It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tonyc
blissfullignorance.
i must say i found this post very offensive.
After years off armed conflict, we are now in the situtation where all sides have reached aggreement.
This is not the time, for someone who has an obvious complete lack of Knowledge on the history of this conflict. I suggest you spend your time concentrating on the abuse of civil liberties, in your own country.
To help deny ignorance; currently, former enemies are now working together. This was unthinkable 15 years ago. the vast majority of the population of The British Isles( yes that includes the whole of Ireland) want this aggreement to suceed, all sides have had great difficutly getting to a peaceful solution.
As for revolution in America, well thats up to Americans.
btw we have one thing in common, I also was born "outside of County Cork".
Originally posted by PlayeR87
not you
the fella with the user name "are we alone"
Originally posted by stumason
The British Army only went into NI in the 60/70's because of attacks by Loyalists on Catholics.
Thats right...
We went there to protect the catholics.
And in true Irish style, they then turned on the Army and their protectors, so we ended up fighting both sides in that horrible mess.
Just for a bit of perspective, I was in NI in the early 80's.
Originally posted by PlayeR87
Ireland never took the offensive as a nation, as you said the scots hired us as mercs, and the vikings invaded us aswell as you, only they decided to set up base here
[edit on 15-6-2007 by PlayeR87]
Non-native? They're all Gaelic!
What makes you think this?
they're Scottish descendants so, ethnically, they are the same grouping.
They don't share it with the English in the slightest.
It annoys me when people comment on a situation they don't understand.
If the IRA or indeed, Eire itself attacked the North, then they would be going back 100 years and would most likely lose everything they gained.
To qualify, I am actually descended myself from irish fisherman who moved to Cornwall from Eniskillen in the 1700's. So I am as Gaelic as they come in that respect. yet I don't support a move to unite NI with Eire. In fact, if I had my way, Eire wouldn't even exist.....
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Stumason
Non-native? They're all Gaelic!
Celtic, and no they are not. Few are actually, the Celtic culture survived but even that is not as strong in NI then else where..
Originally posted by Rockpuck
The are British, directly, British Loyalist.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Ever hear of massive wars or civil uprisings during prosperity?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Ethnically most Scots are Saxxon, as with Ireland, and Whales and even Manx. The English domination and numerous other civilizations destroyed the Celtic people, but not the culture, the culture these people hail from is English, hence their loyalty.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Indeed.
Ireland is Irish, why on Earth would the Irish want to be British? They didnt, that is why only the areas where England dumped peasants remains British.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Celtic. And no, your not, unless your last name is Gaelic. Everyone has a little Celtic blood, most of northern Europe was at one time Celtic, including France, but they where mixed in ethnically with many peoples... most people in Scotland, England, Ireland are Saxxon mutts.
See, now I know your talking utter rubbish. Celtic people's are Gaelic. They still reside and maintain their own languages in Wales, Ireland, Scotland and Cornwall.
British is a nationality, not an ethnicity.
Yes.
Not true. With the Roman and subsequent Anglo-Saxon invasions, the bulk of the actual population was the same as it always had been with the ruling elite replaced, rather than the commoners. What has happened is a general mixing happening over the course of history into what we have nowadays.
They were Scottish, not English.
Oh, I see. So your now presuming to tell me what my ancestry is? Whatever. My family have done an extensive genealogical study into our history, so we know where we come from, thankyou very much.
How arrogant is that statement? You just presume to know me and my family, whilst simultaneously presuming to tell me about my own countries history.
Also, as I explained above, the majority of the population remained essentially unchanged, despite the Roman and Anglo-Saxon "invasions".
And Celtic is Gaelic. Gaelic is a language grouping within the wider Celtic population.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Its Celtic culture...... its a Gaelic language...
Celtic refers to the actual peoples and culture, deriving from Greek, it means Barbarian.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
there is no single ethnicity, it is as I said, a Saxxon Mutt.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Please, name it.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
The loosing side, the Celtic peoples, where hit in population among other things, the victors blood lines where more dominant.. over time and generations the blood is diluted and the actual "celtic" peoples where no longer.. Brits have alot of Celtic blood, but most Celts can trace the largest percentage of their blood to Normans.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Scott's gave in and became apart of the UK, the British empire, and are thus British, their influences in everything from politics to religion are the cause of the problem....
