Police officer records UFO

Originally posted by PsykoOps

6) There is a million reasons why there would be cuts. My guess is that the officer turned the camera off for awhile when he tried to get the camera out of the rack.

And for the rest of you guys, it's already been determined that the beginning is from a different incident. There was no claim that it's all from the same incident. Why it's shown I dont know. There could be 50mins of other traffic stops on it before this one comes up.

Well PsykoOps I guess you kinda answered my question...but putting the cut in there of film that was not of the incident makes this film questionable imho. I would not have presented it like that.

I'd love for this to be a real UFO, I have been reading about them for over 30 years and love the material... but I have yet been convinced by any evidence presented anywhere.

Personally, I think real UFO's are from the government and not extra-terrestrial in origin...but hell, I'll be the first one to admit I'm wrong.

I say keep the evidence coming guys... if nothing else it sure is entertaining!

With all respect where do you see a ufo in that? that ufo moves so slow like a blimp!

I have never seen a ufo in the shape of a diamond!and it moves so slow!

The police officers dash cam, where is the time and date and year?

Here is a pics of the latest dash cam......i dont think a mexican dash cam can soom in our out...

Originally posted by GUNSINWAR
With all respect

where do you see a ufo in that? that ufo moves so slow like a blimp!

I have never seen a ufo in the shape of a diamond!and it moves so slow!

Read earlier in the thread and someone clearly outlines several "ufo" that are the same shape.

b

reply to post by PsykoOps


Whatever....

In the end it was just a U.F.O


Unidentified Flying Object. Unidentified. Nothing extraordinary. Not aliens spaceship. If there is please give me concrete evidence that we are being visited by ETs. Oh wait a sec. There isn't ANY!!



It was proabably a balloon, or it was ummmm... Faked? You know like the bearded Swedish dude did ALL THE TIME?

There is NO CONCRETE EVIDENCE this was extraordinary. Let's move on...

reply to post by omnicron


Well you can move on . I still think this vid is pretty decent . I have been trying all week now to get ahold of someone that may be able to shed some better light on why/if it was edited ect. I will report back asap.

Well, let me tell you this much. The photo that I posted on page 5 of this thread are in fact hot air balloons. they are not a reflection. They look almost diamond shaped and they glow. But the one in the vid dont look like any hot air balloons that I have ever seen. and I live in the Hot Air Balloon capital of the world.

Originally posted by omnicron
reply to post by PsykoOps

 

Whatever....
In the end it was just a U.F.O
Unidentified Flying Object. Unidentified. Nothing extraordinary. Not aliens spaceship. If there is please give me concrete evidence that we are being visited by ETs. Oh wait a sec. There isn't ANY!!

So brash..

I would suggest for you to go read the top 100 UFO cases thread and then if you have an ounce of sanity you would realize that SOMETHING not earthly has been happening. Oh, you have to actually read the cases..
But of course you want an alien's drivers license and social security card for proof so chances are you won't read the cases.

There is more than enough circumstantial evidence told by MILLIONS of people to blow your statement out of the water.

Proof can be derived from the sum of circumstances. Yes, this is a scientific principle. Sort of like how a brilliant man saw a deep pocketed flower and said "that flower must be pollinated by a bird we've never seen that has a really long beak" Sure nuff, the hummingbird was discovered later.

Right now the "alien" ET phenomena is the hummingbird. The difference is plenty of people have already seen it but they just haven't captured one and put it in a cage for you to fiddle with.

b

reply to post by Bspiracy


Awesome post . Stared. I don't think many people do there homework . Its easy to dismiss stuff . Researching and coming to an educated conclusion on the other hand isn't.
Not that i'm saying he/she isn't educated. Just that some things are not that easily explained.

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Considering that the plants are sharp and the object is very blurred it has to be quite a distance from them. Other than that I dont know.

I thought about that as well If they are using a digital system they would have a pretty good depth-of-field range. But that's just a speculative visual observation of course.

reply to post by oLDWoRLDDiSoRDeR


I guess I missed the big show. The video has been pulled down. Anybody save the video? If so can someone put it back on your tube or similar? Thanks!

reply to post by Stockburn


Video is still working for me . Maybe cause i have it cached?
I will look for an alt link for ya . But i find it odd that it still works for me ..

Originally posted by oLDWoRLDDiSoRDeR
reply to post by Stockburn

 

Video is still working for me . Maybe cause i have it cached?
I will look for an alt link for ya . But i find it odd that it still works for me ..

Video still works for me as well.

As for the question some of you had about the reason for the editing, I think it was done so that the audience can easily see it's a cop.

As for question of authencity, the cop's name is given, and Jaime Maussan states he spoke to many witnesses near the area who describe the same object.

You got yourself a good one.

Not a hood ornament! Flag and Star.

