Bill Clinton is Confronted by 911 Truthers

Originally posted by blowfishdl
2.) Bill Clinton -

We can sit here and debate his presidency all we want. I am a supporter because he saved our economy.

Are you serious?

Gete yourself educated, check this out:
www.abovepolitics.com...

Originally posted by: kozmo

As a result, the typically hasty generalizations will allow the kool-aid drinking public the necessary fodder to simply assume that ANYONE who believes that 9/11 was an inside gig is also a fanatical kook.

Um, didn't they do that with the entire UFO movement? Your honor, I rest my case...

Very good observation.

Originally posted by: edsinger

All you 'truthers' believe the same as Rosie O'Donnell.....need I say more?

I also rest my case.

Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by 2PacSade

 

What is the point you are trying to make? I am not a big Clinton fan when it comes to foreign policy. I have a hard time following your train of thought.

Hi Pavil-

My only thought was that he has the ability to lie with conviction. That's probably why he is such a great politician!

2PacSade-

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord


It's almost as if this "tactic" has been fashioned specifically to make "9/11 Conspiracy Theorists" look bad... and through association, anyone who believes in any 9/11-related conspiracy would be discredited.

About three years ago when the "Truth Movement" began building steam and became a popular subject here, I was initially suspicious of the marriage between radical activism and conspiracy theory... I think my suspicions have been proven correct -- it's not good.

WoW I thought I was the only one that felt that way, I have made three of four posts in that regard and left JREF never to go back there again because they had been inviting me to events and asking me to make real weird posts at other forums. This forum was listed so often that I finally came here and liked it. No one here has ever private messaged me with such ideas.

We may never know the truth about that fateful day but as long as it stays open for discussion Ill just weed through the wild stories that Jref debunkers posing as ATS CT's post here. - Con

Skeptic,, if that's true,,what do,, well you got any ideas LOL

How to stop that or ??

- Con

reply to post by CaptainObvious


The insiders wouldn't tell Clinton, he is so inside he knows not to ask.

So he will defend like all the law makers.

He must have been a big road block to the core insiders during
his presidency without even knowing it.

He probably did enough to sell us out.. trade agreements or other
laws against unions.. whatever, I'm not a presidential historian expert.
He didn't get killed like JFK so he must have been compliant.

Its bound to happen to the next president that steps out of line.
Cancel the FED contract or fund Tesla energy or some such no no.

Both defended to the death by National Security most likely.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne


Tesla... Reagan and Ford were both shot or shot at. Should I guess they were NON compliant?

They survived to be compliant.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne


Ford was shot at twice!

Reagan almost died

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by TeslaandLyne

 

Ford was shot at twice!

Reagan almost died

IIRC Carter's attempted assassination was concocted by 2 guys named Lee and Harvey, and GHW Bush's son Neil, i.e., Preznit Dubya's S&L scandal/Silverado-bailout brother, was scheduled to have dinner with Hinkley's brother the day after the assassination attempt.

It's a small small world, full of weird coincides, that of presidential assassinations.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne


So every President that hasn't been killed, hasn't been killed because they were compliant with some shadowy handlers? It's highly presumptuous to say you know why he said something, as if it's obvious to everyone that such things are foregone conclusions. It was Bill Clinton's policies that resulted in the s#^t sandwich that Bush inherited. He knows that Bush and Co. didn't plan 9/11, and doesn't want more scrutiny on his misguided policies with regards to terror threats.

reply to post by gottago


Who was VP with Reagan?

Do you think Reagan almost died because some hate mongering family
wanted to get to the presidency asap?

I do not see anything on whatreallyhappened on this but sounds
like it might be a bush basher site or bush hate site topic.

I'm sure the black ops conspiracies had this one for awhile.

reply to post by BlueRaja


Well I suppose for the most part, whatever group has the ability
to put pressure on the government, the MIC or half a dozen groups,
it has been going on for awhile.

Hinkley with a troubled mind might over heard just talk from his brother
about the Bushes wanting to be in the Presidency. Thats understandable.
No evil plot needs, just bad karma.

I don't know how 911 happened and neither does Clinton, but he for sure
will not investigate the government. And neither will I.
I'll just be a doubter of the official events.

But Clinton knows about the CFR/TC and other good two shoes groups
and bet he says wonder about them even though they are out for
themselves and might be a government pressure group.

Who knows all the groups and how they started.
The MIC may have come out of Operation Paper Clip that
came as a technology transfer as part of a secret agreement
between Truman and Dernitz using messages sent by
Electro-U-boat off the shores of New Jersey. If we used
German A bombs on Japan, yeah they would be a control group.