It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An underground fire that has consumed more than 12.43 million tons of coal in northwest China has been extinguished after more than 50 years.
The fire, covering 923,500 square meters, was fueled by coal more than 100 meters underground. It released more than 70,000 tons of toxic gas, including sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide each year since it started in the early 1950s.
Underground coal fires, most of which occur spontaneously, are common in the region's coal fields. Some fires have been burning for almost a thousand years and are technically very difficult to put out.
Recently a news report stated a large fire has just been extinguished after burning out of control for over 50 years despite many attempts over the years to put it out.
Originally posted by six
Two guys dont make several units.
Originally posted by Damocles
one thing id like to add is that when people hear that these fires "burned" for 100+ days under the debris, that doesnt mean open flames by any means. think cigarette. smoldering really.
Originally posted by thedman
Recently a news report stated a large fire has just been extinguished after burning out of control for over 50 years despite many attempts over the years to put it out.
So are you saying there was coal in the debris at ground zero?
[edit on 5-12-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
But could these smoldering "cigerette" fires keep steel molten for at least 6 weeks?
So are you saying there was coal in the debris at ground zero?
[edit on 5-12-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by Damocles
please for the love of god tell me that wasnt a real question and that you were twisting his tail just for fun...
When sprayed on the interior of a building, with no covering such as shotcrete or drywall, polyurethane foam can create a dangerous fire hazard.
In 1967, urethane modified polyisocyanurate rigid foams were introduced, offering even better thermal stability and flammability resistance to low density insulation products.
Originally posted by six
They were not looking for fires on the lower floors. They had no reason to suspect fires on the lower floors.
Originally posted by six
You didnt read the post. They were not supposed to look on fires on the lower floors.
As for the other...Apples to oranges..The 1975 fire didnt have 300,000 lbs of aluminum, fuel, titanium, steel, and other assorted materials fly into it at 500mph either. Different animal all together
Originally posted by six
reply to post by Griff
You know...I really dont know. I have tried to look it up, but I have had no luck. Way too much junk to wade through.
Would that information be in the spec sheets that have not been released?
About all I have found is that some of it was asbestos based. But I would think that it would have the same effect.
It would make sence to me. It was designed for the same purpose. Do any of your code books have fire ratings on the newer fire proofing out?
Do you think it would be similar?