It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Disclosed
I believe that would be the DNA evidence recovered. Well, at least at the Pentagon location.
The remains of the five hijackers have been identified through a process of exclusion, as they did not match DNA samples contributed by family members of all 183 victims who died at the site.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Wrong again. According to the Arlingtion Cemetary site, the hijackers of the plane that hit the Pentagon WERE NOT identified by DNA but a process of exclusion.
The only two brothers who died at the Pentagon on 9/11 were hijackers Nawaf and Salem al-Hamzi. Remains of two brothers were identified by DNA: "The DNA results strengthened the hypothesis that two of the terrorists were brothers, as indicated by other evidence. Two of the terrorist STR profiles aboard the AA Flight 77 gave a sibling index greater than 500. To further test the hypothesis of maternal relatedness, AFDIL sequenced the HVI and HVII regions of mtDNA for these individuals. The sequences generated did match in HVI and HVII, which is consistent with a maternal relationship between the two men.
Originally posted by DisclosedThe FBI seems to have more current information...
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
So that still does not account for all the hijackers.
Please be adult enough to show evindece that all the hijackers are dead as originally claimed.
Some up to date information on hiajckers that may still be alive.
Originally posted by Disclosed You ARE doing research, correct?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
If you and others are going to claim all the hijakers are dead then you need to evidnece to support thtat claim. So far no one has been able to post that evidence.
Originally posted by Disclosed
Is your only source a site that was last updated June 2007, that even states its data is unreliable?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed
Is your only source a site that was last updated June 2007, that even states its data is unreliable?
Its enough of a source to show reasonable doubt. Plus i am sure i can fine a lot more sources.
Originally posted by Disclosed
If you did have other sources, you would have posted them. Instead, you pin all your hopes on a website that even states it data is not reliable.
Originally posted by Disclosed
You place all your hopes and conspiracy theories on a site that says it's data is unreliabl:
Originally posted by Disclosed
We knew you could not prove it....and you have not.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
I have proven it since you cannot debate what i have posted, and cannot prove your fantasy that all the hijackers are dead.
Originally posted by Disclosed
Oh my...
Originally posted by Disclosed
remember earlier in this thread, I mentioned that 40% of the victims at the WTC location still have not been identified? I even linked an April 2008 article about it.
Oh yeah, I forgot, you prefer posting the site with the "unreliable data".
1) Here is an easy example: the identity of the hijackers. The FBI had distributed a list naming 18 of the 19 alleged hijackers by 10 AM on 9/11.2 Within two weeks the identities of at least six of the hijackers were unclear; as men in Arab countries with the same names and histories, and in some cases the same photographs, were protesting that they were alive and innocent.3 In response to these protests, FBI Director Robert Mueller soon acknowledged that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers was in doubt.4 But there is no discussion of this problem in the detailed treatment of the alleged hijackers in the 9/11 Commission Report.5