Alien City On Mars? Check This Out!

Originally posted by RUFFREADY


did anyon read "The Gods of Eden" by William Bramley ...

Ya know, I think I may have read that book. I picked up several old paperbacks from yardsales on similar topics, and that may have been one of them.

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by vze2xjjkYou can find press images for Spirit ,and it's the only page for 2008 so far. It's a gold mine.

You can find ALL the images here...

marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...

marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...

I could link to the color ones... but that would be a bad idea

Vze and Zorgon look at sol 1452 Front Hazcam Spirit you will see clearly a slitherbe, snake with humanoid head, bottom center 1/3 of photo. These photos like you have said are absolutely loaded with lifeforms and anomalies. Look at the ridge and the mutitude of humanoid faces. Most will not see the ridge they will see it as a flat surface but in 3D it is a ridge located across top 1/3 of photo. Rik Riley

this thread is a joke..
.again.

Check out the floating boulder(s).
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov... 00EFFAX05P1808L0M2.JPG

Navigation camera Spirit Sol 1436
I believe the right angled pattern is a result of Spirit passing through as you can see the tire triacks in the detailed higher res pic.
low res:




[edit on 10-2-2008 by stikkinikki]

I tried to put this in the above post but for some reason it wouldn't work. Two rocks appear to be floating or in aerial transit. Interesting I thought.

reply to post by stikkinikki


stik, I would like for you to look at the rock at the top that you think is floating. At approx 1 o'clock you will see a hybrid Sandmarie near the so called darkened rock. Look for 2 eyes and the eyes are slanted and you will see the nose and mouth clearly. If you have a good quality magnifying glass with a nickel sized magnifyer embeded into the glass you will have no problem seeing the Sandmarie. Rik Riley







[edit on 10-2-2008 by rikriley]

stunning pictures. seen them in a earlier tread about this!

reply to post by stikkinikki


Floating?

Open the image in your favourite image manipulation program and change the brightness/contrast, gamma correction or levels and you will see that the rocks are not floating but on the ground.

reply to post by rocksarerocks


Your 2 cents, so you can spend them on whatever you want to buy into.

Those look like structures, and 3 or 4 guys with less that 200 posts cant convince me of anything different. Someone asked why NAZA wont land probes near them; because it would end the whole arrogant charade that we are the only intelligent life in the whole universe.

Surely you don't actually think that, because it's quite foolish to believe such notions as fact.

A lack of evidence isnt evidence of absense.

Now here's the latest on those images posted in the OP.


Courtesy: Joseph Skipper

The above image is a very nice one of the Hale Crater evidence completed by a viewer known to me only as C.K. Except for the red border bracketing the image and the labeling that I've put in it, this is entirely his original work and has no work in it by me.

His work is this good because he recognized from the outset that obfuscation tactics were present as upper layer additions in the image and first must be defeated to get the best visual results. It should also be noted that, although his tactics mimicked my own, they were arrived at entirely on his own with no input by me.

As you can see, it offers an improvement over my own imaging.

Joseph Skipper
Marsanomalyresearch.

Now it's started looking more like a 'city' in 3-D. Check out the shadows. Does compression produce shadows? But then again, it could still just be compression artifacts! I wonder if these artifacts can be produced anywhere else on Mars, especially Cydonia? If no, then there sure is something fishy in the Hale Crater!

Cheers!

[edit on 19-2-2008 by mikesingh]

Hey Mike! Looks like Hale is gettin pretty busy! Lots more work for us to keep busy - which is alright by me. Good hearing from you as always Mike!



photo enhancement courtesy of Internos

[edit on 19-2-2008 by spikedmilk]

Originally posted by mikesingh
Does compression produce shadows?

No, and I don't see any shadows, what I see is the same rectangles as before, just more visible.

And I don't think that these are compression artifacts, I think they are the result of stretching an image with too few colours (like if it was a GIF) over the 3D image.

It's no surprise that people keep on finding artificial looking "features" in artificially created images, if those people want to do a real investigation why don't they use the original grayscale images?

In the case of this photo, one of the channels used to create a RGB image has less definition than normal, that may be the reason for the lack of tonal range of the colour image used to map the texture on the 3D mesh.

I will try to find other images with the same characteristics to see if the result was the same. I may even try (if I have the time) to map one of those images over a 3D mesh of my own to try to explain what I think we see in this photo.

That image is basically the same as the first one, the biggest difference is that the colours are inverted.

Resizing to make it the same size, inverting the colours and pasting the first image of this thread over the "new" image we can see that it is the same thing.


The image from the opening post is the slightly whiter rectangle on the bottom right of the image. Please click to see the whole image, this new way of showing images that breaks ImageShack's thumbnails is very irritating.

Originally posted by ArMaP
I will try to find other images with the same characteristics to see if the result was the same. I may even try (if I have the time) to map one of those images over a 3D mesh of my own to try to explain what I think we see in this photo.

Excellent!! That's what I've been trying to say all along! Let's see if there's more of the same!

Cheers!

reply to post by mikesingh


Although not what I was looking for, this image shows an excellent example of stretching too much the original colour image over the 3D model.

I will keep on looking for something like the Hale crater image artifacts.

Terra Forming is the earliest known evidentiary forms of life or civilization.
It is the most successful way to regulate scarce water, and harvest numerous kinds of crops within a confined area.
Water used in terraced farming, also reduces the evaporation rate.
If life existed on the Moon or Mars when there was any water available, it would make the most sense that terra forming would be used.
Living under ground using exiting lava tubes, craters, cliffs, crevaces, caves etc. with coverings would make the most of existing terrain features. Instead of trying too build structures out of quarried block, or some form of paste. (concrete=requires water)
If the moon rotated on it's axis long ago, then it would be possible for area's once inhabitied to be abandoned, and then set up shop where it is less hot, less susceptible to aerial bombarments, and perhaps where the water went.
The moon is a satellite, no matter how you look at it.
If we got space traveling "BUGS", then the moon would be a perfect lay over point.

In my nightmares, I have visions of man one day finding Billions of Human skeletal remains in the caves of the moon. They all show signs of being cut apart, and worked on!
I never see my neighbors the same afterwards!

God help us all, if it can!

Originally posted by Knightshadowz
reply to post by rocksarerocks

 

Someone asked why NAZA wont land

With all due respect sir, could you please refrain from using Lear like tactics in referring to NASA that way. Thank you.

Here are some more Mars ‘City Scapes’! Study them carefully and you'll be surprised at what you find there!





Images: MSSS

Enjoy!

Source image:
www.msss.com...

This kind of geometry does not naturally occur.It could only one of two things.It could be the remains of a civilization,or proof of an existing one.
Thankyou for posting the images.

reply to post by B-Dawg


I find it funny that some people like to remind us that scientists do not know everything and that some people (in which there may be some of the previous group) are so sure of themselves that they, apparently, think that they know all the laws of nature.

How can you say such a thing as "This kind of geometry does not naturally occur"?

What do you know about planet forming and ageing, about geology (more specifically Martian geology), erosion factors on Mars, etc. that you can be so sure about something you never really saw?