ZG

* Maussan said he interviewed many witnesses.
* Veracruz Mexican Highway Patrol. Who knows or has official equipment list for that? How can you discount that without research. No one is looking close enough. I see no problems with any equipment. They have different mounts and do not display data on the video. Why is this surprising?

The edit was for context done for the Mexican TV show. The full video is out there to dispel any doubt those who imagine fakery. But so far the arguments I have read are amateur attempts at debunk and are really not worth the time to refute. We can get SMPTE time code from them, but that is like asking for proof it was Earth.

Speaking of Earth, If I look left I see mountains well into the distance. I look forward and I have tall hills. The cam was rotated. The highway did not expand, that is an illusion or an imagined interpretation.

You can't just call something fake just because you don't understand it. Learn how to evaluate more carefully and educate yourself in science, geography, media, astronomy and many other realities so you can properly evaluate without showing such lack of knowledge. You just sound silly to professionals who watch these posts.

It's a good video. I'm not signing off on it yet. I am going to ask about it. I know a good friend of Maussan who might already know details. It still needs some scrutiny, but no one here can do it justice with a YouTube'ed destroyed video. You need to get an original AVI or digital file. They have likely done this already.

Looks good to me so far.

ZG

This is the kind of shape but in a longer video good as well with references.
I like this one when it stops and then descends. But did'nt land just dissapeared.

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by free_spirit

Wow that was recently added.. only 10 views
GREAT VIDEO..
watch the video above this post!

b

I think some people here need to do their homework first, because it's not just about what you see, but also where it comes from. Here's a nice summary about mr. Jaime Maussan from ufowatchdog.com:

Promoter and supporter of various UFO hoaxes. Constantly claims to have scientific proof, but nevers seems able to produce it when asked. Claimed to have radar tapes confirming UFOs in Mexico airspace. Was reportedly asked for the tapes - the tapes never came to fruition. Supported Hale-Bopp UFO hoax made infamous via Art Bell and Courtney Brown. Told people at a 1996 UFO conference that stars in the sky were actually giant UFOs hovering in space above the planet. Said this was reason stars shifted position in sky! Sold infamous tape of daylight UFO to a television network for a reported $120,000 - the tape was proven to be a hoax. Maussan has also supported the Billy Meier UFO fraud. Maussan is now best known for his promotion of the shameless Reed UFO Fraud. Maussan claims to have scientific proof of the Reed UFO Fraud - again, he has yet to produce it. Will jump the gun and claim a bogus alien photo is real without proper investigation. Maussan had the gall to call your ufowatchdog.com an amateur - funny, but I recall this so-called amateur exposing the Reed UFO Fraud that was sitting right under Maussan's nose. So, Jaime, what ever did happen to your supposed investigation showing "Dr. Reed" to be real? Beware of so-called journalists that don't report all of the facts...it is indeed a wonder why anyone would give Maussan a grain of credibility. Let's just hope a real case of import never finds its way to Maussan...God help us if it does...clowns belong in the circus, not doing investigations.

Pretty credible guy, huh?

Originally posted by nekitamo
I think some people here need to do their homework first, because it's not just about what you see, but also where it comes from. Here's a nice summary about mr. Jaime Maussan from ufowatchdog.com:

Pretty credible guy, huh?

This guy is a serial trasher and all you get is trash from him. You might ask what he is trying to do. Save us from evil mistakes of judgment??

This guy has no credibility and all he says is suspect. Anyone can make a site and point fingers at anyone that threatens their world view, religion or personal philosophy.

Who is this guy? What makes him so credible. Someone can walk across the street and find a kid who thinks you have bad hair. So what? I can find many sites praising Maussan. But, I don't do piddle fights.

This UfoWatchdog whoever he is does not even give us his name, but he trashes everyone else's. He's a nobody and should not be trusted to tell the time.

You just joined to post this? Welcome, Agent 0973-0238-9.

You need better examples to make your point, my friend. Good luck.

But seriously welcome.

ZG

[edit on 1/29/2008 by ZeroGhost]

Originally posted by free_spirit
This is the kind of shape but in a longer video good as well with references.
I like this one when it stops and then descends. But did'nt land just dissapeared.

www.youtube.com...

Very nice video. More to consider. This one has some very interesting imaging detail.

ZG

Originally posted by ZeroGhost
This UfoWatchdog whoever he is does not even give us his name, but he trashes everyone else's. He's a nobody and should not be trusted to tell the time.

Oh, you did some research? How about clicking the link that says "Contact"? Also, don't miss to check how they 'slapped' one of those UFO quacks in court.

Wish there were more sites like that and less gullible people like you. Then perhaps there could be some serious UFO research, this way you attract to much quacks trying to make a buck in the field.

P.S. - forgot to add, thanks for your welcome!

[edit on 29.1.2008 by nekitamo]