It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boaz1234
i mean who was i going to tell and tell the what i shot a ghost
Originally posted by Yarcofin
If it only started recently (3 calls to her house in a week), I don't think it was a ghost. So you're telling me after this all happened, you didn't bother asking the woman who the man was or why he was there?
Basically I say either
You missed.
or
The guy was REALLY REALLY high. I've seen police footage where people are on tons of drugs, and they turn into supermen where it takes 10 officers to take them down, you can pepper spray them and they'll keep on walking, etc. You could have easily shot him and he would have kept on walking if this was the case, even if it was a relatively vital shot. He could have easily ran a few blocks with a collapsed lung or something. The bullets might have gone straight through him. I'd pull them out of the wall and see if they had blood or anything. Although I would think that would leave some kind of obvious splatter on the floor as well.
Originally posted by boaz1234
I fired 3 rounds at about seven feet so i know he was hit in the chest but he kept coming,he past right through both of us and when i turned he was gone.now here is the really stupid part i found ALL three bullets in the drywall behind where he was standing.
Originally posted by whatukno
Ok from what information you gave I would have reported this... (chainge it into proper language of course)
Suspect was found in the home. I drew my wepon, ordered the suspect on the ground, Suspect did not comply. I gave a final warning to suspect. Suspect ignored final warning. I fired three rounds into the center of mass of the suspect. I must have missed the suspect. Suspect evaded capture and is on the loose.
that way you don't look crazy
The problem with lies is that the are most always uncoverd especialy in an investigation. I would just have simply stated the facts at hand and not theorised about things I could not explain. saying anything about it being a ghost (which it most likly was) would not go too far for your credibility. and saying you accedently discharged your wepon doesnt help much eather.
now with the above report you just look like a lousy shot and not a crazy person and therefore plausable denyability is created.
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
That's true, but with ghost sitings you have to look into lots of research for the subject you cant describe a ghost and make off with it. I havent seen any paranormal encounters with ghosts yet but I imagine that some places may be haunted and other places may not be haunted but definately that is a better report than the one he was going to give.
If you report a ghost you need to have more than just circumstantial evidence there to prove that it exists.
Originally posted by boaz1234
I should start off saying i have worked in law enfocement for 10 yrs. and never used my weapon.