It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sadly not everyone knows what this is about and it's time to put some stuff into perspective. The sense and nonsense of the Anunnaki.
Erich von Däniken
In 1968 Not obstructed by any scientific knowledge Erich von Däniken wrote the book "Chariots of the Gods?". This was the first time anyone tried to explain strange artifacts from the past, mysterious texts from diverse religions and the mysterious megalithic structures by intervention of extraterrestials.
Däniken's work is highly speculative and has almost no meaningful scientific value at all. Despite this we have to thank him that after reading his book many people started to look at history differently. Since von Däniken the subject has become discussable for ordinary people as well as scholars and scientists.
Zecharia Sitchin.
The Russian changed American earned his spurs with translating ancient Sumerian claytablets. His work, published in countless books, talks about how the Sumerians viewed the history of their creation.
In short it boils down to this; Inhabitants (the Anunnaki) from the planet Niburu came to earth, they had to do hard labor mining gold. The extraterrestial/god people rebelled and demanded aid. One of the Anunnaki succeeded in creating a human or lulu (lulu = worker) with 'genetic engineering'. The Anunnaki left and the humans remained behind on Earth.
Sitchin by the way does not claim this exactly how it all happened. He views himself more like a translator who sees important connections in modern science and religion.
Beacause Sitchin is one of the few people who can read the Sumerian writing checking his work is not cut out for just anyone. But his story largely coincides with the later Enuma Elisj, the Babylonian creation story. Which could be concidered indirect verification
Sitchin's work gives answeres but also raises a lot of questions. In any case it provides a lot of reasonably "founded" material to think about. I recommend reading the reasonably accessible "Genesis Revisited: Is modern science catching up with ancient knowledge" for those who want to start delving deeper into the topic.
Sitchin's work is viewed with criticism but sometimes even seriously by the established scientific community. That he has a point appears obvious by, amongst other things, the fact he discussed his theories with a delegate of the vatican.
Planet X, Niburu
Sitchin understands from Sumerian tablets that the Anunnaki came from the planet Niburu. This planet is supposed to be in an eliptical orbit because of which it's not often visible in our solar system. Niburu means literally "that which goes to and fro" in Sumerian and thus could also be translated as a ferry. Despite this many people speculate about the existence of a mysterious planet which is only visible to us sometimes.
So what now?
Slowly but surely science is starting to accept that mythical stories are more then universal archetypical views. The scientists Santillana and von Dechend proved conclusively in their work "Hamlet’s Mill, An essay investigating the origins of human knowledge and its transmission through myth" that in antiquity people posessed more or less the same universal knowledge as we do now. Knowledge about the origins of the universe, knowledge of astronomy and more. Although myths can differ from each other the core information stays the same.
The question how this knowledge could have been spread around the world remains unanswered.
Despite this there are clues in the language that seem to originate from the Indus Valley. The pioneering work of Santillana and von Drechend is not complete, but the door has been opened.
Anunnaki
The Sumerians saw in the Anunnaki (those who came from above/heaven) an extraterrestial/divine people, who left a big mark on humanity.
Was it only a folktale? Let's examine the evidence and clues more closely like Santillana and von Drechend.
Mentioned in the bible are a mythical people of giants, named Enaks or Nefilim. Linguistically Science agrees that "giants" is a poorely chosen word.
Sitchin linked the Sumerian name for Anunnaki, of which the original was NFL, to the bible as Nefilim.
Freemasons and researchers Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas in turn managed to track Nefilim to Aramaic; "Nephîliâ". The meaning of nephîliâ in Aramaic is amongst other things the name of a starcluster.
According to Gary A. David, Nefilim translates to "those who are from Orion" using the New English Bible (genesis 6:4). The ancient name for Orion is "Morui" and finds it's origin in the ancient Indo-Europian language and means as much as "ant" (the insect). If you look at the starcluster Orion you can see a shape that resembles an hourglass or, thanks to narrow middle, an ant.
It is, based on the above, very tempting to thing the Anunnaki were a people that came to Earth from the starcluster Orion. Such an event of course can not go unnoticed, so we'll go check on the other side of the globe and see what people there have to say about it.
The Hopi indians
The Hopi's call Orion 'Hotòmqam' ("to string up", like beads). This could point to the 3 middle stars of Orion but also to the build of an ant. An ant looks with it's seperate head, chest and abdomen like it's strung on a string.
For the Hopi Orion was one of the most important starclusters. their god of death, the earth and the underworld 'Masau’u' (Maasaw) was strongly associated with it. Masau’u could, as it were, just like the starcluster, traverse the distance over the entire earth in one night.