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Right. The closest form of true Celts are in Manx, western Ireland and northern Scotland, away from cities and the like.. either way, it is far more likely there are NO celts left at all, but rather a dilluted mixed populace that does not have a name.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
I don't see why that matters.. if you think your Celtic because of your blood your wrong.. Celtic is a culture and a culture only any more.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
How ignorant is it to cast aside fact to say you are something because you think such and such was your ancestor?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
My blood line is mostly English, but it would be ignorant of me to assume I do not have Roman, Norman, Saxon ect, ect within me...
Originally posted by Rockpuck
And as I explained, your dead wrong.
And Celtic is Gaelic. Gaelic is a language grouping within the wider Celtic population.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Gaelic is the language of the Celtic cultures.... many people who have actually claimed to be Celtic where not Celtic, and did not speak Gaelic, Celtic the word its self means in the style of the Celts. Gaelic is the language that groups all Gaelic speaking peoples, though it does NOT include all Celtic peoples....
For example, Celtic populations still exist in areas of north western France, but they do not speak Gaelic at all, thus cannot be Gaelic, but can be Celtic.
Following?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
You can not be Gaelic. You can speak Gaelic, you cannot be Gaelic. It makes no sense.
-snip-
However, you can be Celtic and not speak Gaelic. Thus, you cannot be Gaelic.
Gaelic as an adjective means "pertaining to the Gaels", including language and culture.
Originally posted by PlayeR87
ok are we alone i am sorry but i am in no mood at the moment to have a debate with someone who has a personnal vendetta against religion
Originally posted by Knights
Originally posted by BlissfullIgnorance
Now, I must say though that the british invaded us. We did not ask for it.
When?
Try some research on the
" The Troubles"
"The Plantation of Ulster"
Here are 2 links that will help to get a general idea of the start of the problems in Ireland. We are looking back almost 400 years.
The troubles
The Plantation of Ulster
The IRA has been fighting, in my opinion, the good fight for hundreds of years.
Originally posted by infinite
The IRA has been fighting, in my opinion, the good fight for hundreds of years.
You call blowing up woman and children and killing thousands of innocent people A GOOD FIGHT. Thats SICK talk infinite.
Originally posted by infinite
The IRA has been fighting, in my opinion, the good fight for hundreds of years.
Just like to point out that infinite is from Northern Ireland and family members of his have been killed by the IRA.
I find your comments highly offensive and disrespectful to those who have been killed by the IRA. My mother would be heartbroken by your comments. Her childhood was terrorised by the IRA, her school bus was shoot up by it. My poor mum has witness bombs go off and nearly even killed by them.
It's an insult to Ireland. Sorry, but it's true. Majority of us Irish never wanted the IRA to launch a terrorist campaign in our name. IRA never has cared for the Irish. Thats why it has killed many of us without thinking.
Everyone is bad as each other, but you blame the British for everything that has taken place. That pathetic and low.
Plus, I like to point out that I hold an Irish passport and declare myself as "Irish". So you cannot accuse me of being bias.
Sympathizing with terrorist is not how we do it at ATS.
Originally posted by blissfullignorance
The IRA has been fighting, in my opinion, the good fight for hundreds of years.
Since easter rising, things have supposedly gotten bad, then better
... but now my relatives in Dublin are telling me about something they've heard underground.
That there is a planned uprising of the RIRA, or the real ira as they call themselves.
Supposedly, they are going to try to group up, militarize, and attack Northern Ireland.
They have no problem with the protestants,
and they wouldn't be doing this if it werent for the damned brits.
I'm sorry, I hope I havent offended any of you. any opinions though on what this would mean?
Second now, does anyone know of that Thomas Jefferson quote? "Every few hundred years or so, if a government is left in power for too long, it will become unruly. Every generation needs a revolution to straighten out a corrupt system of government.." or something to that effect. Does anyone else think it may be time?