It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Well, without getting into my diatribe again, let me just state that the book of Revelation needs to be considered in the context of the ancient mind, not the present.
Originally posted by whaaa
So should the Bible in General be considered in the context of the ancient mind. I am always amazed by those that say they take the Bible literally, but when the Book of Revelations is discussed, they change their tune and say it is symbolic.
And The_unravelled, you are not a nutcase and your interpretation has as much validity as the so called "Bible Scholars" when it comes to the book of Revelations.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Well, without getting into my diatribe again, let me just state that the book of Revelation needs to be considered in the context of the ancient mind, not the present.
Now, if one looks at this phrase, "The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast," it would certainly seem that these kings are either killed or dethroned relatively quickly.
However, this "one hour" statement could be literal or it could mean for a period of one year. Now, it would seem that any uprising, assuming it to be civilian, would take longer than one hour to overthrow ten governments.
I suspect that this election, in preclude to the coming 2012 election, will be very important.. We don't need someone who is going to be overpowering, but we also don't need an individual that is a weak, whimpering gratuitous individual either.
Originally posted by The_unraveller
I think the 200 million might be a exaggeration.
Originally posted by The_unraveller
I see it as a group of people... everybody says it'll be 1 person who rules the world. I might be wrong, yet I might be right, there can be a mistake in the interpretation, or it was right. It just doesn't sound right: 1 person rules the world... I think he (the anti-christ, or whomever) would die of a heart-attack. If he makes a mistake... its him vs. the world.
[edit on 31-1-2007 by The_unraveller]
Originally posted by eyes2see
My faith tells me the Bible is both symbolic in some parts, and literal in other parts. Many of the things Jesus said, giving to the poor/loving your neighbor as yourself for instance, are quite literal, whereas the 4 beasts of Daniel and the Beast of Revelation are rich in symbolism.
Originally posted by The_unraveller
in Revelation 17:12 "The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast."
These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by The_unraveller
I think the 200 million might be a exaggeration.
It may very well be...But a country such as China or India could march such an army very easily... Both countries are quickly reaching the 2 billion mark in population. I think India has actually surpassed China in population but I am not sure.
3 leaders refuse to submit
Originally posted by The_unraveller
I know they can easily muster a force like that (in numbers), but not all of them will want to fight. If I remember right, China had almaost 3 million soldiers. I don't know much about india, though.
And to look at it logically a 200 million man army, will be the most expensive army ever... or most under equiped army ever,
Originally posted by The_unraveller
Personally, I don't think a lot of soldiers will enlist, if another story/problem is pinned to the middle-east. All the countries will first take it with a pinch of salt.
[edit on 31-1-2007 by The_unraveller]
Originally posted by SuicideVirus
Likewise, those hoping for a "Rapture" find all kinds of justifications why they will be selected, while overlooking the most plain and obvious description in the book of those raptured as limited specifically to 144,000 Jewish male virgins - which leaves out a lot of us.
[edit on 31-1-2007 by SuicideVirus]
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by The_unraveller
Personally, I don't think a lot of soldiers will enlist, if another story/problem is pinned to the middle-east. All the countries will first take it with a pinch of salt.
[edit on 31-1-2007 by The_unraveller]
They won't have to enlist if there is conscription. They will be forced to be in the military. I personally think China is one of the biggest threats this wolrd will face in the future...So... you really can't convince me that China is just trying to "make it" like many try to say.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by SuicideVirus
Likewise, those hoping for a "Rapture" find all kinds of justifications why they will be selected, while overlooking the most plain and obvious description in the book of those raptured as limited specifically to 144,000 Jewish male virgins - which leaves out a lot of us.
[edit on 31-1-2007 by SuicideVirus]
If that is literal, then what of the gentile virgins? Also, that is not a reference to a "rapture" type event, but a reference to those that will be granted a "leadership" role in God's coming kingdom.