It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WorldShadow
I am agnostic. For me to even consider believing in your god, It would have to stand before me, tell me something I know, and tell me something I don't know. Than grant me 3 wishes.
Originally posted by ixiy
Originally posted by WorldShadow
I am agnostic. For me to even consider believing in your god, It would have to stand before me, tell me something I know, and tell me something I don't know. Than grant me 3 wishes.
That would likely be a jinee, or a jin, as some myths go, these entities maybe malevolent.
I don't think the christian God does this kind of thing, anyway give it a go, you never know... heheheheee
Originally posted by dominicus1
But, before you answer please be advised that I personally feel that the following excuses are illegitimate:
2. Zetgeist Documentary comparing Jesus to dozen's of others of mythical characters. Again illegitimate because this film isn't considered by any serious scholar as factual.
I refer you to the parable of ten pounds (Luke 19:12-27) in which Jesus says to "But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.". It is clear from the parable that the nobleman of the story is jesus and he is commanding slayings 'before me'
Originally posted by dominicus1
Jesus never killed or commanded so, when in fact it was always to turn the other cheek and forgive automatically.
Belief is not a form of truth nor should it ever be considered so - you dont believe in islam and there are billions that do so please don't try and use superficial claims as evidence. Buddha could has just as well be referencing Muhammed or any other religious fruitbat that people put their faith in.
By the way, Buddha stated that soon one will come after him who is greater than him, who is the greatest. Many believe he is referencing the comming of Jesus.
Originally posted by dominicus1
3. Jesus doesn't exist. Again illegitimate because the majority of historians and scholars agree that he did exist.
Originally posted by dominicus1
3. Jesus doesn't exist. Again illegitimate because the majority of historians and scholars agree that he did exist.