photo's -MISSION - (don't ask how I got them)....shhhhh

reply to post by mikesingh


Well I'm not sure if you're making fun of me for asking questions or if you're making fun of him for his assertion that Mars is populated, but asking questions doesn't imply belief.

Well this ones got other anomalies I lightened it a bit but you can see them in the original pic>



And this one that background looks fake >



And wheres the stars? do they black them out on purpose or is that 'science' why I never see stars in space pix?

[edit on 11-9-2007 by Sekhemet]

Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
reply to post by mikesingh

 

Well I'm not sure if you're making fun of me for asking questions or if you're making fun of him for his assertion that Mars is populated, but asking questions doesn't imply belief.

Relax Novus! It was all a joke, not directed at anyone! I would like to mention here that I am a firm belever of life on Mars, present as well as ancient. Check out my Mars Critters thread and others on the subject.

And needless to say, I generally believe what John says about life on Mars and us mining the Moon for Helium, Titanium and other esoteric materials. We've had a lot of discussion on this. My other threads mention this too.

If your feelings have been hurt in any way, then the beer is on me!

Cheers!

I read all seven pages of this, and WOW!!!

As usual the members here are great. All the right questions were asked. All the evidence was scrutinized and once again I feel pretty satisfied, based on what I've read, about the OPs photos, and there validity. They are very nice photos by the way.

There were however some very interesting comments and claims made as a result of the OPs photos. Once again the members that I come to recognize over the past few months asked all the right questions about these claims. A lot of which went unanswered or were side stepped by very whitty remarks. I hope to find some of these answers here someday.

Until then thanks for the great read, and thanks Mr. Lear for the very interesting story about mars, and other fun stuff happening around our planet.

Hey there xout1! There are a few of us in chat right now trying to figure out some of the mysteries. Me, Defcon5, halfmask, and BenevolentTyrant are doing some research. We'll be sure to post our findings!

Research is ongoing, but for now... I am calling BS on the authenticity of these images... defcon5 and I will make our report soon...

[edit on 9/11/2007 by damajikninja]

reply to post by airtrax007


Thanks for the new wallpaper airtrax

Originally posted by Umbrax
reply to post by Green_57

 

Lost of places. The Earth is 70% water.

Duh. I had a bad feeling somebody was going to say that. Everybody knows that stupid 70% water thing and then thinks they're Jacques Cousteau. I know the Earth is 70% water, but the last time I looked at a map the entire 70% wasn't a continuous ocean uninterrupted by land like in that picture.

airtrax, I know you don't want us to ask how you got those pics... but ya wanna tell me anyways?? Cuz I'm 100% positive that at least one of those pics was taken years ago.


Will be posting the results of my research with defcon5 in the morning. See you all then.

[edit on 9/11/2007 by damajikninja]

reply to post by airtrax007


This one looks like a fake/scale model! I see in the other pics the Astronaut/s have red bands around their legs - this one is all white. May just be a NASA model? OR, hey, i could be just totally wrong but this is not a knock at the OP

those astronauts better be careful, the hurrican might suck them into its vortex..also are they using bionueral gelpacks, like in star trek? and lastly, some of the shots look kind of fake. like the second one I think, earth didnt look right and the light/reflections didnts match.

reply to post by damajikninja


I think indeed the 7th posted picture and the 2 first you present here aswell are from STS-109, Hubble servicing mission 3b that took place from 03/01/2002 -03/12/2002.

compare and check the link :sm3b.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Greetz guys, I'm a new member here

Originally posted by drunknmunky
Nice pics

Any idea what the object is just above the atmosphere of the earth in the second pic? Interesting...

[edit on 10-9-2007 by drunknmunky]

It's probably a satellite sharing the same orbit path with the ISS.

You can spot the satellite in the first picture also, only a bit dimmer, but in the same area, in relation to the ISS.

Excellent pics btw. Great work

Originally posted by Nola213
Can someone familiar with geography tell me what that is? I mean at first glance I thought it was the South of North America, because it appears like the Texan Northern border is clearly defined in the photo.

It is the Southern part of Australia. The "island" to the "East" which is actually North is Tasmania.

I apologise in advance for this, however

Originally posted by Sekhemet
Well this ones got other anomalies I lightened it a bit but you can see them in the original pic>

The 'anomalies' are caused by the resolution change of the photos (being that they are digital, with 'jaggies'), and are actually, the antenna mounts of the station.

And this one that background looks fake >

Don't you get that effect from the aperture settings being wrong, causing dark areas to appear washed out?

And wheres the stars? do they black them out on purpose or is that 'science' why I never see stars in space pix?

Um, refraction of the sun off the surface of that big blue thing (a.k.a. Earth)
causing dimmer objects (like stars) to not show up in the pictures.

[edit on 11-9-2007 by Sekhemet]

There simple reason why there are no stars in the picture is that a) the Sun is incredibly bright (one reason why the astronauts have their visors down) and b) that object of the photographs include a number of very bright and reflective surfaces. This means the exposure time has to be very short - certainly too short to capture even the brightest stars.

Sweet I Never knew about the stars to this day, like loads of people, Im no spaceman or camera expert, thats why I was asking if it was 'science' or if they were blanked out purposely. Specially when I consider the original moon landing photos are still full of flaws

I provided the photos to share. I assure you these were not models. I won't bother sharing any additional photos if this is the typical reaction to posting to the site.

reply to post by damajikninja

That is what I thought yesterday, when I posted this.

Originally posted by bmclenegan
I provided the photos to share. I assure you these were not models. I won't bother sharing any additional photos if this is the typical reaction to posting to the site.

Hi man appreciate what you've posted, but all the pictures are dead. Are you able to upload them again?

These were random photos. "Some " of which were from the latest Endeavor mission. Answer me this... If I sent five pictures of Aurora and one of a duck most of you would concentrate on invalidating the duck. Boycott ignorance.. I agree. And NO I don't have any in flight or hangar imagery of what you still call Aurora...... Obviously and wouldn't be able to post them if I did. So to the majority of you unfortunately your rudeness means the
"Answer will remain out there". I'll get back to making models.