It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Freemasonry is based upon the legend of the building of Solomon's Temple...
No it isn't. This legend is a part of the symbolism within the third degree. The symolism is only there to teach lessons in morality. Freemasonry is a system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols and is waaaay bigger than just this one story.
-Trinityman
They way things ought to work is that if you make an allegation you ought to be prepared to argue your point. By attempting to make me argue against your point when you haven't yet made it is an abrogation of your duty as the OP.
-Trinityman
Freemasons, as well as all monotheists, whether inadvertantly or not, worship Satan.
I feel, that you have constructed a straw man argument against me. I said "Freemasons, as well as all monotheists, act in "satanic," worship," and you responded to that by explaining that you assume i have "based my belief," on Amitakh Stanford's writings and that you don't understand Amitakh Stanford's writings, therefor, the original accusation of "Freemasons, as well as all monotheists, act in "satanic," worship," is false.
In reality, you have not disproven my original statement, you have simply outlined that you do not understand Amitakh Stanford's writings.
The link you gave is riddled with inaccuracies about freemasonry, and what I can only assume are deliberate misunderstandings...
...Dr. Stanford's work is riddled with factual inaccuracies regarding freemasonry...
...if you make an allegation you ought to be prepared to argue your point.
Originally posted by DerekOneSeven17
As you said, "This legend is a part of the symbolism within the third degree [of Freemasonry]." Therefor, "Freemasonry is based upon the legend of the building of Solomon's Temple." Amitakh did not write that it was solely or exclusively based on this legend, simply, that it is.
What i want you to do is to elaborate on your own accusations and explain, why, specifically, you feel that way
However, according to their history, the society was fully established during the time of the building of King Solomon's Temple...
Since its own history is corrupted beyond recognition and its historians refuse to correct it...
It should be noted that present-day Freemasons claim in a higher degree that they have found the lost Word of God. This word is given to candidates for the Holy Royal Arch. That word is "jah-bul-on", which is believed to be "jah" for the Hebrew god Yahweh; "bul" for the ancient Canaanite fertility god Baal and Devil; "on" for the Egyptian god of the underworld called Osiris...
Freemasonry is based upon the legend of the building of Solomon's Temple
None of your allegations, as the proxy of Dr. Stanford, against freemasonry, are provable.
This is a semantic argument. However as the building of King Solomons temple is hardly mentioned in the three degrees of Craft masonry, as an incidental part of the 3rd degree, it is entirely misleading.
...And thus, in the first degree of speculative Masonry, the Entered Apprentice receives these simple implements, as the emblematic working tools of his profession, with their appropriate symbolical instruction. To the operative mason their mechanical and practical use alone is signified, and nothing more of value does their presence convey to his mind. To the speculative Mason the sight of them is suggestive of far nobler and sublimer thoughts; they teach him to measure, not stones, but time; not to smooth and polish the marble for the builder's use, but to purify and cleanse his heart from every vice and imperfection that would render it unfit for a place in the spiritual temple of his body...
...The stones, having been prepared by the Apprentices 60 (for hereafter, in speaking of the workmen of the temple, I shall use the equivalent appellations of the more modern Masons), were now to be deposited in their destined places in the building, and the massive walls were to be erected. For these purposes implements of a higher and more complicated character than the gauge and gavel were necessary. The square was required to fit the joints with sufficient accuracy, the level to run the courses in a horizontal line, and the plumb to erect the whole with due regard to perfect perpendicularity. This portion of the labor finds its symbolism in the second degree of the speculative science, and in applying this symbolism we still continue to refer to the idea of erecting a spiritual temple in the heart...
...In the third degree the symbolic allusions to the temple of Solomon, and the implements of Masonry employed in its construction, are extended and fully completed. At the building of that edifice, we have already seen that one class of the workmen was employed in the preparation of the materials, while another was engaged in placing those materials in their proper position. But there was a third and higher class,--the master workmen,--whose duty it was to superintend the two other classes, and to see that the stones were not only duly prepared, but that the most exact accuracy had been observed in giving to them their true juxtaposition in the edifice...
