It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Drone UFO pics on C2C

page: 17
33
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 10 2007 @ 12:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Latitude
Diplomat,

Hey neighbor! I'm in Galt. I was born and raised in Sac-town.
Go Kings!


Hey what's up neighbor.

Go Kings?


GO WARRIORS!!!!!!



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 12:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat
Why are you guys getting all excited over your little models? They look nowhere near as real as the original photos. Either the original photos are legit, or they were made by a professional graphic artist who does stuff for movies etc...


I mean you no disrespect Diplomat, but aren't you even a little bit interested in seeing if they can duplicate the object in the photos? Your summation/exclamation as to either they are legit or are created by a graphic artist are exactly the reasons why they are attempting it. Part of the Occam's Razor rule in effect I would say.... Would you not agree agree that in any analysis or search for truth of the extraordinary, one has to ask if an event can be repeated/duplicated.

Saying it either is or isn't doesn't really accomplish anything to anyone looking for answers, and I believe we owe a great deal of accolades to all those that are trying to ascertain answers that may draw us closer to knowing whether "it is or isn't legit". If you have another avenue or direction that will yield results, I beseech you to offer them for us all... As a 50/50 fence-sitting post isn't going to help us in the denying ignorance department (imho).

My apologies for adding my 2 cents...



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 12:49 AM
link   
talking to people here is like hittin a head on the wall..no one listens.

Dont you GET IT??! A kid could fake these in photoshop..it does'nt take a movie "expert" or a "graphic artist" you are all ignornant about those jobs completely.
Anyone could do this..I already proved it and many people have pointed out the errors in this fake.

OMG this is ridiculous..truly truly STUPID



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 12:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by JohnnyAnonymous
I mean you no disrespect Diplomat, but aren't you even a little bit interested in seeing if they can duplicate the object in the photos? Your summation/exclamation as to either they are legit or are created by a graphic artist are exactly the reasons why they are attempting it. Part of the Occam's Razor rule in effect I would say.... Would you not agree agree that in any analysis or search for truth of the extraordinary, one has to ask if an event can be repeated/duplicated.

Saying it either is or isn't doesn't really accomplish anything to anyone looking for answers, and I believe we owe a great deal of accolades to all those that are trying to ascertain answers that may draw us closer to knowing whether "it is or isn't legit". If you have another avenue or direction that will yield results, I beseech you to offer them for us all... As a 50/50 fence-sitting post isn't going to help us in the denying ignorance department (imho).

My apologies for adding my 2 cents...


Hmm, well I have seen movies such as The Matrix and Lord of the Rings, and they have incredible CGI that looks almost real at times. Hell, even Independence day had some pretty real looking spaceships. So I know that there are talented CGI artists who can create realistic images in movies or photos.

So my point is, unless you are a "pro" and can make something the same quality as the original images, then why bother wasting your time in the first place? All of the "models" posted in this thread look nowhere close to the originals. The originals are basically flawless. If it is CGI, then it was made by someone with super-skills. These guys can keep trying with their 3Dstudio max programs or whatever, but the images they are coming up with look like part of a computer video game from the 90's...

[edit on 10-5-2007 by Diplomat]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 12:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by wildone106

A kid could fake these in photoshop..it does'nt take a


A kid could make those images in photoshop? You have got to be kidding me. I have been recreationally playing around with photoshop for probably a decade at least, and I could never create some "fakes" as good as the original images being discussed here in this thread.

If you know some "kids" that can create CGI images as good as these, then by all means, please show us their work or something...



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat

So my point is, unless you are a "pro" and can make something the same quality as the original images, then why bother wasting your time in the first place? All of the "models" posted in this thread look nowhere close to the originals. The originals are basically flawless. If it is CGI, then it was made by someone with super-skills. These guys can keep trying with their 3Dstudio max programs or whatever, but the images they are coming up with look like part of a computer video game from the 90's...

[edit on 10-5-2007 by Diplomat]


The pictures that I uploaded so far where done in minutes and used as examples, if someone spent more time on it you wouldn't know it's cgi. The last picture I did was just showing the cgi. Then you have groingrinder amazing model done without no blue print reference, and it's not even been put through the rendering mill yet. So yeah I'm excited about this kind of stuff..

It doesn't take a professional graphic artist to make these objects look like they came from a cell phone. It's just a matter of knowing how to do it, obviously the original photographer of the C2C UFO skipped that part lol.

Sure it looks cool, but so would a hubcap with decals and wires attached.


If you don't understand JohnnyAnonymous post then your opening up a can of worms... someone will pull them out lol...


[edit on 10-5-2007 by XPhiles]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat

Originally posted by Latitude
Diplomat,

Hey neighbor! I'm in Galt. I was born and raised in Sac-town.
Go Kings!


Hey what's up neighbor.

Go Kings?


GO WARRIORS!!!!!!



Hey Neighbors, I live in Roseville. I grew up in Elk Grove.

I think that its legit, Either Alien or from us but reversed engineered from Alien tech.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by wildone106
Anyone could do this..I already proved it and many people have pointed out the errors in this fake.

OMG this is ridiculous..truly truly STUPID


i have not seen you prove anything other than how cheesed off with this thread you are.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:10 AM
link   
The person who took the photos claims he sees the object all the time right? Well then why not step it up and get some video of the object instead of stills?

Better yet, if he seems to be able to get so close to it, why doesn't he attempt to "capture" the object? He could try to shoot it down or something then we would have the cold hard evidence. In one picture it looks like the object is even low enough to the ground where someone could throw some rope around it and bring it down. Maybe someone could even climb up into a tree to get closer to it?

