It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
If the law was revised, then the revision is aplicable, not the original statute.
Originally posted by billybob
ditto the weaponisation bill.
ditto the patent.
ditto, 'own the weather'.
ditto your own eyeballs.
Originally posted by TJ11240
If it was something good or beneficial, wouldn't they want to take some credit for it?
Originally posted by godservant
Originally posted by TJ11240
If it was something good or beneficial, wouldn't they want to take some credit for it?
Whew! Exactly - if it is some sort of chemical AND they are not telling anyone, then it can only be something negative - period. Sure is a lot of debate with only one conclusion.
Originally posted by masterp
hasn't anyone been surprised by the fact that the sun disk looks non circular ?
Originally posted by masterp
Aside from chemtrails, hasn't anyone been surprised by the fact that the sun disk looks non circular ?
I personally would like to thank Howard Roark, Affirmative Reaction, Stuart Allsop, and Milk, among others, for their well researched, concise, and informative efforts. It's people such as these that help the ATS community rise above the blind acceptance of any and all conspiracy theories. As the ATS motto implies, most of us are here to "Deny Ignorance". That means deciding the veracity of an argument on the weight of the FACTS, (scientific and provable) either for or against it. I for one feel that the above named have given their opinions and supported them in good faith with scientific proof. Furthermore, I honestly believe that any one of them would change their opinion if faced with irrefutable proof contrary to their views.