It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Schools are dropping the Holocaust from history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils, a Government backed study has revealed.
It found some teachers are reluctant to cover the atrocity for fear of upsetting students whose beliefs include Holocaust denial.
There is also resistance to tackling the 11th century Crusades - where Christians fought Muslim armies for control of Jerusalem - because lessons often contradict what is taught in local mosques.
Originally posted by infinite
hmmm...
I would be careful with the sources though, VERY right wing.
Originally posted by shots
That is why I furnished two sources infinite I am very reluctant to use UK sources for fear they are a tabloid and live on gossip.
Originally posted by infinite
Good man shots
I'll keep a look out on other media sources to see what comes up
It found some teachers are dropping courses covering the Holocaust at the earliest opportunity over fears Muslim pupils might express anti-Semitic and anti-Israel reactions in class.
What is the difference if a teacher upsets a child; history is history, you do not change it just because it offends one or two groups.
Christian parents at another school complained over the way the Arab-Israeli conflict was taught.
Originally posted by Odium
Name the Schools.
Name the Teachers.
Name the Mosques.
Otherwise, it isn't happening.
Furthermore, find an example of where the children have caused the problem and not where it is these so called "teachers backing away" from a "risky" issue.
Edit:
The newest source is even better:
Christian parents at another school complained over the way the Arab-Israeli conflict was taught.
Funny isn't it. How it is Christian Parents that are meant to be the ones with the problem. Not Muslims.
Edit 2: What report? I have yet to see one linked or named.
Originally posted by Odium
The facts though are simple: You have linked sites, which do not source their material. They all seem to quote one-another and thus are not three different reports or reporters.
Originally posted by Odium
You have no control over what you post? Well fair enough from now on I will believe that.
I am glad, you have no control over if you check sources. :-)
Originally posted by shots
I did try and I DID GIVE YOU an opportunity to present an opposing view which you were unable to do so that is not my fault. Have a nice day and a better tomorrow
Originally posted by Odium
I've given you the Government website, where no report is posted. Since ever report is published on the Government website it is easy to assume that this report does not exist.
Originally posted by infinite
I would be careful with the sources though, VERY right wing.
Originally posted by Terran Blue
hmmmm....
Papers used as sources:
Daily Mail
Daily Express
Daily Star (giggles)
.
Originally posted by Odium
Shots, your response is laughable.
If I claim I can fly, do I have to proove it or do I sit here and say: "You proove it."