Possibly Space Weapon-Building Will Rotate Every 7 Days

Tom

And your debunker statement about technobabble.

You appear to be knowledgable in some fields. Are you trying to
infer you do not know what a scattering target or what a quadraple is?

Well when you insert nanoparticles into the chemtrail compositions,
they have also added these things called scattering targets that can
lay in the composition until something is used to excite the molecules/atoms/nanoparticles/chemicals which causes the field to
start spinning and so all its magnetic poles are exposed and opposite
fields can attract and form bonds because now instead of a two poled
magnetic field, the quadrapole they created is a four pole magnetic field
Four poles can create corners/squares corner to corner connections,
just like the weaving of fabric, the chemicals can weave a sillica sleeve
and all points connect or have the ability to form the molecule body
formation.

Everything has a fingerprint. You use chemicals as a composition of
something like forming a thin filmed composition that stretches over
our heads of fake cloud gas/chemical materials, those same chemicals
gases have a molecular atom body formation same as hydrogen, oxygen,
carbon dioxiode does makes H2O, O2, C02, etc.

You don't have to be a scientist to figure out basic 101, 102, 103 etc
science. The basis of most science is the starting point for just about
most experiments. Same applies to electricity and electromagnetic
fields. Basically they are following the rules of thumb in creating their
projects then its off to the races of Quantum Physics and what they
can magically create now that they are no longer confined to their
underground labs and have been giving an open hand to use
our great outdoors as their lab instead.

Originally posted by endrna
Tom

It appears I got the words funnels of energys in a lot better place
then you got your line

Well, seeing that I have a master's in comm theory, I bet anything your source is full of bovine excrement. Or maybe I missed the "funnels of energy" class.

Debunkers are alive and well on this forum.

First Haarp was suppose to be a tommy gun to shoot down pollution.
Now all you debunkers have changed her to a short wave transittor.
What will you debunkers think of next to pretend HAARP is.

Whoever told you it had diddly to do with shooting down pollution?

HAARP and her cousins are all the other projects that tie into her
is many many programs and projects.

See, statements like this are why I'm pretty sure your native language isn't English. If you were Slavic, you'd most likely call it 'him', so I'm guessing some Romance language?

She can bounce radiowaves off of her clouds. She can bounce images
off of her clouds. She can reflect sound and images off of her clouds.
She is also a photographic surface. She is also an embedded computer
program hidden in the chemicals and transparent liquids gases of
the chemtrails.

This is the most elaborate bunch of hooey I've ever heard. It's a phased-array HF transmitter. There's no way to "reflect sound and images off of clouds" with it. It doesn't have diddly to do with clouds. You also don't have much of a grasp on computer programs, either, do you? Or hardware?

The program or computer commands can be seen
using UV detectors and 3D imaging. The energy field she creates can
be seen using UV detectors and 3D imaging. Which is probably why
they are about to build a football size stadium Megatelescope. A spyglass
so big of 100 feet wide. It will have 800 mirrors which will be controlled by a supercomputer and projected to be 100 times more powerful than
the Hubble. This same article was also on the same page as this rotating
building story from Maxim Magazine.

Ah, ok, even in delusion world, which I've come to believe you're inhabiting, why would They® need to build a "mega telescope" to "see the computer commands" They® put up there to begin with? Wouldn't They® already know?

Oh by the way the new hidden lingo to call a UV detector by is a
colourimeter or colorimeter

Well, no, a colorimeter isn't the same thing at all.

You know, you'd probably get a lot more out of technology if you had some sort of grasp of it. Did you ever consider taking some courses in, say, programming, logic, or what not? I'm sure they have some math free versions that present overviews.

[edit on 2-4-2007 by Tom Bedlam]

Originally posted by endrna
Tom

And your debunker statement about technobabble.

You appear to be knowledgable in some fields. Are you trying to
infer you do not know what a scattering target or what a quadraple is?

That's "quadrupole". And it has nothing to do with a phased array transmitter, at least not in the sense that you seem to be attempting to use the term.

Well when you insert nanoparticles into the chemtrail compositions,
they have also added these things called scattering targets that can
lay in the composition until something is used to excite the molecules/atoms/nanoparticles/chemicals which causes the field to
start spinning and so all its magnetic poles are exposed and opposite
fields can attract and form bonds because now instead of a two poled
magnetic field, the quadrapole they created is a four pole magnetic field
Four poles can create corners/squares corner to corner connections,
just like the weaving of fabric, the chemicals can weave a sillica sleeve
and all points connect or have the ability to form the molecule body
formation.

What it sounds like is someone was reading about NQR while tripping on acid, and also not understanding about half of it, and decided to hum in HAARP as part of their paranoid fantasy. I'm surprised you didn't include Tesla and 9/11.

Everything has a fingerprint. You use chemicals as a composition of
something like forming a thin filmed composition that stretches over
our heads of fake cloud gas/chemical materials, those same chemicals
gases have a molecular atom body formation same as hydrogen, oxygen,
carbon dioxiode does makes H2O, O2, C02, etc.

Again, technobabble. That didn't make sense at all. "those same chemicals gases have a molecular atom body formation"...what does that mean to you?

I'm voting "word salad", "flight of ideas", "neologism" and possibly "clang" is coming up next.

