2nd figure on mars found?

since we're all having a guess... mine is John Lear hitch hiking a ride back to the moon after last year's halloween party... lol.... carry on

It's quite obvious it's a shadow of a rock.

Some of you are so gullible.
What next... a shadow of a saucer?

reply to post by vze2xjjk


vze, I have seen the sunflower child before you are correct and the question do the lifeforms have green, blue or red blood. I have detected the Sandmaries recieving nourishment inside and from pods.

Could the Sandmaries also be using photosynthesis to maintain life but have to plug in every so often to the pods. The rules change from planet to planet who says they have to breath and utilize strictly oxygen they may breath carbon dioxide and need very little oxygen. We breath and utilize the oxygen on Earth of course but we still breath in the other gases including hydrogen and carbon dioxide.

Genetic engineering of new lifeforms could prove very interesting and of what the different lifeforms in our Solar System breath. We have fish that derive oxygen from a liquid called water. In our Universe I believe anything and everything is possible. Think it and it can be created now or in the future. Rik Riley



[edit on 21-2-2008 by rikriley]

Originally posted by gecko11o6
It's quite obvious it's a shadow of a rock.

Some of you are so gullible.
What next... a shadow of a saucer?

Since some believe the anomaly is a shadow, some think it to be a lifeform and some think it to be a natural formation. We will name the anomaly Gullibles Travels. Rik Riley

I can't believe some people on here. I try to legitimately and objectively explain my take and it goes unacknowledged. Yet, we've got gorilla/triceratops being highlighted and people are starring these posts that are obviously mocking the OP.

I don't agree with the OP, but at least I tried to express my ideas in an adult way.

It just goes to show what an "entertainment" society we are. We'd rather joke and poke fun than to rationally discuss ideas and theories. Congratulations. Very unintelligent. I think this thread has reached a new low with some of the people posting here.

reply to post by tyranny22


Hey tyranny, I didn't mean to ignore you. I agree with you. This figure is solid material and not shadow, that's why I've concluded that it may be a petroglyph (rock carving). To me the anatomy seems too symetrically humanoid with shoulders, a rib cage, pectorials, arms, legs, abdominal muscles and a head (and maybe even a navel). The ambient light is from behind the figure, yet you can still make out these anatomical features because of the way the light is reflected to enhance the definition. If the light was from the front the contrast wouldn't be as pronounced. Of course, you do not have to agree with my conclusions, but this is what I see, even if it defies common beliefs.

reply to post by rikriley

LOL why why why do you savages pick on poor little Nasa,constantly bothering them with justifying their billions? LEAVE NASA ALONE !!(Chris Crocker Voice)WeepWeep Oh look I've frightened the Caterpillar man with black marble eyes out of his hole.

reply to post by tyranny22
That pic would be like me taking a pic of your belly button from the side while you layed belly up on a bed and tried to discover what animal you were.In other words you have in that frame only a small fraction of the larger animal attached to it. You would need to back up to include the ridge at the "waterline" of what forms the inner ring of the crater,about 20 feet away.Some of these animals are large life. I call it a Caterpillar so that people who can't see them will get an idea of approximately which animal they'd be familiar with that it most closely resembles.That's scientifically imprecise,but I'm sure Nasa will offer you a much better explanation....oh ,tomorrow maybe.

Its a rock and nothing more.

reply to post by vze2xjjk


vze, life life everywhere no one will believe until they see for themselves. People must learn to see patterns and it does not come over night. The eyes are the dead give away and this is how I started seeing these lifeforms years ago on the surface of Mars. You must line up the 2 eyes and these lifeforms are not always the rocks or in the rocks you must look into the sand or surface areas. vze keep on keepen on. Rik Riley

reply to post by bseven


Looked very tree-trunkish to me too

I think if it is a tree- then thats even more amazing than a face there because it proves there would be oxygen there, would it not?

sooo... what

anyone who thinks this is anything more than a rock probably needs a new monitor. i think there is water and some kind of life on mars, but this is so obviously just the sided of a rock that i am amazed the thread lasted so long.

Sometimes I turn things upside down to look at it a new way because part of Nasa masking strategy is to change perspective and emphasis,which shows up as more phony when turned on its head,and the eye is not so easily tricked.Smoke and mirrors is an apt description,and a long way to go for a cover-up.

reply to post by rikriley

Rik,if you could,no rush but I probably need to know more about the pods since I could have easily skimmed past them not knowing their function.If you have pics great.If you mean the pyramidal pods and you can show one with an opening then better.I never really worked hard to unmask one.Probably many of them that look un-naturally smooth are just masked ,now that I think of it...badum-bump...very logical. It's always the obvious stuff. Here's one I uncovered somewhat.That hill of wavy sand is pretty but false.like a hollow zone covered up.But that pointy triangular rock is symetrical because it's common on Mars as the shells of the back of the heads of large crawlers with heads over 1 foot to 2 feet high for the most frequently spotted and some ancient ones in bad shape much larger. They are well balanced to stand upright forever because the chin horns/supports under the head are heavy duty for battle and digging like an anchor.

reply to post by iammonkey


look at it like this why take a picture of a particular rock thers rocks all over the place so any pic we get from mars on 1 particular object most likely isn't a rock don't the guys from nasa who drive the rover around tell it to take a picture?

reply to post by mikesingh


actually if you look really close to the right hand you can see a football thats oj's heisman trophy

That's not a hole.It's the nostrils of a large animal with a large head,very alive like an anaconda snake,big and fat. Nasa masked the mouth because those were the vital details that would clue us into recognizing it as a large predator.

Here's a face that's probably female that's easy to see in my above stretched pic just above this post(the darker reddish one).The face is at the extreme right hand edge dead center,and brighter than the surrounding area.It is alive becaue it's turned toward the rover some 100 feet or more away possibly. This is a Bonneville pic from 2004 March,released in May 2004. It looks cropped. I just saw it this morning after being away from comp more than 6 hours sleep.I think that by stepping away from the pic and viewing it at different times stimulated me to "RE-THINK" what I was seeing to discover new bits. This face is at an angle of the right eye closer,and looks like it's in the 6" to 1 foot high range. While it's more humanoid looking than most,you have to remember that its placement is key,being so close to the ground that it actually slides close to the ground all of its life. It maneuvers remembering landmarks close to the ground. Think of a body that resembles a stretched out SLINKY TOY,a spring.That's the general shape,except that like the New England Patriots LOGO it snakes/tapers at the back end.

Originally posted by vze2xjjk
Sometimes I turn things upside down to look at it a new way because part of Nasa masking strategy is to change perspective and emphasis,which shows up as more phony when turned on its head,and the eye is not so easily tricked.Smoke and mirrors is an apt description,and a long way to go for a cover-up.

vze, your correct when I flipped the photos of the Pathfinder Sojourner I realized NASA was pulling the wool over our eyes. You are so right by turning the photos upside down you get a totally different perspective. You can see the lifeforms living in their shelters upside down and I know NASA has to be laughing there you know what off.

When dealing with raw photos not on the net I use full spectrum light to activate the photo into a 3D effect. I still believe we have picked up on a digital visual code from Mars in order to see these lifeforms and anomalies others can not see. It takes many hours of scanning and viewing to get better at seeing the lifeforms. Rik Riley