It should be noted that present-day Freemasons claim in a higher degree that they have found the lost Word of God. This word is given to candidates for the Holy Royal Arch. That word is "jah-bul-on", which is believed to be "jah" for the Hebrew god Yahweh; "bul" for the ancient Canaanite fertility god Baal and Devil; "on" for the Egyptian god of the underworld called Osiris...
- Amitakh Stanford , www.xeeatwelve.net...
That word is alleged to be used in Royal Arch Masonry. However RA masonry is just one side order among many, and by focussing on this aspect of the Craft Dr. Stanford by implication acknowledges that freemasonry is defined as something greater than the three Craft degrees.
-Trinityman
The use of the phrase 'which is believed to be' is meaningless without a reference as to who believes it.
-Trinityman
I feel it is obvious that the the supposed word is presented to Freemasons, therefor, Freemasons are the ones who believe it to be the actual "word of God.
This "word of god" presented as "jah-bul-on" is another Freemason Weisshaupt-like deception to trick some candidates into thinking the search for the word is concluded. But, "jah-bul-on" is only another substituted word. The search for the lost Word secretly continues...
www.xeeatwelve.net...
Many of the inaccurracies stem from an assumption that the traditional history of freemasonry is either 'regarded as' or 'is in reality' an accurate history... Freemasonry is symbolic, and the story of Hiram Abiff (for example) is widely regarded as a myth...
...most mainstream scholars agree that speculative freemasonry evolved in the 17th and 18th centuries in the UK...
-Trinityman
"...Beyond myth, there is a distinct absence of documentation as to Freemasonry’s origins, which has led to a great deal of speculation among historians and pseudo-historians alike, both from within and from outside the fraternity. Hundreds of books have been written on the subject. Much of the content of these books is highly speculative, and the precise origins of Freemasonry may very well be permanently lost to history...
...The origin of Freemasonry has variously been attributed to:
King Solomon, and the construction of the Temple at Jerusalem,
Euclid, or Pythagoras..."
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by DerekOneSeven17
You have still, even using your "straw man," tactic of attacking Amitakh Stanford, have not disproven my original statement, that "Freemasons, as well as all monotheists, whether inadvertantly or not, worship Satan."
Originally posted by DerekOneSeven17
Tamahu, I responded to a similar question here : www.abovetopsecret.com... . I will reitterate, with some brief revisions...
I ask you this, who created the cycle of birth and death, which causes so much suffering, in the first place?
The system of Karma, instituted by the demiurge, is in fact evil
and, basically, forces the participant to collect irrepayable debts over their incarnations. By being born over and over again, and having your memory "wiped," of your past lives, you are coerced into making the same mistakes over and over, thus being forced to accumulate more and more bad karma and enslaving yourself in the seemingly never ending cycle of reincarnation.
The Yellow Book
"When repentance is absolute, punishment is unnecessary." - Samael Aun Weor
CONCLUSION OF THIRTY-FIVE BUDDHAS PRACTICE
"The power of the mantra, the power of the names of the Thirty-five Buddhas and the beams emitted by them completely purify all the defilements, negative karma and downfalls. All the negativities collected during beginningless rebirths have been completely purified. Your mental continuum becomes completely pure.
"In emptiness there is no I, there is no action of creating negative karma, there is no negative karma created."
Perhaps this article that Amitakh Stanford has written called, "The Spirit World," will interest you, as she further explains how Karma is an evil tool of the evil demiurge.
You can read it here : www.xeeatwelve.net...
Evil exists in"rebellion," from the original creation which was usurped, in this realm, by the "error," of evil. The "god," of the physical universe is evil. The "god," of this universe is NOT the True God of the Light. The Light had never wanted for evil to ever exist. I believe this article "The Eight Evil Minds," by Amitakh Stanford, gives a good, though simplified due to us being forced to use our physical minds, explanation of the origins of evil.
Also, Tamahu, please stop double and triple spacing every line you write. It unneccearily takes up space on the page. I have no problem with visibly seperating your thoughts, i do it myself, but it is unneccesary to use double and tripple spaces for almost ever line.
"AIN SOPH is the second aspect (of the Absolute); it is where a certain manifestation already exists...
A divine Ray exists within the human being. That Ray wants to return back into its own Star that has always smiled upon it.