Check the archives or do a Google search. When you start a lie
of a project you got to have a lie to start with. One lie is as good as the
next.

Same with the lie about its a short wave transittor.

MEN always create a she form. They like to try and be superior so the
projects must be shes to show superiority. Names like Lawrence Livermore Lab's supercomputer BlueGene/L shows superiority
HAARP must be a she, because she was made to be controlled,
submissive.

Seeing the computer commands depends on from where they are being
initiated.

Common Sense says can't know what someone else put in their computer command can you. Yes we all know what we type but not what someone
else types.

And I am the one who is not suppose to have a grasp about computer info travel.

Debunk away Tom

Next you will be telling everyone their is no way for EM UV Radiation
sprectrum waves to be seen by any source. Again its a job and someone
has got to do it, right Tom.

Would you like the link to the BS of the UV detectors soon to be called
Colorimeters Supplier?

Tom

You are the one comparing scattering targets to phased array transittors
not me.

Try and keep your debunking straight here okay

Originally posted by endrna

Same with the lie about its a short wave transittor (sic).

*snort*

MEN always create a she form. They like to try and be superior so the
projects must be shes to show superiority.

A Russian would probably call it "he", I tend to call projects "it". Each to his own, I guess.

Common Sense says can't know what someone else put in their computer command can you. Yes we all know what we type but not what someone else types.

Uh, ok, then show me how chemtrails process programs. Would you say it's RISC, CISC, or more of a Turing machine? And what possible use could spreading it out do, other than to slow it down? You *do* know that you want to keep logic as small and compact as possible for performance? What happens to your program when the "chemtrail" blows away? How do your various logic elements communicate? Who was McCluskey, and who is his name associated with? How 'bout naming the guy whose name is associated with a mapping technique for function minimization?

Common sense says if you knew about logic and data processing at all, you'd know.

You are the one comparing scattering targets to phased array transittors
not me.

You have won the prize "King of the NonSequitur". Congrats!

edit: It's pretty obvious that this is pointless. Last post to you!

[edit on 2-4-2007 by Tom Bedlam]

It has been said by others that I'm just a lowly government net nanny, setting that aside, I'm still trying to figure out the spinning building part and wish to hear more about that.

Thanx,

Vic

The Government has created their very own CMOS computer code
for use for them and them only

No need to keep logic small and compact anymore.

Their machines are learning in real time

Uh, right. Do you KNOW what CMOS is?

Short for complementary metal oxide semiconductor. Pronounced see-moss, CMOS is a widely used type of semiconductor. CMOS semiconductors use both NMOS (negative polarity) and PMOS (positive polarity) circuits. Since only one of the circuit types is on at any given time, CMOS chips require less power than chips using just one type of transistor. This makes them particularly attractive for use in battery-powered devices, such as portable computers. Personal computers also contain a small amount of battery-powered CMOS memory to hold the date, time, and system setup parameters.

www.webopedia.com...

It's not a code.

Quit making it so easy Tom

If they can made gases lighter than air like Helium that they can make
gases heavier than air embedded with metallic and magnetic qualilities
to stay put that is transparent. That EM field is not up their for nothing.
Ask any smalltown America about the strange hazes in their skylines
and surrounding their towns.

Would you like the link to a supplier of Ultra fine Powders and
Transparent Liquids of metallic oxides that use scattering targets in their products?

[edit on 2-4-2007 by endrna]

[edit on 2-4-2007 by endrna]

So now the EM field blocks wind too? Wow I'm even more impressed. I assume that you've heard of a little thing up there called the jet stream? They've been known to get winds near 200 mph. How exactly are you going to be keeping your miracle computer gas, that your planes have somehow sprayed without completely destroying their engines in the process to keep from scattering across the sky as far as the eye can see?

I don't know which is more amusing, imagining you reading your posts in an Iron Sheik voice, or the French knight at the end of Monty Python's Holy Grail!



Go away or I will taunt you a second time!

Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!

Lets see

CM can mean configuration management or cassette module

CMS can mean coordinate measuring system

OS can mean operating system
OS can mean oxidation induced
COS can mean common object services

Make the OM backwards and it can mean operational modeling or optical microscopy

OMS optical mass sprectroscopy

SO backwards can mean small object (package)

SOC can mean system on a chip or silicon on a chip

SOM backwards can be scanning optical microscopy or even
sulfuric acid ozone mixture

All depends on how they want to apply the initials.

You want to get a little more technical okay. CBC, CTR, CFB, OFB, ECB
modes

Zap

I did not type the EM field blocks wind. But if weather manipulation is
the game then I guess you get to control which way the wind moves.

No need to block what you are creating to move in a certain direction
now is their?

I never stated they had to go as high as the jet stream you are referring to in the least.

He who has the most toys controls the area surrounding their toys.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Uh, right. Do you KNOW what CMOS is?


It's not a code.

You might as well toss it in.

Personally, I find rotating buildings to be sort of '60s. I ate at the one in San Antonio, it was really fun to mess with some of my friends in the elevator. IIRC it's something like 700 feet in one lift, and it has a big window. Some of them weren't enjoying that a lot, so of course I had to sort of shift my weight up and down so the cables would bounce a little.

It's a good view, but the pricing is a bit high. On the other hand, I'm sort of surprised if no one has BASEd off of it. It has a really useful observation deck.