It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Latitude
Diplomat,
Hey neighbor! I'm in Galt. I was born and raised in Sac-town.
Go Kings!
Originally posted by Diplomat
Why are you guys getting all excited over your little models? They look nowhere near as real as the original photos. Either the original photos are legit, or they were made by a professional graphic artist who does stuff for movies etc...
Originally posted by JohnnyAnonymous
I mean you no disrespect Diplomat, but aren't you even a little bit interested in seeing if they can duplicate the object in the photos? Your summation/exclamation as to either they are legit or are created by a graphic artist are exactly the reasons why they are attempting it. Part of the Occam's Razor rule in effect I would say.... Would you not agree agree that in any analysis or search for truth of the extraordinary, one has to ask if an event can be repeated/duplicated.
Saying it either is or isn't doesn't really accomplish anything to anyone looking for answers, and I believe we owe a great deal of accolades to all those that are trying to ascertain answers that may draw us closer to knowing whether "it is or isn't legit". If you have another avenue or direction that will yield results, I beseech you to offer them for us all... As a 50/50 fence-sitting post isn't going to help us in the denying ignorance department (imho).
My apologies for adding my 2 cents...
Originally posted by wildone106
A kid could fake these in photoshop..it does'nt take a
Originally posted by Diplomat
So my point is, unless you are a "pro" and can make something the same quality as the original images, then why bother wasting your time in the first place? All of the "models" posted in this thread look nowhere close to the originals. The originals are basically flawless. If it is CGI, then it was made by someone with super-skills. These guys can keep trying with their 3Dstudio max programs or whatever, but the images they are coming up with look like part of a computer video game from the 90's...
[edit on 10-5-2007 by Diplomat]
Originally posted by Diplomat
Originally posted by Latitude
Diplomat,
Hey neighbor! I'm in Galt. I was born and raised in Sac-town.
Go Kings!
Hey what's up neighbor.
Go Kings?
GO WARRIORS!!!!!!
Originally posted by wildone106
Anyone could do this..I already proved it and many people have pointed out the errors in this fake.
OMG this is ridiculous..truly truly STUPID
Originally posted by Latitude
Which one do you think looks more real? I'm picking the first pic any day!
Originally posted by Diplomat
Better yet, if he seems to be able to get so close to it, why doesn't he attempt to "capture" the object? He could try to shoot it down or something then we would have the cold hard evidence. In one picture it looks like the object is even low enough to the ground where someone could throw some rope around it and bring it down. Maybe someone could even climb up into a tree to get closer to it?
Also, let's assume this is an actual Alien probe. Why would they let it just float around so low to the ground where any human can just walk up underneath it and take pictures of it? Pictures that are zoomed in close enough to read the "text" on the object. Doesn't make sense to me. If the alien presence is supposed to be such a huge secret, then why would these Alien probes just be wandering around for people to see?
[edit on 10-5-2007 by Diplomat]
Originally posted by housegroove23
Hey Neighbors, I live in Roseville. I grew up in Elk Grove.
I think that its legit, Either Alien or from us but reversed engineered from Alien tech.
Originally posted by torsion
The photos are open to discussion on Coast to Coast.
It's odd that 'Chad' has asked for help in identifying the device but doesn't respond to any of the comments being made.
Originally posted by Latitude
Try to get a rope around it and capture it? That sounds like a darwinian move if I ever heard one. In the guys email he was scared to walk under it. His friend was the brave one who took the photo from below. Chad didn't even get too close and now he has headaches. Angus Brooks from the '60s claimed one like this killed his dog. According to another member, these devices are usually invisable.
Originally posted by groingrinder
I am posting a link to the model I am working on. The modeling is finished, but it is a whopping 16MB! I am going ahead with UV Mapping so I can put some ATS graphics on it and parade it around. The picture linked to does not have uv mapping. It would be great if the pictures on C2C were real. That would be a fantastic breakthrough in UFO photography!!
Originally posted by "Chad"
I see this thing VERY often. Since it first appeared, I have probably seen this thing maybe 8 different times since the first appearance.
Originally posted by "Chad"
...many neighbors aside from my friend have also seen it.
Woops, sorry I didn't see thast post. Well I'm glad I'm not the only one to come up with the crazy idea. I hope the guy who took the photos comes on here and sees all the debate on this object. He needs to go get more photos, especially close-ups on the writing. I've read one of the symbols is Japanese for "fu". What does that translate as?
Originally posted by Latitude
Originally posted by wigit
Has anyone noticed this thing, (let's assume it's real for a minute), looks like a kind of Stargate? The arms look as if they can be aligned into different formations (combinations?) and the wiry bits on the top seem to fade out at the top. Maybe something comes down through it, or goes up? Sorry, my mind is wandering, it's just a thought.
If you search back through this thread you will see that early on somebody mentioned it could be a stargate.