It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Timmyboi23
After somebody is assualted and is bleeding, aren't they suppose to take them to the hospital instead of jail??? Even if they themselves committed a crime?
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
reply to post by SpaceBits
That is not necessarily true. Yes, some departments do that. But many departments have a pretty strict sceaning process - including tons of test, and interviews before a board.
Originally posted by magicmushroom
NGC, are you asking people not to be Human, any person watching that video will be shocked and disgusted and the only shame of all this rage and emotion is that the perps arent getting to hear it.
Whilst ATS rules have to be applied they should not obstruct those who wish to confront those members whom support such Police actions to do so only allows such events to prevail.
To bring about justice one may have to receive a bloody nose.
Originally posted by SpaceBits
I think he's talking about the police bashing we are all doing. Like saying "if they tried that with me i would blah blah blah them..
Originally posted by magicmushroom
Whilst ATS rules have to be applied they should not obstruct those who wish to confront those members whom support such Police actions to do so only allows such events to prevail.
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by greeneyedleo
I'm more than delighted to hear that she was an terrorist, madwomen, child molester, junkie or what ever of those modern dungeon&dragons monsters, but according to the evidence at hand, she was just ordinary citizen that showed wrong ID in accident - yet she had perfectly sensible explanation for showing wrong ID.
Whatever the reasons were, the search should've be committed by female officers. Isn't it in law also?