It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by supercheetah
Good point. The narrated photo-montage of a movie Without Sanctuary shows how rather uncivilized the US was not so long ago. Oh, viewing on that site is free with Flash, BTW.
Originally posted by hikix
Things like this is why its so easy to blame the islams on everything! You see these videos and you think they are capable of killing anyone and everything over religion. Thank god they are so dumb and living in the stone age or they might actually effect other parts of the world.... oh wait, dont they have nukes now? propaganda makes everything so confusing!
Originally posted by Spoodily
I think you are missing the point as to why they did that.....
[edit on 5-5-2007 by Spoodily]
Originally posted by madhatter
I can only speak for myself but I can see exactly what they did.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
I don't agree with stoning, it is simply awful but i will say this.
To all those that constantly use the word "animsls" in place of humans, well you disgust me quiet a lot. Different cultures have different customs, just becuase they don't fit in with your view doesn't mean you can call them animals. Yes there are limits to brutality and being human, but please, this is there way of dealing with it. No doubt they view your ideas as animalistic, maybe instead we should accept each other for what we are.
Sorry i just hate it when people call others animals in this kind of situation. It seems to suggest they are less than human, unthinking and uncaring. Be very careful with this kind of view.
Originally posted by redseal
OH MY F-ING GOD!!!!!!!!
You are more upset that some people here are calling those ANIMALS "animals", then the fact that some girl had rocks thrown at her untill she died!!!????!?!?!?!?
What the f is wrong with you pal! Ill scream it from the roof tops
[edit on 5/5/2007 by redseal]
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
Another senseless, brutal death brought to you by Islam, the Religion of Peace.
Yeah, it's a one liner but what more can be said?
I am truely ashamed and embarrassed that these animals are considered human.
Originally posted by DYepes
Maybe someone in your city is not being stoned. Perhaps they are being shot to death, poisoned, cut up and chopped to pieces. If you watch your local news, something like that probably happens at least once a month 50 miles from within where you live, if you live near or in an urban area.
How is that any different? What is the difference between someone who kills for no reason at all, and what these people are doing? Why does their crime warrant the destruction of their entire population, but if someone gets shot next door to you, you sure as hell hope noone drops a bomb on your neighborhood.
THINK FIRST, AND THEN ANALYZE YOUR EMOTIONS. LEARN TO MATURELY FORM YOUR OPINION ON A SUBJECT.
Originally posted by 10538
"Oh, the poor Kurds. We must save them". That was the foolish cry.
They're animals. We should have left them with Saddam.
Originally posted by 10538
Stupid Americans. They sit back and watch their TVs and never understand what it is to live in the third world.
Originally posted by 10538
You cannot bring democracy to those people. They would not know what to do with it. Besides, democracy is not something to give. It must be won by the people themselves. Only then can it be appreciated.
10538
Originally posted by supercheetah
I'm not talking about taking away people's responsibility for their own actions. I'm talking about understanding the science of behavior, and the science of influence.
Originally posted by supercheetah
Yes, but someone told them that they are righteous in their actions. No person is immune to influence from the outside world, unless we all decide to lock ourselves into small boxes.
Originally posted by supercheetah
I didn't say that I was one of those people. I just said those people need to be praised (and also recognized). And yes, they are better than the flock. It's the person who jumps onto the tracks of an oncoming train to save someone when everyone else just stood by and watched. I'd like to see you claim that Jonathon Burbea in that article is no better than anyone else.
Originally posted by supercheetah
Now you're just contradicting yourself. So people's personality can't change? Once a criminal, always a criminal? Once a hero, always a hero? I'll admit that changing a person isn't easy, and some people may never change, but there are programs that reduce recidivism (and have the science to prove it), and society needs to try damn hard to change those who can be changed or continue to harbor criminals.
Originally posted by supercheetah
I don't disagree with you on this, but to deny that people aren't influenced by the outside world is to deny that we're social creatures when all the evidence shows that we are very much social creatures. We can never deny the influence of peers, family, and environment, or else we must deny our own humanity.