Masau’u is depicted like a grey creature with big eyes, large forehead and thin arms and legs. The name Masau’u was derived from the Jopi word for grey; 'maasi'.
The Hopi word for and is 'Anu' and the Hopi word for friend, food, offers, feathers, praying and sand is 'naki'. Thus in Hopi Anu naki means something like "friend ant" or "ant friend". Sitchin would rub his hands.
Coincidense (or maybe not) wants that ants have played important roles in the mythical stories of the Hopi. Hopi myth has it that mankind survived the cataclysm of the first world thanks to the "antpeople" (Nemâlâh in Hopi, which resembles Nefilim / Nephîliâ)
(Just like the Maya, Hopi speak of mutliple transitions of the world or era's. The first was brought down by fire). The most virtuous Hopi tribe members were saved by the 'antpeople' or 'Nemâlâh'.
The Mayans, from their mythology, know something like "Zayamuincob" (losely translated 'disconnected human') the name finds it's origin in the word "Zay" or, you guessed it, ant. Archeologist J. Eric S. Thompson points to the Zayamuincob as an ancient race (Chac Zay Uincob) which can be held responsible for the building of the megalithic structures in Central America. Their myths tell us that "they were working like ants, they digged up red earth and made straight roads through forests".
Egypt
The predynastic Egypt knew the so called Anu people which had it's home in Heliopolis. The original name for the greek name Heliopolis is Anu.
The ancient Egyptians speak about the Anu people as if about a completely different race, that is if we can trust the translations of egyptologist Petrie.
Depictions of members of the Anu people also come across as strange to us.
You can judge by yourself:
And now?
After reading this absolutely incomplete and far to short a tour it's very tempting to think like Erich von Däniken. W can see a red line waving through thse ancient religions and mythologies; Orion, a curious, ant-associated people and their importance to humanity on Earth.
Of course the story is far from finished, but for a blog post this is enough for now to chew on.
-----
references:
Prof. dr. Hertha von Dechend studied historic-cultural ethnology, philosophy, history and archeology (Frankfurt, germany). Ph.D. in 1939.
During and after her studies she was connected to the Frobenius instute and the Museum of people studies. Linked to the Institute of historical sciences since 1943.
During 1960 to 1969 she teached and researched at M.I.T. Cambridge, MA.
Prof. Giorgio de Santillana, teached 'the history and philosophy of science' and was connected to M.I.T. Cambridge MA.
Author and publisher of several books and publications.
Hamlet’s Mill, An essay investigating the origins of human knowledge and its transmission through myth
By: Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechend
First edition: 1969
Nonpareil book/David R. Godine Publisher, inc.
ISBN 0879232153
Paperback, 484 pages.
2) Enuma Elisj
babylonian creation story.
Author; Selma Schepel
Publisher: Ankh-Hermes
ISBN: 90 202 1962 6
i do recall something about a 10th planet unknown to modern science and an alien civilization that meddled in human affairs
is there any science to back up the possibility of an "X" planet with an odd orbit. astronomers were able to predict the existence of Neptune and Pluto years before they were seen using math. Wonder if there is any mathmatical possibility for a rogue world.
Here is the website for the Slave Species book: slavespecies.com... It's "Slave Species of god"
You might also want to read Paul Von Ward's Gods, Genes, and Consciousness. Great read. It also talks about the Annunaki, but is a different kind of study than Sitchen.
Originally posted by undo
Yep, that's interesting. I found a bunch of old books at various yard sales that originally got my interest in this particular alternative history jaunt to begin with. I don't even recall their names, other than Chariots of the Gods. Then later, I bought the entire Earth Chronicles. I think Sitchin is partially right and partially wrong. I still enjoyed reading his work. He makes many excellent points.
Originally posted by David2012
Originally posted by undo
Yep, that's interesting. I found a bunch of old books at various yard sales that originally got my interest in this particular alternative history jaunt to begin with. I don't even recall their names, other than Chariots of the Gods. Then later, I bought the entire Earth Chronicles. I think Sitchin is partially right and partially wrong. I still enjoyed reading his work. He makes many excellent points.
hey hey thans for the comment
Originally posted by NJE777
For your first post, I have given you a WATS.
It is great to read your summary and the comments posted herein.
I have enjoyed reading the thread = concise and informative...
hope it stays that way!
And as for 2nd poster's comments about Sumerian Myth, I agree completely!
cheers
Nat