The Star that guides our interior is a super divine Atom from the Abstract Absolute Space. The Kabbalistic name of that Atom is the sacred Ain Soph." - Tarot and Kabbalah
"The Interior Elohim is the ray that emanates from Aelohim. Aelohim is the Omnimerciful, the Cosmic Common Eternal Father, the Abstract Absolute Space... Aelohim is the infinitude that sustains all." - The Pistis Sophia Unveiled
"Absolute Perfection is needed in order to not fall from the Bosom of AElohim. Any longing, as insignificant as it could be, for a separate existence or to be someone, is enough to cause one to be self released from the AElohim, and to fall under the Reign of the Demiurge Creator."
"We must make a specific differentiation between the Ain Soph and the Ain Soph Paranishpanna: In the Ain Soph, interior Self-realization does not exist, but in the Ain Soph Paranishpanna, interior Self-realization does exist." - Tarot and Kabbalah
Originally posted by DerekOneSeven17
According to the "The Symbolism of Freemasonry," by Albert G. Mackey, the basis of the first 3 degrees seem to revolve around the symbolic building of Solomon's Temple.
Originally posted by Trinityman
You see, you do understand really. Freemasonry is symbolic. However just to clarify, in both the first and second degrees of freemasonry there is no mention whatsoever of King Solomon's Temple. In the third degree there is mention of the construction, but the main thrust of the mystery is about a different story entirely.
Originally posted by DerekOneSeven17
Amitakh writes that "present-day Freemasons claim in a higher degree that they have found the lost Word of God. This word is given to candidates for the Holy Royal Arch." Dr. Stanford even specifies that "this word is given to candidates for the Holy Royal Arch." You are entitled to your opinions about what you perceive to be Amitakh's generalization of Freemasonry, but the truth is, as you have even written yourself (in bold), that this word is given to Freemasons as the supposed "lost word of god."
Since the article is about Freemasonry and the following paragraph reads...I feel it is obvious that the the supposed word is presented to Freemasons, therefor, Freemasons are the ones who believe it to be the actual "word of God.
This "word of god" presented as "jah-bul-on" is another Freemason Weisshaupt-like deception to trick some candidates into thinking the search for the word is concluded. But, "jah-bul-on" is only another substituted word. The search for the lost Word secretly continues...
www.xeeatwelve.net...
Anyway, i am curious Trinityman, you say that the "word is something else." Since you seem to portray youself as so concerned with the truth, can you elaborate as to what the supposed actual "Word," is? Is it "ma-ha-bon ?"
Many of the inaccurracies stem from an assumption that the traditional history of freemasonry is either 'regarded as' or 'is in reality' an accurate history... Freemasonry is symbolic, and the story of Hiram Abiff (for example) is widely regarded as a myth...
...most mainstream scholars agree that speculative freemasonry evolved in the 17th and 18th centuries in the UK...
-Trinityman
"...Beyond myth, there is a distinct absence of documentation as to Freemasonry’s origins, which has led to a great deal of speculation among historians and pseudo-historians alike, both from within and from outside the fraternity. Hundreds of books have been written on the subject. Much of the content of these books is highly speculative, and the precise origins of Freemasonry may very well be permanently lost to history...
...The origin of Freemasonry has variously been attributed to:
King Solomon, and the construction of the Temple at Jerusalem,
Euclid, or Pythagoras..."
en.wikipedia.org...
The Patriarchal Religion, Moses, the Pagan Mysteries, The Essenes, The Culdees, The Druids, The Gypsies, or the Rosicrucians[2]
the intellectual descendants of Noah[3]
an institutional outgrowth of the medieval guilds of stonemasons, [4][5]
a direct descendant of the "Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem" (the Knights Templar)[3][6]
an offshoot of the ancient mystery schools,[7]
an administrative arm of the Priory of Sion,[8]
the intellectual descendants of the Roman Collegia[9]
the intellectual descendants of the Comacine masters[10]
the German Steinmetzen, or the French Compagnonage[2]
Oliver Cromwell, or the Stuart Pretender to the British Crown; Lord Francis Bacon, Viscount St. Alban, Baron Verulam[2]
Sir Christopher Wren and the rebuilding of St. Paul's Cathedral[2]
survivor of late 17th Century, enlightenment period, fashion for fraternal bodies with no real connections at all to earlier organizations (although various documents pre-dating the 17th Century tend to disprove this theory).
en.wikipedia.org...
