It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Thats how the world works in Iraq and Afghanistan. I mean how did we spread democracy in Germany and Japan? It sure wasn't cheap in blood.
Originally posted by rich23
Well Germany and Japan started invading other countries, didn't they?
I wish someone would bring democracy to the US.
We have one, thats why nobody needs to bring one.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
You're kidding? A democracy in the USA? More an illusion of democracy. Here's a few key words why I don't think the USA is a democracy, not anymore: neo-cons, democrats, republicans, Bush, Clinton, Diebold, TV medias, Patriot Act, Military Comission Act, ect.. ect..
Originally posted by Shroomery
No friend of the current administration? Oh please.. you really have no idea do you?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
We have one, thats why nobody needs to bring one.
You're kidding? A democracy in the USA? More an illusion of democracy. Here's a few key words why I don't think the USA is a democracy, not anymore: neo-cons, democrats, republicans, Bush, Clinton, Diebold, TV medias, Patriot Act, Military Comission Act, ect.. ect..
[edit on 11-10-2006 by Vitchilo]
Originally posted by deltaboy
No I'm not kidding. What kind of democracy you were looking for? Athens style? You have the right to vote, criticize the president, right to religion, get as many guns you want, right to free speech, etc, etc, etc.
Originally posted by centurion1211
We're talking about the CNN founded and run by Ted Turner (along with Jane Fonda), right? The CNN that covers over Bush's speeches with "accidental" coverage of their news anchor going to the bathroom. The CNN that puts a red X over Cheney's face? No, you get a clue. I read and or watch CNN news every day - along with many other sources. Really, get a clue before posting ...
Originally posted by Shroomery
Well, after those 2 great examples of an undeniable bias you surely convinced me.
Originally posted by born_to_be_wired
Originally posted by deltaboy
No I'm not kidding. What kind of democracy you were looking for? Athens style? You have the right to vote, criticize the president, right to religion, get as many guns you want, right to free speech, etc, etc, etc.
excuse me, as of a few weeks ago you DO NOT have the right to criticize the president anymore (ask the guy who told Dick he doesnt agree with him on the street), and they will take your guns (or attempt to at least)
...free speech? oh you mean in a "free speech" zone in the back alley where you cant bother anyone
democracy....
ps: your reply is being recorded so watch what you say
[edit on 11-10-2006 by born_to_be_wired]
The work updates an earlier Johns Hopkins study -- that one was released just before the November 2004 presidential election. At the time, the lead researcher, Les Roberts of Hopkins, said the timing was deliberate. Many of the same researchers were involved in the latest estimate.
Originally posted by born_to_be_wired
excuse me, as of a few weeks ago you DO NOT have the right to criticize the president anymore (ask the guy who told Dick he doesnt agree with him on the street), and they will take your guns (or attempt to at least)
...free speech? oh you mean in a "free speech" zone in the back alley where you cant bother anyone
democracy....
ps: your reply is being recorded so watch what you say
Originally posted by falcon
In the start of the war with iraq I reported a news story showing 100,000 iraqi's killled in the war in Iraq and the Media called it false and tryed to discredit it. Afterwords the FBI raided the server it was on and removed the story to attempt to do damage control.
That was in 2003. Its 2006 I have no question the numbers are higher now.
Falcon
An accurate count of Iraqi deaths has been difficult to obtain, but one respected group puts its rough estimate at closer to 50,000. And at least one expert was skeptical of the new findings.
"They're almost certainly way too high," said Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic & International Studies in Washington. He criticized the way the estimate was derived and noted that the results were released shortly before the Nov. 7 elections in the United States.
"This is not analysis, this is politics," Cordesman said.