The idea that it is a big universe, therefore it is arrogant to think we are the only intelligent life, quote, unquote is the most often expressed
idea when talking about UFOs and alien life. Everyone says it, usually as a preamble to some strange unsubstantiated claim. Everyone has said it for
over fifty years. Adamski said it. Fry said it. Howard Menger said it. And I'll bet over half the people on ATS have said it.
The funny thing is, every time someone says it, again, it's as if the speaker is telling us a
profound truth no one else in the known universe
has ever thought of before.
Well, the Drake Equation, which is a quantification of this idea by a member of the established scientific order, was formulated in 1960. No matter
how you mess with the numbers, the idea is still that it's a big universe out there and there is probably life elsewhere. Every time somewhere else
expresses the idea, they are essentially repeating a layman's version of the
Drake
Equation.
The idea that there is probably life 'out there' is not really the most compelling question. Given what we think we know about the nature of
reality, including the built-in speed limit of the speed of light, the more important question is, if they are here, are they from out there; and if
they are from out there, how did they manage to get here? There are a bunch of begged questions there!
All we can really do is use what we think we know to figure this stuff out. Some will say, 'well, the aliens (beg) from out there (beg) are millions
of years more advanced than us (beg), therefore they have figured out how to circumvent the speed of light (beg) and that explains how they got here
(beg).
We don't know any of that. If the theory of General Relativity is true as we know it, it doesn't matter how advanced they are, it's a built in law
of the universe, period. Now I know as well as anyone that the theory of General Relativity might not be a complete explanation of reality. Indeed, it
contradicts quantum mechanics, and BOTH theories have been experimentally verified. It's just that they can't both be right (that is, they cannot
both present a complete explanation of reality), so we KNOW for sure that there is a 'greater' more all-encompassing theory out there. Is that
String Theory? Well, maybe, but it has NOT been experimentally verified. Right now, it's just very fancy, very satisfying mathematics.
The point here is that to explain how they from out there got here can only be explained by speculation. There's nothing wrong with speculation as
long as you keep in mind that is what it is: speculation. You can say, "Well, they use wormholes." (I wouldn't bet on that with any real money,
folks) or "They are inter-dimensional." That's awfully compelling, but there's not a good theoretical understanding of that possiblility. The
membranes of String Theory might be part of this, but oops! That has not been experimentally verified.
So right now, today, there are a lot of cool ideas floating around about how they from out there got here, but we simply do not have the tools, either
theoretical or practical, for explaining how that could possibly happen. People who say otherwise are just guessing. All the skeptic is doing is
pointing this out. The skeptic is saying, "How did they (who almost certainly exist given the Drake Equation) get from there, a really long ways
away, to here (given this pesky speed of light limitation.) That's not 'being blind.' That's not 'having a closed mind.' It's just telling you
that speculation does not prove anything. Speculation of what might be happening is not an explanation or what is happening.
Of course, this all begs the question that they are really from out there at all.
[edit on 10/27/2007 by schuyler]