The scant evidence that is available, points to the origins of Freemasonry as a fraternity that simply evolved out of the Operative Lodges of the middle ages.
en.wikipedia.org...
Since the precise origins, "may very well be lost to history," the actual origins are not known to you, i assume. Therefor, i assume, you really do not know whether or not "the society was fully established during the time of the building of King Solomon's Temple..."
The origins of Freemasonry are the subject of great debate. That there is a connection with the operative stonemasons who built the great medieval cathedrals and castles is generally accepted by Masonic historians – but whether that connection was direct or indirect is the subject of speculation.
Originally posted by DerekOneSeven17
The last sentence should read, in full (it was shortened due to the character limit)...
Therefor, i assume, you really do not know whether or not "the society was fully established during the time of the building of King Solomon's Temple..." or that, "...its own history is corrupted beyond recognition and its historians refuse to correct it..."
You have still, even using your "straw man," tactic of attacking Amitakh Stanford, have not disproven my original statement, that "Freemasons, as well as all monotheists, whether inadvertantly or not, worship Satan."
Finally, just as an aside, how can someone 'inadvertantly' worship a different deity to the one they intend. As there is only one God IMO how could I worship another? Based on this assertion how does anyone truly know to whom they are praying?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Actually, in American ritual, the Temple is mentioned throughout each of the degrees, especially in the Second Degree, although the First Degree Lecture has many allusions.
Freemasonry is based upon the legend of the building of Solomon's Temple...
Originally posted by pepsi78
Simbols........
I like to point out that simbols allways resemble something.
When masons say massonary is simbolic their right, and since every simbol means something I would say that masons belive in simbols.
There is no other fraternity on earth with as many simbols as the masons.
All the simbols in masonary resemble simbols from religion.
In colclusion masonary is a gathering where people come to talk about religios simbols and meanings.
Would any one say as a mason"we don't belive in our simbols?"
So in colclusion again, I'll add a bit on my above quoting, masonary is a gathering where people come to talk about religios simbols and meanings of "which they belive in."
So in conclusion, masonary is a religion
My god, this is so simple, kids stuff, any one would understand.
A symbol is representative of something else, so it is more true to say that masons believe what the symbol represents rather than the symbol itself.
I don't believe in the ring per se, and I certainly don't worship it.
Is that true? What other fraternities have you researched?
I'm afraid I can't agree with this. All of the stonemason's tools that we moralize upon are not used in any religion that I know of so I would say that's not true.
Yes, me. See above about symbols.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Will you please give an example, I belive that if not all most all of them have religios meanings.
The Gavel represents the force of conscience, which should keep down all vain and unbecoming thoughts which might obtrude during any of the aforementioned periods...
The Chisel points out to us the advantages of education, by which means alone we are rendered fit members of regularly organised Society.
The Square teaches morality, the Level equality, and the Plumb Rule justness and uprightness of life and actions.
Emulation Ritual
So let's get in strait, masons belive in the meaning of their symbols.
Freemasonry is based upon the legend of the building of Solomon's Temple...
As it is you you have come here and asserted that freemasons, inadvertantly or not, worship satan don't you think it is behoven upon you to make your case...
...how can someone 'inadvertantly' worship a different deity to the one they intend. As there is only one God IMO how could I worship another? Based on this assertion how does anyone truly know to whom they are praying?..
-Trinityman
Who created it [death]?
We did(this might make much more sense by the end of this post).
Nonetheless, perhaps you can ask your Inner Being in a state of Meditative Ecstacy, and find out directly; instead of just believing in what Amitakh Stanford has to write(that is if you haven't already done so).
Did Amitakh Stanford write that this is possible, and teach the way that it can be done?
-Tamahu
In truth, the system of Karma and reincarnation, instituted by the demiurge, is in fact evil and, and, basically, forces the participant to collect irrepayable debts over their incarnations. By being born over and over again, and having your memory "wiped," of your past lives, you are coerced into making the same mistakes over and over, thus being forced to accumulate more and more bad karma and enslaving yourself in the seemingly never ending cycle of reincarnation.