Of Military forces, I would say the IDF. Krav Maga is to my knowledge the most efficient hand-to-hand combat training you can get. Of course, you can
add variation through factors like training-amount, how hard you train, how often you get to use it and test it against other styles or in real
combat.. etc. But by default I would say a Krav Maga E degree (I dont know how high they train IDF in Krav Maga usually) IDF soldier should be ranked
up among the top 3
all chinese military are trained by the shaolin monks. so therefore i say the chinese
Chinese military usually get training in certain styles of Kung-Fu yes (a lot of Chinese citizens train this from they are kids anyway), and a lot of
the styles are mastered my Shaolin munks, and a lot of Shaolin munks may work as self-defense trainers for Chinese military and police, but how
efficient it is in combat if you set it up against other styles I dont know. I train Hung Gar myself, which is a traditional style of southern Kung-Fu
brought down from the Shaolin ... It teaches insane resilience, endurance, pain, quick kicks (usually low kicks) and fists usually from low stances.
Very effective training and a good basis for learning speed and powerful punches and blocks, but it's not the type of martial art you choose if you
wish to learn how to fight in a year without training on application and getting experience yourself. For that you choose a pure combat oriented
self-defense style, like Krav Maga.
I know how to defend myself, I know that from experience. And training Hung Gar has offered very good grounds for learning to fight for me, even
though I don't train it for that particular reason. But that is a result of me training on how to apply what I learn to real situations, and training
against people who master styles that are usually superior to my style in realistic scenarios. By training for example Krav Maga, you will learn
efficient self-defense a lot faster than if you train most Asiatic styles without getting any real-life experience.
Most people get this wrong though. it's not as if a Kung Fu trained soldier will not kick most peoples ass very very hard. They do realize the
potential and weaknesses of their own fighting style, and will adapt their training to that.
Boxing, Muaythai(Not Kick Boxing) or just bare fist streigteners are the best forms of fighting. I dont like these karate type of ones where
you earn a stupid useless belt that does no good but out of them 'karate' type of ones, kung fu is the best out that breed but i still dont really
admire them. You know what is a belt gonna do?
Ah, yeah, Muay Thai (Thai Boxing) is a very good form of fighting training.
As for Kung Fu though... reffering to it as "that breed" is a bit wrong. Traditionally (and usually in serious clubs now days aswell) you don't
earn belts while training Kung Fu styles. The grading system is relevant to the actual meaning of Kung Fu... It's hard to translate, but it basically
means "achievement through effort". In our club we refer to Kung Fu as meaning "Time and Effort/"Suffering"/Hard work". The more time, effort,
suffering and hard work you put into the training, the stronger is your Kung Fu. The longer you have trained under the teacher (sifu) the stronger is
your Kung Fu. So, even though I might have learned more Hung Gar punches or forms than certain others in my club, if they have been training and
putting more time and effort into it than me they are still my sihing (senior/teacher/elder brother). Your Kung Fu is strengthened through time, hard
work and effort, not through graduating in new forms and earning belts.
Belts are usually just a way for people to feel they have earned something and reached a new level of achievement though. No one actually believes
their belt will defend them from anyone all by itself. And... A high degree belt in any martial art will usually tell something about a persons skill,
toughness and dedication.
[edit on 29-1-2007 by me_ofef_seraph]