Drone UFO pics on C2C

I'm not sure why, but like others have said it just doesnt look/feel right. Mogget raises a good point, the UFO doesnt seem to be the focal point.

Don't THINK this has been posted before, in trying to nail this case down, came across another post on a forum with the C2C paragraph: www.freerepublic.com...

For everyone who complains that all UFO photos are blurry...

Last month (April 2007), my wife and I were on a walk when we noticed a very large, very strange "craft" in the sky. My wife took a picture with her cell phone camera (first photo below). A few days later a friend (and neighbor) lent me his camera *SNIP*

At the bottom note that the poster says: "Oh, I'm not Chad..."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also found a userid: BUTTER that has the UFO images along with the same quote story. Whats interesting however is that the poster, BUTTER also has up the video which was discussed on ats and a CONSENSUS HOAX...

Butter's profile images/videos, www.disclose.tv...



Remember that one??! Heres the thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Of course this could have nothing to do with the original witness, CHAD...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above two examples may not at all be related to the original person posting the images, CHAD. Just food for thought for y'all.


[edit on 8-5-2007 by greatlakes]

[removed quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link




im butters on that site , what's the big deal spreading the photos and or video to other people ?
do you not have better things to do ? they would not be here if someone else had not have SHARED them here to . that's a new site and i post there to , is that a problem ?
frankly , i really don't care what you think , just leave me out of your police like scrutney .
i am none of your business , keep it that way please . i don't bother you so don't bring my name up please .

[edit on 8-5-2007 by gen.disaray]

[edit on 8-5-2007 by 12m8keall2c]

Originally posted by gen.disaray
im butters on that site *SNIP* i don't bother you so don't bring my name up please .

Why are you defensive in regards to bringing up your post in another forum? If you feel like your privacy has been invaded, please take the internet exit ramp, the reality of it being that if you post, use your name or w/e, your putting all that information into the public domain.

Thanks for posting and offering all your thoughts, images and videos and realize that researchers will go and find all sorts of pieces of information from one end of the internet to the other (me I'm just an amateur).

BTW this is where searching begins and ends for all you researchers out there:

THE END OF THE INTERNET

Another ending?

And yet another...

THE BEGINNING OF THE INTERNETS

[edit on 8-5-2007 by greatlakes]

[edit on 8-5-2007 by greatlakes]

Obviously fake, but you have to admire to hard work and time spent to make it believable, but then again if it's your hobby :p you have time enough to make something great

Originally posted by kagerusan
Obviously fake, but you have to admire to hard work and time spent to make it believable, but then again if it's your hobby :p you have time enough to make something great

I don't admire it, in fact I give the people that use there talent (sometimes lack thereof) two I'd give it more than two thumbs down, but I only have 2 thumbs. The only pro I can think of is it keeps people on their toes and sharp, and many many cons.

I don't admire it, in fact I give the people that use there talent (sometimes lack thereof) two I'd give it more than two thumbs down, but I only have 2 thumbs. The only pro I can think of is it keeps people on their toes and sharp, and many many cons.

I second that , I was just bein ironical, it's kinda sick to put all your time and energy in making people believe in this

HEY some new information on the C2C site about the supposed UFO images.

This is from STANTON FRIEDMAN:

First half-hour guest, ufologist Stanton Friedman offered commentary on the photos. He said he'd put the "puzzling" images in his "grey basket" and considered hoax a possibility.

And link of the quoted here: www.coasttocoastam.com...

Hope this doesn't post twice if so sorry.

I will say I have been sitting on the fence with this one myself and I have swayed so much I'm thinking of having a seat belt installed.

I appreciate what the three Amigos have given us here and that is opportunity for discovery. Thanks Springer I do appreciate your involvement with us.

I don't think JRITZ or DAVIDB would put there reputations on the line if they thought these were the real deal.

The area where these pictures were taken looks pretty desolute so I don't see why this Chad could not give a location at least privately to a few known people that study this so they can observe the area.

I will say what has me stumped is the fact that this Chad is not giving up and still adding pictures you would think if faked he would observe sites and reactions to his photo's..... for some reason he isn't feeling threatened. I guess he wants his entire 15 minutes of fame.

I will say I do hope these pictures are proved without a doubt to be faked or it will look bad for the above mentioned people here, but right now I'm with JR and David

It would be nice if we could see the original raw images straight from the camera, the posted images surely aren't the full resolution images as they're only between 39KB - 87KB. Higher detail would make things a whole lot easier to check the authenticity, if he couldn't provide that I'd be very suspicious indeed.

Ben

[edit on 8-5-2007 by jimmyriddler]

I LOVE THIS FORUM.


DOES ANYONE READ ANYONE ELSES POSTS


I LOVE BEING IGNORED...


admin edit: removed childish name calling
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You have a U2U

[edit on 8/5/07 by masqua]

[edit on 5-8-2007 by Springer]

Originally posted by nybaseball44Gimme a break, a guy who made a discovery like this would have nothing to hide.

Yeah that's what I think. Do you remember that guy with a picture of a Seagull who wanted $30000 for the original?

As I see it you would either be fearful for the loss of privacy etc and not bother or get as much evidence to back your claim.

