It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defcon5
So which was it, it was getting closer, or further?
Originally posted by A SINCLAIR
Seriously Defcon... I think most of us can tell the difference of fixed wing aircraft movement and something else. Go debunk somewhere else! I am not trying to be a jerk but after a while it gets annoying..if we are talking about a lady in her 60's then conjecture is fine..but Aircraft is really fairly easy to identiy especially over a lake where sound is AMPLIFIED.
AS
Originally posted by AgainstSecrecy
Originally posted by defcon5
Wow…
So now I am a government agent/debunker…
Makes you look like quite uninformed since so many folks on this site know what I do for a living. Perhaps you should look around some, and you can find out the truth too, the truth is out there…
Since you feel you have to defend yourself, you must count yourself in.
People only defend themselfs if they feel they have to...
Originally posted by groingrinder
I am not buying the "airplane landing light theory" and here is why. Traffic patterns do not bring airplanes in for miles low over water. Even when planes are only several miles from the airport, they are still thousands of feet up in the air.
Originally posted by Frozenthought
Go to Google Maps and type in Eastlake OHIO, I filemed these right on the Shore of Lake Erie in Eastlake
Originally posted by defcon5
You know considering I have never made it a big secret on this board what I do for a living now a days, I am wondering at what point that I should consider your very ignorant remarks a personal attack?
Funny how those that debunk UFO’s never seem get support from the board Mods.
I guess that if this continues unabated ill have little choice but to defend myself and make a public fool out of you.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by groingrinder
I am not buying the "airplane landing light theory" and here is why. Traffic patterns do not bring airplanes in for miles low over water. Even when planes are only several miles from the airport, they are still thousands of feet up in the air.
But when your dealing with a large body of water your dealing with the curve of the earth. Same way you see the mast on a sailboat for quite awhile before seeing the body of the ship. Considering that those masts are often a hundred feet tall on a large ship, and yet thin, its amazing that the curve is that apparent over even a few miles.
Originally posted by AgainstSecrecy
You know my friend...I don't feel the need to participate in flamewars, especially not on ATS. This is not a junkboard, this is a serious and credible board. If you want to troll, then feel free to do that somewhere else. Your postings are getting more and more annoying.
Originally posted by groingrinder
You obviously refuse to look up in the sky to observe ACTUAL AIRPORT TRAFFIC!! THE Earth does not curve any differently over a body of water than it does over land.
Originally posted by groingrinder
You may bluff somebody younger, or those who casually look up at the sky from time to time.
Originally posted by groingrinder
At no point will the plane appear to be anywhere near the surface of the water.
Originally posted by lurkinginthedark
you know those huge, rotating lights they have at airports, that act sort of like lighthouses, that just spin around and around and around, that are like extremely powerful flood lights. I cant explain it very well but I am sure you know what I mean.
yes?
Originally posted by whos_out_there
IF this was a plane, AND if this was some runway at a airport that was supposed to land, THEN, why in the world are there no LIGHTS on the RUNWAY??????
Originally posted by whos_out_there
AND for that matter if this was a plane WHERE are the blinking lights that are around the plane.