Sola Fide (Faith alone; you are rewarded merely for believing, not for doing)
Sola Gratia (Grace alone; Nothing you do can change your state of grace with God. Your merit and life do not matter)
Sola Deo Gloria (Glory to God alone; All glory is due to God alone, since salvation is accomplished solely through his will and action)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by jimmyjackblack
When did the RCC start selling indulgences again? Pope Pious V canceled existing monetary indulgences, and forbade any more being granted, in 1567. It's four hundred and forty years later, and so far, no other Pope has sold indulgences.
Oh wait, I forgot I'm on the CiR forum. If it's not Pentecostal, it's crrrrrrap!
'Course, Catholicism is the largest group of Christians on the earth, followed closely by Eastern Orthodoxy... So... Maybe they're on to something.
I'm telling you what's behind the prosperity doctrine. American protestantism - with its focus on do-nothing salvation, political indulgence, and fast-track capitalism is behind this doctrine. I'm terribly sorry if this pisses off people, but that's exactly what is behind this "philosophy"
[edit on 14-4-2008 by TheWalkingFox]
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by jimmyjackblack
When did the RCC start selling indulgences again? Pope Pious V canceled existing monetary indulgences, and forbade any more being granted, in 1567. It's four hundred and forty years later, and so far, no other Pope has sold indulgences.
WHO CAN GRANT INDULGENCES
The distribution of the merits contained in the treasury of the Church is an exercise of authority (potestas iurisdictionis), not of the power conferred by Holy orders (potestas ordinis). Hence the pope, as supreme head of the Church on earth, can grant all kinds of indulgences to any and all of the faithful; and he alone can grant plenary indulgences. The power of the bishop, previously unrestricted, was limited by Innocent III (1215) to the granting of one year's indulgence at the dedication of a church and of forty days on other occasions. Leo XIII (Rescript of 4 July. 1899) authorized the archbishops of South America to grant eighty days (Acta S. Sedis, XXXI, 758). , II, q. viii, a. 16).Pius X (28 August, 1903) allowed cardinals in their titular churches and dioceses to grant 200 days; archbishops, 100; bishops, 50. These indulgences are not applicable to the souls departed. They can be gained by persons not belonging to the diocese, but temporarily within its limits; and by the subjects of the granting bishop, whether these are within the diocese or outside--except when the indulgence is local. Priests, vicars general, abbots, and generals of religious orders cannot grant indulgences unless specially authorized to do so. On the other hand, the pope can empower a cleric who is not a priest to give an indulgence (St. Thomas, "Quodlib."