It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Thank you very much for your question. It is very timely. I will start with the second point. You speak good Russian and I am sure that you read Russian just as well. Please take a look at the resolution passed by the Congress of People’s Deputies in 1989, where it is written black on white that the Congress of People’s Deputies denounces the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and considers it legally invalid. It did not reflect the opinion of the Soviet people but was the personal affair of Stalin and Hitler.
How can we be more clear and precise on this point? Or would you rather that we repeated these words every year? What do you think, what more can we say? We think that this question is closed. I will not come back to it. We expressed our view once and that is enough.
Now, on the subject of occupation. As I see it, in 1918, Russia and Germany concluded a deal that was sealed in the Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty, under which Russia handed over part of its territories to German control. This marked the beginning of Estonian statehood. In 1939, Russia and Germany concluded another deal and Germany handed these territories back to Russia. In 1939, they were absorbed into the Soviet Union. Let us not talk now about whether this was good or bad. This is part of history. I think that this was a deal, and small countries and small nations were the bargaining chips in this deal. Regrettably, such was the reality of those times, just as there was the reality of European countries’ colonial past, or the use of slave labour in the United States. But today, are we, day after day, to allow the ghosts of the past to seize us by the hands and prevent us from moving forward?
Originally posted by northwolf
For your information Estonia and Latvia were independent before the USSR invaded them at '39 so they didn't belong to USSR and they certainly did not welcome the red army and only joined as they were forced to. That statue was an insult to the entire baltic.
1939 the baltic countries were prosperous and independet democrasies and USSR invaded them BEFORE Nazis came. Actually Hitler was greeted as a liberator when werhmacth drove Russians away... So check your facts Russian Boy...
Ps. Compare Estonia and Finland at 1990 and you see how much damage USSR occupation did to Estonia.
[edit on 3-8-2007 by northwolf]
Originally posted by swesais
That is what troubeling me!!!They arent simply making patriots, but growing a dumb,ignorant mass of milions of people who will believe in everything that goverment says!As the statistics show Putin and Russian goverment have full support of public in every question that goes out of Russia!!!
My grandma told me that when Russians came to occupie Latvia,they thought that we are: 1)nazis,2)not christian.
Originally posted by northwolf
That statue was an insult to the entire baltic.
Originally posted by northwolf
For your information Estonia and Latvia were independent before the USSR invaded them at '39
Originally posted by northwolf
they certainly did not welcome the red army
Originally posted by northwolf
1939 the baltic countries were prosperous and independet democrasies
Originally posted by northwolf
Ps. Compare Estonia and Finland at 1990 and you see how much damage USSR occupation did to Estonia.
Originally posted by northwolf
Actually Hitler was greeted as a liberator
Originally posted by FDS
Originally posted by northwolf
That statue was an insult to the entire baltic.
No it wasn’t. I am from baltic and I don't see anything bad in WWII memorials
Originally posted by northwolf
For your information Estonia and Latvia were independent before the USSR invaded them at '39
Actually USSR didn't invade them. USSR had treaties with them which allowed to station military forces in those countries
Originally posted by northwolf
they certainly did not welcome the red army
well I have documentary about this "invasion" and I made you a gif file.
Soviet forces in Estonia
Originally posted by northwolf
1939 the baltic countries were prosperous and independet democrasies
none of the baltic states were democrasies in 1930s
Originally posted by northwolf
Ps. Compare Estonia and Finland at 1990 and you see how much damage USSR occupation did to Estonia.
I really don't understand what are you trying to say. Estonia wasnt part of Finland, so there is no point comparing them.
Originally posted by northwolf
Actually Hitler was greeted as a liberator
too bad Estonian Jews could not enjoy this liberation
Originally posted by colleen77
Putin, responding to a question from an Estonian journalist on 5/10/05:
VLADIMIR PUTIN: Thank you very much for your question. It is very timely. I will start with the second point. You speak good Russian and I am sure that you read Russian just as well. Please take a look at the resolution passed by the Congress of People’s Deputies in 1989, where it is written black on white that the Congress of People’s Deputies denounces the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and considers it legally invalid. It did not reflect the opinion of the Soviet people but was the personal affair of Stalin and Hitler.
How can we be more clear and precise on this point? Or would you rather that we repeated these words every year? What do you think, what more can we say? We think that this question is closed. I will not come back to it. We expressed our view once and that is enough.
Now, on the subject of occupation. As I see it, in 1918, Russia and Germany concluded a deal that was sealed in the Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty, under which Russia handed over part of its territories to German control. This marked the beginning of Estonian statehood. In 1939, Russia and Germany concluded another deal and Germany handed these territories back to Russia. In 1939, they were absorbed into the Soviet Union. Let us not talk now about whether this was good or bad. This is part of history. I think that this was a deal, and small countries and small nations were the bargaining chips in this deal. Regrettably, such was the reality of those times, just as there was the reality of European countries’ colonial past, or the use of slave labour in the United States. But today, are we, day after day, to allow the ghosts of the past to seize us by the hands and prevent us from moving forward?
I agree with Putin in that some in the Baltics/Poland are living in the past and cannot simply move forward.
I don't know if any of you have noticed it yet but Russia is simply "writing-off" states that wont deal with it or are constantly instigating it, many times due to historical rivalry, vendettas, and paranoia. Russia is too important a country to deal with paranoid states, some of which also want subsidized fuel and energy. For example, yesterday there were Russians on the North Pole communicating to Russians in space, while the Russian FM was the center of attention at the ASEAN summit and the top Saudi security official was in Moscow for strategic talks.
[edit on 3-8-2007 by colleen77]
Originally posted by colleen77
Thank you FDS for your post and I've heard about this a lot - how some young nationalists in the Baltics and Poland are trying to sabotage the argument and rewrite history to the chagrin of many others, including the older generation that was actually around and knows exactly what took place.
Originally posted by swesais
Here i find more interesting information about democracie in Russia-www.libertarium.ru...
So what we have here-
1)youth organizations whit extreme nationalism supported by goverment
2)human rights violation
3)growing agresiv foreign politics
4)populated one-mans cult(Mr.Putin)
5)depressed oposition
I dont see any difference from USSR,but maybe i'm paranoic.)
And people from western country's,please dont compare Russia whit U.S.,yes there are many things that look the same,but generally U.S is more democracie than Russia will ever be. U.S values and mentality is asymetric to Russian's values.After Lenins and Stalins cleaning in Russia was no more intelligent and tolerant people.
Originally posted by swesais
And???
Not only Russia democracy is 17 years old,but other post soviet country's manage to build an better democracy in that period!Stop beeing ignorant and selfish,stop terrorising other country's, stop killing journalists and oposition,dont scare everyone whit your ICBM and I will get over it!!
Thats is what every russian want's-that others take Russia as hole new country.Sorry,but if I see in goverment and military the same persons who was in charge at SU, I can not believe that something has changed!
And who knows-maybe your democracy wil end when next KGB general takes president chair!!!
Originally posted by swesais
Make a warning-common,thats real porno.It like U.S. isnt at war whit any country around the globe,they are only making preemtive strikes and spreading democracy.Be honest, your ambitions are far above only your vast teritory,and i dont want to see another red scourge acros europe!!And why are you ignoring simple facts-in Russia is growing fashism,there are many journalists killed,goverment is pressing oposition,Russia is insulting foreign souveren country's.If you think that it is right way to lead the country,and you can ignore minority's than thats is a pure fashism(see description about word fashism)
P.S. We are willing to get over the past,but it is very dificult when the red bear is pressing on us(like in april in Tallin)
[edit on 7-8-2007 by swesais]