posted on Feb, 13 2008 @ 02:01 PM
We actually have a lot of evidence. Consistent reports, reputable reports, mass sightings, the COMETA report, which is ground breaking in many ways.
It makes a solid case for moving the argument from "if" to "why" as in, "why come here?" It helped to move the Alien Hypothesis to the Alien
Theory, and that has to count for something. Many arguments have been made to look at this from a different point of view using the Scientific Method
to the best of our ability. We seem to trust math enough to look for super strings, yet dismiss it when it come to life in the universe? Why? This
isn't a scientific approach and worse still lacks imagination. Current public SETI efforts, if they aren't censored, aren't sufficient to answer
the question in their current capacity. And even so, they lack imagination as well. And that is the problem with the whole debate. The skeptics
aren't just skeptics, they simply don't believe and couldn't imagine it being possible. They don't look at data they dismiss the whole issue as a
mental disorder. Or worse yet, everyone is accused of being a liar. And the media often misrepresents the facts, and the government is always offering
ridiculous explanations for obvious data. That is what creates the debate, that is what I see people arguing about. Add to that hoaxes and the
potential of government disinformation agents.
All this effort points to the very real probability that there is in fact a cover up. And we are in fact being engaged as a species. And we need to do
something about it. We need to start acting like we actually want the answer to the biggest question mankind has ever asked. Are we alone? Well, if we
are, then the answer if extremely profound. And it is charged upon us to potentially colonize and populate the galaxy. And it may very well be the
case in other galaxies throughout the universe. Maybe there is a golden moment in the Universes history that makes it possible for life to flourish
for the first time. And what if the last 4 billion years or so is that window. And we are one of the first in the universe. But what if the conditions
for life had always been present? A billion years or so after the Big Bang, and the earliest of galaxies were cooling more rapidly and allowing for
these ingredients to coalesce, and become sun like stars and Earth like planets, and us. Here we are. And statistical estimates give us pretty good
figures for Earth like planets in our galaxy. So what does that mean to the argument? It means that we are asking the wrong questions. Of ourselves,
and of the universe. And we are asking ourselves whether it is acceptable to dismiss evidence so easily when scientific consensus has consistently
been based on a whole lot less. I just think the issue itself needs to be given more respect. I maintain that we are not alone. I have seen enough
evidence to convince me. And I base my belief on the data I pour over on a regular basis. My questions have become "Why are we lying to ourselves
about it" and "Why do government need to maintain secrecy on the matter". To me, Are we alone was answered a long time ago.