I can shoot 512 pix at 4 MP with my camera it ain't state of the art but I assure you it goes everywhere with me. If an object was lurking around like this one is supposed to have I would have visited a few times and been posting the best images of a couple of thousand photos on the web.

Hell I would even have had time for some video footage. Come to think of it there was enough time to buy or rent the highest definition kit there is out there and they went back with a mates camera? When your talking days what about a mini documentary? The time between events here you could have set up some silvered glass plate cameras with magnesium flash pans. Although the Sepia images wouldn't have been as impressive.

If it were a camera phone I can understand the lack of photos, some do take time to save images. I am also aware that when you are at an event ,sometimes what is seen through the viewfinder can be a different reality to what is outside of it. That's why sometimes news cameramen are unaware of the danger around them. Personally I stopped using cameras at concerts and the like as it is a distraction from the real event, a different reality.

When I first looked I thought hoax. But how to prove? What is it about a composition that tells an amateur "hoax"? An expert I suppose has the tools to prove it and the skill to spot it from experience. All I have is experience, experience of the disappointment of looking at yet another hoax.....

Still keeps the experts on their toes

wildone I don't think calling people morons is very nice.

On your last post you said you would show us how to.. and you haven't. What do you expect.

We are all willing to read what you write just because people don't answer doesn't mean they aren't interested in what you have to put forward.

Please share what you have.

Ok sorry..this thing was pissin me off!
Anyway..here's the original..with my Ufo on it. Although its easier to match the lighting as the object is already really there (the space needle) its definetly possible to do the same with a 3D model from Maya or Max, just match the lighting..

Originally posted by observe50
wildone I don't think calling people morons is very nice.

On your last post you said you would show us how to.. and you haven't. What do you expect.

We are all willing to read what you write just because people don't answer doesn't mean they aren't interested in what you have to put forward.

Please share what you have.

It helps if you have some experience with 3D graphics to know the difference..its pretty obviously a fake. Some other posters pointed out a few very good signs. Like the size inconsistency across the series, and also the fact its so sharply in focus in relation to the other tree's. And also that silly japanese writing underneath. It reeks...!

Originally posted by T Trubballshoota

Originally posted by nybaseball44Gimme a break, a guy who made a discovery like this would have nothing to hide.

Yeah that's what I think. Do you remember that guy with a picture of a Seagull who wanted $30000 for the original?

As I see it you would either be fearful for the loss of privacy etc and not bother or get as much evidence to back your claim.

I can shoot 512 pix at 4 MP with my camera it ain't state of the art but I assure you it goes everywhere with me. If an object was lurking around like this one is supposed to have I would have visited a few times and been posting the best images of a couple of thousand photos on the web.

Hell I would even have had time for some video footage. Come to think of it there was enough time to buy or rent the highest definition kit there is out there and they went back with a mates camera? When your talking days what about a mini documentary? The time between events here you could have set up some silvered glass plate cameras with magnesium flash pans. Although the Sepia images wouldn't have been as impressive.

If it were a camera phone I can understand the lack of photos, some do take time to save images. I am also aware that when you are at an event ,sometimes what is seen through the viewfinder can be a different reality to what is outside of it. That's why sometimes news cameramen are unaware of the danger around them. Personally I stopped using cameras at concerts and the like as it is a distraction from the real event, a different reality.

When I first looked I thought hoax. But how to prove? What is it about a composition that tells an amateur "hoax"? An expert I suppose has the tools to prove it and the skill to spot it from experience. All I have is experience, experience of the disappointment of looking at yet another hoax.....

Still keeps the experts on their toes

Good one ↑ how long it take you to do the editing?

20 mins!

Originally posted by greatlakes
Good one ↑ how long it take you to do the editing?

Originally posted by wildone106

Whats the grays done with that ladies hands and face? Still they gave her nice hips

Seriously though just shows that it can be done. Who knows how long these people are spending on their hoaxes. It might even be a team of them!!

People ask why would people waste time doing this stuff (the hoaxes that is)? I say for the same reason that people play practical jokes.

As for this threads original pix, for the reasons of CG and editing as stated by many here, I say faker than a porn-stars orgasm, but not as entertaining

This thread needs to stay on topic, and watch the One Line Posts

denythestatusquo- I have you beat there. I posted this description on another group before you came up with yours.

"When I first saw this I recognized it right away. It is a Procyon wormhole ET class starship that modifies the galactic DNA of humanoid lifeforms during primeval stages of technological evolution. It is powered by thirteen super vortex rainmakers. The antennas or arms are tuned to the towers erected on all small planetoids in our solar system for navigation purposes."

So, it is Procyon, not Grey. My agents tell me you are pushing Grey agendas for a payoff. What is the price, is not ten billion lives enough for you?

dIk, its real, man. Don't let these so called self styled experts fool you, they are agents. denythestatusquo has the proof. I also have independent verification from agents with HARM (Hostile Alien Resistance Movement) that these agents in ATS are exactly that, working for top secret government operations and the Illuminati with the singular goal of throwing you off the scent.

So keep up the good work denythestatusquo and dIk, I am behind you all the way!