It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Riposte
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I am an experimentalist by background. And I hate emtpy talk. Look at grand statements like "EU explains every freaking problem"... One of the items is the neutrino rate. Well, if EU doesn't produce ANY number for that at all, how come you can say that it explains ANYTHING?
This has already been answered, many years ago.
www.electric-cosmos.org...
.../snip/...The announcement made by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) that “the SNO detector has the capability to determine whether solar neutrinos are changing their type en route to Earth” is false on its face. There is no way that measurements made at only one end (here on Earth) of a transmission channel (that stretches from the Sun’s center to Earth) can reveal changes that occur farther up the channel (say, within the Sun itself, or near Mercury or Venus).
Originally posted by buddhasystem
You may have heard that solar wind contains electrons as well, which make it effectively neutral. There is no net current as far as we know. So the rest of your argument is moot imho.
Originally posted by Riposte
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Thanks for your suggestion. I would like to note, that the electric field cannot be directly observed either (you are not saying you see it, I hope), so please name it "unicorn" as well. It DOES NOT EXIST, according to you.
Funny that you said that.
adsabs.harvard.edu...
Title:
Backstreaming Electrons Associated With Solar Electron Bursts
Authors:
Skoug, R. M.; Steinberg, J. T.; de Koning, C. A.; Gosling, J. T.; McComas, D. J.
Publication:
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2007, abstract #SH44C-02
Publication Date:
12/2007
Abstract
Solar electron bursts are frequently observed in the ACE/SWEPAM suprathermal electron measurements at energies below 1.4 keV. A significant fraction of such events show backscattered electrons, beginning after the burst onset and traveling back towards the Sun along the magnetic field direction. Such backscattered particles imply a scattering mechanism beyond the spacecraft location. Some bursts also show backstreaming conic distributions, implying mirroring at magnetic field enhancements beyond the spacecraft. Here we present a study of these backstreaming particles during solar electron events. We examine the occurrence of backstreaming electrons and their relationship to other burst characteristics such as pitch angle width, duration, and energy range. We also investigate the time delay between burst onset and the appearance of backscattered electrons, including energy and pitch-angle dispersion. We examine the pitch angle distribution and energy dependence of backstreaming electrons, and consider possible origins of these electron distributions and their relationship to solar wind structure beyond the spacecraft.
Originally posted by Long Lance
pray tell me how to make electrons and protons flow the same way without recombining into hydrogen.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
[...] photons are capable of holding every type of electromagnetic radiation known to man. The Sun is the primary source of all photons.Photons are the primary source of electromagnetics, and electromagnetics is what creates electrons, and electrons is what create electricity. so, it is already scientificly proven the the Sun is primary consisted of electromagnetic force.
Electric star.
Originally posted by ThreeNF
I have a Masters in Physics and it's this very topic that has reinvigorated my interest in it. I've actually gone back to my old textbooks and starting brushing up on E&M for fun. I left physics to go into the software development world because, well .. there is more money there Anyway, one strange idea I had when I was a student was the idea that gravity is just some sort of electro-magnetic force, that we just haven't figured out yet. Maybe it's strange to think that, but since my day job doesn't depend on it, I don't care
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Riposte
www.electric-cosmos.org...
In this link: whoever wrote this piece of crap did not bother to even read the description of the experimental technique employed in SNO and has no idea about how charged current is different from neutral current in electroweak interaction and what this brings to the table.
Don't you love it when neanderthals start talking about flaws in iPod design?
Donald has been a lifelong amateur astronomer and he holds a doctorate (Ph.D. degree), Bachelor's & Master's degree in Electrical Engineering.
“I really love this book. It is causing me to rethink a great deal of my own work. I am convinced that The Electric Sky deserves the widest possible readership…. I felt genuine excitement while reading and felt I was delving into a delicious feast of new ideas.”
– Gerrit L. Verschuur, PhD, University of Manchester. A well-known radio astronomer and writer, presently at the Physics Department, University of Memphis. He is the author of "Interstellar matters : essays on curiosity and astronomical discovery", and "The invisible universe – The Story of Radio Astronomy” as well as many other books and scientific papers.
“You don't have to be an astronomer to enjoy this book. It's an exciting story about how a small group of physicists, engineers and other scientists have challenged the ‘establishment’ – the ‘big science’ astronomers who are reluctant to listen to anyone outside their own elite circle.”
