latest terror message (hanmannpi.com)

Originally posted by Valhall
Did any have the original time on the First warning yesterday?

Here's what I've got worked up if the 36 25 36 is hours FROM THE TIME THE WARNING WAS ISSUED:

The time I remember was 5:03 or 5:30 one of those, but I don't know if it was a.m. or p.m., but it was Mecca Time:

First set is Mecca time, second is US Time in CST:

If it was 5:30 a.m. 11/9: (US 11:30 pm 11/8)
+36 hours is 5:30 pm 11/10: (US 11:30 am 11/10)
+25 hours is 6:30 pm 11/11: (US 12:30 pm 11/11)
+36 hours is 6:30 am 11/13: (US 12:30 am 11/13)

If it was 5:30 p.m. 11/9: (US 11:30 am 11/9)
+36 hours is 5:30 am 11/11: (US 11:30 pm 11/10)
+25 hours is 6:30 am 11/12: (US 12:30 am 11/12)
+36 hours is 6:30 pm 11/13: (US 12:30 pm 11/13)

The above is wrong! Mecca is 9 hours ahead of CST:

If it was 5:30 a.m. 11/9: (US 8:30 pm 11/8)
+36 hours is 5:30 pm 11/10: (US 8:30 am 11/10)
+25 hours is 6:30 pm 11/11: (US 9:30 am 11/11)
+36 hours is 6:30 am 11/13: (US 9:30 pm 11/12)

If it was 5:30 p.m. 11/9: (US 8:30 am 11/9)
+36 hours is 5:30 am 11/11: (US 8:30 pm 11/10)
+25 hours is 6:30 am 11/12: (US 9:30 pm 11/11)
+36 hours is 6:30 pm 11/13: (US 9:30 am 11/13)

And 10:00 p.m. Mecca time on 11/11 would have been 1:00 p.m. CST. Which was just about the time the explosions went off in Baghdad.

Now, does that mean that the 10, 11, 11 (50, 55, 55) in the second message had to do with that? If that is a major attack I have become desensitized.

no i dont think the attacks in baghdad etc last night (aus time probably still today us time) were big enough to start the terrorists on their campaign.

Attacks may signal shift in al Qaeda's strategy

CNN) -- The suicide car bombings in Saudi Arabia in May and over the past weekend indicate the al Qaeda terrorist organization has broadened its strategy, according to diplomats and analysts.

"It's quite clear to me that al Qaeda wants to take down the royal family and government of Saudi Arabia," said U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, currently traveling in the region.

click for cnn

could they be desensitising us(meaning everyone incl the sheeples) for the attack on the al-aqsa mosque??

it looks like it to me

this is from the same article

Indications of attacks
In London, the Arab weekly Al-Majalla said Tuesday it received an e-mail in which al Qaeda claimed responsibility for Saturday's bombing.

In the past, claims sent to the newspaper have been followed up on a Web site experts say is run by al Qaeda. That has not happened in this case, but a statement on the Web site the day after the Riyadh attack was titled "Preparations for this blow."

maybe it is maybe it isnt, but all indications are pointing to some large scale (and i mean LARGE scale) attack somewhere in the world over the coming days/and or weeks

[Edited on 11-11-2003 by ausconspiracies]

This truck bomb thing agains the Italian troops is scary.

www.msnbc.com...

How about this theory. Attack in Saudi ararbia aprox 25 hours later Al-Queda Takes responsiblity for the attact ( which is unusual for al-queda because they normally take credit b4 or right after teh attack) so that leaves us with 25 hours which should be commi up pretty soon and im anticipating an attack today or tomarrow. The first attack was in the "east" and the next attack will be in the "WEST"(the USA or london) i guess we will just have to wait and see

I couldn't get into a few websites tonight, so I used visualware to trace the routes.

There seems to be a major server down around Dallas Texas area.

This might be more widespread then I'm aware of. This might be the beginning of a coordinated attack.

ha i was right
anyone know what time it is in LA??

Can't seem to get to any West Coast websites. Very strange.

LA's water supply...

web.ladwp.com...

I have had intermitten failure of my websites domain names resolving thru nameservers today.

Originally posted by energy_wave
Can't seem to get to any West Coast websites. Very strange.

Can you be more specific? A site I work on (which is on the West Coast) went down this afternoon for no apparent reason. Pissin me off too as I have a bunch of changes I was in the middle of making..

Originally posted by Firebird
ha i was right
anyone know what time it is in LA??

right about what exactly???

National Park Service server is down

edcsns15.cr.usgs.gov...

e_w

You may be right! This is very odd.

And ausconspiracies...I think Firebird is saying he may be right about his theory that the east of, west of means first a hit in the mid-east, then a hit in the US.

Which kind of makes sense to me! Firebird, you may be right!

maybe they are just having server probs.

just because a few servers are down doesnt mean there has been a terror attack or anythin like that.

and thanks valhal for clearing that up for me

I can access the LA times, so there's no problem there.

I'm here in Los Angeles, a suburb slightly north at least. I haven't heard anything happening. It's all quiet here.

If the attack was more stealthy, I.E. poisining or releasing certain agents into the water supply or something similair. It could take longer than a day to start seeing or hearing of some effects. So lets not rule out a possibility. Hopefully nothing happened, but you never know anymore, these people are mighty pissed thats for sure.

maybe they are just having server probs.

just because a few servers are down doesnt mean there has been a terror attack or anythin like that.

Well, having the status of the entire LA water supply ONLINE when terrorists have also been demonstrated to use the internet isn't such a good idea, especially since this is a high-risk target. Are other high-risk targets off-line?

This may be a coordinated defensive mechanism, if so many servers are shutting off. The park service doesn't surprise me, either, since its been suggested that the california wildfires were actually set by Al Qaeda.

im not quite shure what you mean by the water supply status online?

do you mean it is controlled online or do you mean that you can check what the water supply is doing online??(i.e what water is flowing were, what levels of what are in the water etc)