It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sys_Config
9 have you detected any pattern in your experience in Psycho metrics that can lead one to suspect a test or data mining extraction process going on..such as herding.
Originally posted by Sys_Config.
That was a diversion..anyway I read 9's indiana link..on the hologram brain..fascinating to say the least..I wonder though whether if this is a test of our salamander like thinking process..can the ufo organism regenerate, have our brains been shuffled in a way, deprived of sight, and sound of more objects witnesses, can our other instincts kick in..and like the last tadamander (we do have a tadarada but shes a batlover)just look all around the worm, the answer, right in front of us, yet never feed.
which is why I say return to the documents..the answers are there. Its the original shuffle..all after has been altered or bent off the registry.
Originally posted by Sys_Config
Ok.I just read your post. fret not Isaac never saw any either...I meant not to cloud the issues
Originally posted by Sys_Config
I am aware that recenty the Brits did some projection like that around an armored vehicle, optical manipulation via bending of light for stealth purposes, or holgraphic images projected into sky, or create plasmas to emulate ufos, as well for a variety of other purposes.
(I tend to focus on the, “Written word” as it were!!)
Originally posted by 987931
reply to post by Siddharta
Sid
With this background Isaac later was the chosen one, who came into the interior management, which made it possible, that he could get things out. Following him, 30-50 others had the same carreer, which means all of those guys from the DoD.
987931
I am not sure how you infer that Isaac was “the chosen one, who came into the interior management …”. I don’t take anything Isaac says to imply this. Is there something specific?
Sid
Next one: It is okay to name the PACL and the CARET. But we don't need to know, how this fictitious company's name was and how it's logo looked. We could take a look into an old phonebook...
987931
I don’t follow – it’s supposed to be classified, why would it be found in an old phonebook. I would find that highly unlikely IF the story were genuine. Have I missed something though?
Sid
“There is only one thing mentioned: extraction! They have to explain it first in the quarterly report. Guess, the readers never heard this term before.”
I’m not sure I follow. It reads like a definition of the process to me, which would be a pretty standard thing to do for a document like this if it were genuine.