– Lewis E. Franks, PhD, Stanford University, Fellow of the IEEE (1977), Professor Emeritus and Head of the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts (Retired).
“Gravity was the focus of 20th century astronomy. For the 21st century, it will be electromagnetism and plasmas in addition. This forthcoming scientific revolution is presaged by the rapid pace of discoveries about our own star, the Sun, and its total plasma environment, and discoveries about the nature of the interstellar medium."
– Timothy E. Eastman, PhD, Head of Raytheon's space physics and astrophysics groups. He is well known for his work on magnetospheric boundary layers and the initial discovery of the Low Latitude Boundary Layer.
www.plasmas.org...
“It is gratifying to see the work of my mentor, Nobel Laureate Hannes Alfvén
enumerated with such clarity. I am also pleased to see that Dr. Scott has given general readers such a lucid and understandable summary of my own work.”
– Anthony L. Peratt, PhD, USC, Fellow of the IEEE (1999), former scientific advisor to theU.S. Department of Energy and member of the Associate Laboratory Directorate of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. He is the author of Physics of the Plasma Universe and numerous published papers.
Originally posted by ZeuZZ
Within Plasma Cosmology is the idea that the true origin of the universe is not entirely within the realm of humanly verifiable knowledge. Because of this the question of how the entire universe began and how it will end can be left in the background whilst the more verifiable questions of what processes are going on right now can be addressed, without the constraints of working backwards from an initial 'Big Bang' that we cant be 100% sure of anyway. The universe is viewed as eternal for all we know, and this view can have an effect on ones understanding of himself within the universal processes that are constantly ongoing. (sorry to start getting philisophical ) Thats why I think i find the idea so appealing, and it radically changed my views on science as a whole.
The documentary 'the cosmology quest' is another good start to familiarise yourself with the main shortcomings of standard astronomy and gives a brief overview of some of the plasma concepts, I think its available to watch on youtube.
Originally posted by ZeuZZ
Out of curiousity, have you spoken in person with Arp and others? what is your field of expertise? (apart obviosuly from EU )
Originally posted by Ionized
And my hobby is experimental audio exploration, ie making crazy music that no one would consider music
Originally posted by ZeuZZ
a slightly more detailed critique of the neutrino issue can be found here; www.electric-cosmos.org...
Originally posted by NeedToNo
Big bang theory(currently widely accepted cosmological paradigm) appears to be such bias of entrenched proportions when none "witnessed it", nor is it duplicated in the laboratory. Fusion theory of the sun is another such bias when it has not been proven in the laboratory even with enormous funds spent and decades of research.
Despite its great popularity, the Big Bang framework for cosmology faces growing contradictions with observation. The Big Bang theory requires three hypothetical entities-the inflation field, nonbaryonic (dark) matter, and the dark energy field-to overcome gross contradictions of theory and observation. Yet, no evidence has ever confirmed the existence of any of these three hypothetical entities. The predictions of the theory for the abundance of /sup 4/He, /sup 7/Li, and D are more than 7/spl sigma/ from the data for any assumed density of baryons and the probability of the theory fitting the data is less than 10/sup -14/. Observations of voids in the distribution of galaxies that are in excess of 100 Mpc in diameter, combined with observed low streaming velocities of galaxies, imply an age for these structure that is at least triple and more likely six times the hypothesized time since the Big Bang. Big Bang predictions for the anisotropy of the microwave background, which now involve seven or more free parameters, still are excluded by the data at the 2/spl sigma/ level. The observed preferred direction in the background anisotropy completely contradicts Big Bang assumptions. In contrast, the predictions of plasma cosmology have been strengthened by new observations, including evidence for the stellar origin of the light elements, the plasma origin of large-scale structures, and the origin of the cosmic microwave background in a "radio fog" of dense plasma filaments. This review of the evidence shows that the time has come, and indeed has long since come, to abandon the Big Bang as the primary model of cosmology.
Originally posted by NeedToNo
Big bang theory(currently widely accepted cosmological paradigm) appears to be such bias of entrenched proportions when none "witnessed it", nor is it duplicated in the laboratory.
Originally posted by NeedToNo
reply to post by buddhasystem
Fair enough, and Big Bang theory is called a theory, isn't it ? Nobody calls it certainty