It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Winefried
reply to post by AccessDenied
Thank you for your excellent initial post and for all the hard work and time that went into it. It will take me a while to read through all of your links but I will do it. Even just reading the basic outline and a few of your suppoting references has been thought provoking. It is so refreshing to read a thread that is both interesting and of high quality, both in its content and presentation.
Originally posted by Hal9000
Very interesting posts and quite a "grand" theory that connects several strange anomalies in this world. I can't say that I think all of it is true, but it is thought provoking. I have also considered that many things that people see in the skies are possibly time machines. If you think about it, there have been sighting at just about every event in history including the first landing on the Moon, 9/11, and many others. I have considered that maybe they are from the future and witnessing the event that they know is going to happen, but don't try to interfere.
However, the idea that we are all controlled with fear to live our mundane lives the way we do is hard to swallow. Let me ask this. If all of a sudden we were freed from all the control and fear that is controlling us, what would we do?
How would our lives be different? What would we be doing that we don't do now? I ask this in all honesty, because I am curious to hear your responses.
Originally posted by AccessDenied
Fear is a powerful force.Second only to thought in my opinion. It is what paralyzes us daily.Fear of the smallest things, like forgetting something, or losing something, to fear of death or what comes after it. How much does FEAR really rule your life?
Fear rules us all.THEY use fear to rule us all.We must all act in spite of fear. They only control us, because we are afraid.
Those in the highest power,are unknown to us. You can say aliens, or Masons, but I believe they are a pure bloodline of HUMANS.
Originally posted by cornixman
Those in the highest power,are unknown to us. You can say aliens, or Masons, but I believe they are a pure bloodline of HUMANS.
AccessDenied,
could you elaborate a little on who you think this pure bloodline of humans are?
I do believe there is some form of "Illuminati" running the show but I was curious as to your thoughts on who you think they are?
cornixman
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Good Job AD!!! Starred & Flagged I just got done reading through all of the posts... now I'll start getting into the links you've provided - Thanks!
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
As far as the fear aspect ruling our lives...your overly generalizing! In some aspects fear works well such as preventing secrets(any secrets)from being released to people that shouldn't know. For example, if terrorists get access to biological weapons, nukes, chemical warfare then how safe would our world be? Just look at the anthrax cases shortly after 9-11. A lot of people almost got killed and a few did!
The Alexandrian Text
This text arose in Egypt and is generally conceded to be the most important one. Westcott and Hort, who named this the Neutral Text, thought that Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus had preserved a pure form of the Alexandrian type of text. It is now evident that these manuscripts had been corrected by later scribes, but they are the most ancient uncials and preserve the Alexandrian text at an early stage. Some of the important papyrus manuscripts also represent this family.
The Byzantine Text
This family has been designated by many names. It is called Byzantine because it was adopted in Constantinople and used as the common text in the Byzantine world. It was produced in Antioch, Syria, under the direction of Lucian near the beginning of the fourth century and has been called the Syrian or Antiochene text. It was used almost universally after the eight century. Both Erasmus, who created the first printed Greek text, and the translators of the King James Version of the Bible used this type of text. It was produced by combining earlier texts and has less value than the Alexandrian text. A (Codex Alexandrinus, fifth century) and C (Codex Ephraemi, fifth century) are the oldest representatives of the Byzantine family. A great majority of late uncials and minuscules belong to this group.
The Western Text
This family of texts was clsoely related to the church in the west, particularly in North Africa. Although it can probably be traced to the second century, its value has been disputed. It was used by the erly church fathers. Its age would seem to suggest great importance, but there are clear indications that it was not carefully preserved. It is best represented by the Old Latin translations, by the Syriac versions, and the church fathers. Its most famous representative is manuscript D (Codex Bezae) for the book of Acts.
The Caesarean Text
This family of texts was widely used in Caesarea from which it derived its name. It seems to have arisen out of the Alexandrian text but was also mixed with the Western text. Consequently, its value is limited. Metzger suggests that it is necessary to distinguish between two stages in its development, the pre-Caesarean and the Caesarean (Bruce M. Metzger, The Text of the New Testament, p. 215). Some of its more prominent representatives are W (Washington Codex, fifth century), P45, and two groups of minuscules and lectionaries.
A vital fact to remember is that though codices Aleph and B (produced in the 4th century) are older than other Greek manuscript copies of the Scriptures, they are not older than the Pe#ta, Italic, the Old Latin Vulgate and the Waldensian versions which were produced 200 years earlier in the 2nd century. All these versions, copies of which are still in existence, agree with Textus Receptus, the underlying text of the King James Bible. I repeat: these ancient versions are some 200 years older than Vaticanus and Sinaiticus: so the 'oldest is best' argument should not be used. All Bibles fall, basically, into one of two categories.
* Those based on the Majority Text. (Textus Receptus)
* Those based on the Minority Text. (Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus etc.)
Any study of the translation of the languages of the Bible focuses on John Wycliffe and William Tyndale. Wycliffe (1330-1384 AD) opposed the shackles of Romanism and urged England to a great spiritual revival. Wycliffe believed all men should have ready access to God's word. Wycliffe undertook and finished a translation of the Bible from Latin into English in 1382. Wycliffe's work is the first complete translation of the Bible into English. John Wycliffe's work prevailed until the sixteenth century. The true father of the English Bible, though, is William Tyndale. Tyndale wanted to provide man with a translation into English from the original Hebrew and Greek, not the Latin, which was itself, a translation. It was during this same time period that Martin Luther finished a translation in German. The Catholic Church determinedly did all within its power to stop translation work and to keep the Bible from being available to all men in their languages. Tyndale was imprisoned in 1534 and in 1536, he was strangled and burned at the stake. Tyndale's efforts were not in vain, though, his New Testament was completed in 1525 and in 1535, Miles Coverdale, a scholar and friend of Tyndale, published his translation, partly based on Tyndale's work.
When it finally came time for the protestants to translate and verify their own Manuscripts of the Bible, they took great care to make sure that they were as accurate as possible. Their knowledge of linguistics and languages and translation was phenomenal. Their knowledge easily surpasses the "expertise" of modern scholars, but even today, it is protestants who continue to translate the Bible into all languages around the world. If it were not for Protestants, the Bible would still be a banned book, which is what the Roman Catholic Church declared it to be for anyone who was not a Priest.
Originally posted by AccessDenied
Please do not take this offensively EarthCitizen, but that fact that you pointed out Terrorist and 9/11..which is a forum unto itself , I'm sorry..kinda PROVES my point that you are being ruled by fear. Terrorist has become a household word since 9/11. The thing is..there have always been terrorists in the world. We never thought much of it before. Now it has been hyped up so much so that we jump at the slightest thing that may signal a terrorist attack. We DO live in fear now. A fear that was created for us. A fear that may enable Martial law to be implemented for our "SAFETY".
Originally posted by AccessDenied
As for secrets..well that depends on what you feel should be known to the public or not.How much do you think is kept a secret because the general population can't be trusted with it. Oh my..now there is a thought. We can't be trusted with the knowledge in and of our own country? Let the "Elite" worry about it, and we'll just go around saying "BAAAA". Not for me thank you.
Originally posted by AccessDenied
As for faith in humans..well of course. How could I not? It was not aliens who created everything around me. Did you even truly read what I posted and the links supporting it? I think it's obvious I don't believe in Aliens..
Originally posted by AccessDenied
But if you wish to..I'll not argue with you. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs.