It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Springer
Many experts including David Biedny (Google this name) have examined these "witness images" and defined them as real photographs with CGI generated drones embeded on them and as such, declared them hoaxes.
I have also seen where other "experts" (I haven't been able to verify their credentials like we can Biedny's however) have declared them real photographs of real objects.
Originally posted by pjslug
Well, I matched some of the converted Alienware text to one of the words on the primer graphics. The word comes out as "VMHRN". It is clear that the Alienware version does not translate to the Isaac primer graphics at all. Therefore, I conclude that Alienware took the idea from the Isaac images.
Hope that helps!
originally posted by Springer:
I guess it boils down to which expert you choose to believe combined with your own ability to look at the images and determine what you see.
Originally posted by rwiggins
Respectfully, Jules Verne required no "team", nor did Tolkien, Rowling, etc. Take a look at cgsociety.org and you will find a host of artists requiring no more than their imagination and some basic 3d cg tools to create masterpiece movies, stills and complex story lines. Really, I'm surprised at someone with your claimed pedigree. As a digital artist, I see nothing compelling about the chad/raj/big basin photographs. In fact, in each of them, I can make out artifacts in the shadows which match radiosity rendering. The blotching is a dead giveaway, in my opinion.
For what it's worth...
reply to post by euclid