Cheney: US will not let Iran go nuclear

Of course Iran will not be allowed to have nukes. Perhaps because the west needs cause and reason to hold and secure Iran's Oil?

I fear for my country and I fear for the world. There are those who are rooting for war and for end times. They have been deluded and have failed to understand the teachings of the Christ. They have turned him into a bloodthirsty monster in order to better reflect the darkness within their own souls.

reply to post by UM_Gazz


answer me this why does america have right to nukes and why does israel after all they have them ilegally and threaten every muslim country in the region also why should america police the world who gave them the right?

So who else thinks that soon “evidence” tying Iran to 9/11 will turn up?
Really I’m surprised it hasn’t happened yet.

It is the mentality that equates might with right.... and these are the same who denounce the "terrorists" for their violence.

I do not support the terrorists... I am just not blinded by our propaganda.

reply to post by Mr Mxyztplk


This administration has run that ploy into the ground, fortunately no one has bothered to tell the Republican candidates that yet.

brrn great participating in this thread but i am off now and proberly wont be on for a while miss this site and i shall return to post my messages most proberly in deffenc off iran

reply to post by manzoor


Please give me a link to a news report or any article that states the US or Israel has threatened all Muslim countries in the region. Keep your emotions in check and list facts.

Also, when you become powerful you gain responsibility. If you have the power to act but fail to do so, what do you think will happen sooner or later? You will lose that power. There are many countries that are on the side of the US but don't speak up in order to stay out of the headlines. I am still waiting for the list of countries that Cheney mentions. I wonder what some of you will say once that list is made public?

I just saw the evangelicals waving the Israeli and American flags chanting Israel lives.
Guys like this John C. Hagee they are breeding this propaganda to all these blind faithers. I can't believe they televise this crap its scary.

You mean like the coalition of the willing... Lativa... Albania... Finland... Luxembourg?

reply to post by NJ Mooch


listen israel having nukes is proof its self if they go to war with syria or any muslim country or try to take land all arab countries may unite and there is proof isreal would use the bomb in deffence that is a clear threat to muslim countries are you so blind maybe every muslim country should have nukes what you say

The fact that Israel attacks its neighbors at will is a testament of our umbrella of protection. If we didn't back Israel unconditionally like we do it would never dare behave the way that it does.

But hey... this thread is not about Israel.

Originally posted by grover
reply to post by manzoor

 

So much for being a prince of peace. I bet nobody ever told him that with his attitude, to use that moniker was taking the lord's name in vain.

Prince of Peace is another name for the anti-christ. But from judging your posts, yes that would seem to be your God.

Me: Will not care about what Cheney says

Uh.

Iran just fired their moderate nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani or some such.

He had decent relations with the U.N. and U.S. representatives, an E.U. reps too.

Now, its gotten worse. Moments after he "resigned" (was fired for continuing protests of military threats made by Iran onto other nations as policy), Iran threatens to launch 11,000 missiles, mortars, and explosives in the first minute of an attack on them by the "enemy", USA and Israel.

Let's dissect this threat.

Clearly Iran by itself does not have 11,000 missiles capable of hitting deep into Iraq reliably and accurately, maybe a few thousand at best ready to go at a moments notice. This obviously means that Hezbollah, Hamas, and Syria would all join in on the bombardment of Israel, while the Mahdi army would join in on attacks on Americans and Coalition troops in Iraq with Iran, who'd be hitting our boys' at their bases from across the border with medium range ballistic missiles.

Not pretty.. this isn't no Iraq, and these ain't no crappy SCUD missiles from the 1st Gulf War. This is re-engineered Chinese and Russian technology, fairly recent, and it will hurt and kill.

From a strategic point of view, American forces are MUCH too vulnerable to attack from across the border of Iran in the event of a war, and if simultaineously Shiite militias step upped attacks massively on the Americans as well, a sort of "final push" like the Korean war when China got involved and pushed USA out of North Korea.

Right now we thnk Shiites are our buddies, so we build our bases in their territories, in the East of Iraq. These are the easiest hit spots by Iranian ballistic missiles, and crack squads of revolutionary guard martyrs to be.

Cheney is insane... Iran is 5-10 years away from even having nuclear power. This is just a smokescreen... they want to attack Iran now for other reasons. It doesnt have anything to do with nuclear weapons.

Anyone remember how they claimed Saddam was a threat and could launch missiles within 45 minutes and so on? Same thing... the usual lies.

If the US attacks Iran, I hope Russia and China combines their forces against the US. I doubt there is any other way to stop the American empire from attacking and invading country after country...and its best to stop them now instead of waiting even longer while they grow stronger and stronger. China could also crash the US economy.

The best would be if the US military simply refused to follow orders to attack Iran. Anyone with a brain knows these wars are artificial and based on lies.

Also its absolutely ridiculous that the US think it has the right to say who gets to have nuclear weapons. Any country who actually have nukes are safe from American aggression. I understand why many countries want to get them...its part of the power balance. If you dont have nukes, you dont get respected by the US.

And the only country who have actually used nukes is the US...


[edit on 22-10-2007 by Copernicus]

Originally posted by princeofpeace
IM behind Bush and Cheney 100% on this one and i know a LOT of folks who are as well. Unfortunately most of them have lives outside of the internet and dont lurk on boards such as this one like i do, but rest assured folks, there is PLENTY of support. Iran will get theirs if they dont cooperate.
Have fun!!!

Is your screen name supposed to be ironic, or are you just laughing at yourself?

Originally posted by grover
You mean like the coalition of the willing... Lativa... Albania... Finland... Luxembourg?

What Finland has to do with it? Finland has always been neutral in all conflict's, we don't intervene with anything.

Originally posted by NJ Mooch
There are many countries that are on the side of the US but don't speak up in order to stay out of the headlines. I am still waiting for the list of countries that Cheney mentions. I wonder what some of you will say once that list is made public?

There may be some country's elected officials that offer support, but don't make the mistake of believing that means the country does.

The UK citizens were one of the loudest critics of the Iraq lunacy, and Blair basically ended his career by supporting Bush.

Originally posted by runetang
Uh.

Iran just fired their moderate nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani or some such.

I was under the impression that the quit, not was fired.
Further, I read someplace that he had expressed frustration over the fact that despite Iran's compliance with every request made by the IAEA and UN Security counsel, Iran continues to be treated like a rogue state.

I'll see if I can dig up the source of that comment...