Also, let's assume this is an actual Alien probe. Why would they let it just float around so low to the ground where any human can just walk up underneath it and take pictures of it? Pictures that are zoomed in close enough to read the "text" on the object. Doesn't make sense to me. If the alien presence is supposed to be such a huge secret, then why would these Alien probes just be wandering around for people to see?

[edit on 10-5-2007 by Diplomat]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat
If you know some "kids" that can create CGI images as good as these, then by all means, please show us their work or something...

I'm with you, Diplomat.





Which one do you think looks more real? I'm picking the first pic any day!



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Latitude

Which one do you think looks more real? I'm picking the first pic any day!



I think you guys don't understand.. your comparing his model without textures ? it's not even finished?

I give up lol.



[edit on 10-5-2007 by XPhiles]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Diplomat
Better yet, if he seems to be able to get so close to it, why doesn't he attempt to "capture" the object? He could try to shoot it down or something then we would have the cold hard evidence. In one picture it looks like the object is even low enough to the ground where someone could throw some rope around it and bring it down. Maybe someone could even climb up into a tree to get closer to it?

Also, let's assume this is an actual Alien probe. Why would they let it just float around so low to the ground where any human can just walk up underneath it and take pictures of it? Pictures that are zoomed in close enough to read the "text" on the object. Doesn't make sense to me. If the alien presence is supposed to be such a huge secret, then why would these Alien probes just be wandering around for people to see?

[edit on 10-5-2007 by Diplomat]


Try to get a rope around it and capture it? That sounds like a darwinian move if I ever heard one. In the guys email he was scared to walk under it. His friend was the brave one who took the photo from below. Chad didn't even get too close and now he has headaches. Angus Brooks from the '60s claimed one like this killed his dog. According to another member, these devices are usually invisable.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:37 AM
link   
The photos are open to discussion on Coast to Coast.

It's odd that 'Chad' has asked for help in identifying the device but doesn't respond to any of the comments being made.

www.coasttocoastam.com...



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by housegroove23
Hey Neighbors, I live in Roseville. I grew up in Elk Grove.

I think that its legit, Either Alien or from us but reversed engineered from Alien tech.


Neighbor Housegroove23, how's it going.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by torsion
The photos are open to discussion on Coast to Coast.
It's odd that 'Chad' has asked for help in identifying the device but doesn't respond to any of the comments being made.

Did you see the comments? I don't blame him for not responding. He's probably kicking himself for bringing the entire matter up in the first place.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 01:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Latitude

Try to get a rope around it and capture it? That sounds like a darwinian move if I ever heard one. In the guys email he was scared to walk under it. His friend was the brave one who took the photo from below. Chad didn't even get too close and now he has headaches. Angus Brooks from the '60s claimed one like this killed his dog. According to another member, these devices are usually invisable.


Well yea, I understand it is kind of "darwinian" or whatever, but if the "craft" is actually low enough by the trees... then it isn't really that ridiculous of an idea.

Just because the guy is scared to get close to it doesn't mean other people are also. If the object is always in the same area as he claims, then he should state where so that other people can goto the spot and then maybe they can capture it.


If this "Chad" guy doesn't give anymore info then I think it's safe to say it's just another fake CGI case...



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 02:00 AM
link   
Greets, GroinGrinder! I just caught up on the thread. Great work, btw! If you are interested, I've got Maxwell and can render the scene for you. Would you like me to render with the original background or with another? I'm in between projects and have some time. Shoot me a link to the obj file and I'll get on it asap.

As for the original photographs being real or cg, the tag for Adobe Effects is very suspicious as Effects is used for compositing. Anyway, reproducing the imagery is a fantastic idea. Again, great work!


Originally posted by groingrinder
I am posting a link to the model I am working on. The modeling is finished, but it is a whopping 16MB!
I am going ahead with UV Mapping so I can put some ATS graphics on it and parade it around. The picture linked to does not have uv mapping. It would be great if the pictures on C2C were real. That would be a fantastic breakthrough in UFO photography!!



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 02:27 AM
link   
see next post. sorry.

[edit on 10-5-2007 by Areal51]



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 02:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by "Chad"
I see this thing VERY often. Since it first appeared, I have probably seen this thing maybe 8 different times since the first appearance.



Originally posted by "Chad"
...many neighbors aside from my friend have also seen it.


Aren't there any C2C listeners where "Chad" lives? Surely someone nearby has heard the news of "Chad's" photos. Who are these "many neighbors"? Alvin & The Chipmunks? If the witnesses and opportunities to view the craft are that numerous, then there has to be others that can corroborate "Chad's" story. So far it's as quiet as the beach following Labor Day.



posted on May, 10 2007 @ 04:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Latitude

Originally posted by wigit
Has anyone noticed this thing, (let's assume it's real for a minute), looks like a kind of Stargate? The arms look as if they can be aligned into different formations (combinations?) and the wiry bits on the top seem to fade out at the top. Maybe something comes down through it, or goes up? Sorry, my mind is wandering, it's just a thought.

If you search back through this thread you will see that early on somebody mentioned it could be a stargate.
Woops, sorry I didn't see thast post. Well I'm glad I'm not the only one to come up with the crazy idea. I hope the guy who took the photos comes on here and sees all the debate on this object. He needs to go get more photos, especially close-ups on the writing. I've read one of the symbols is Japanese for "fu". What does that translate as?



new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join