It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Originally posted by Mcphisto
Anti-muslim propaganda? You telling me that none of this is done by muslims?
So you condemn an entire religious group because of some idiots?
If you read what I wrote in full you will see that I said because of muslim extremists people like ME are guilty of being anti-muslim!
Originally posted by estar
I don't even feel like reply to this topic because its just full of hate, propaganda and dillusion. Mcphisto I see you have BNP in your signature, that party is nothing short of being a mix between Hitler and the KKK, to even come on here and post a completly utterly biased view of muslims makes me mad. Go get educated on the world and stop preaching hate and making tensions 10x as worse. BNP are a joke in the UK and you are part of that joke, who ever takes this party and there views seriously need to go back in time. Im suprised you even post on a open forum such as this, as your views seem to be stuck back in the stone ages.
I wish people start treating people as Individuals, race, colour, religion shouldn't even come into question. If there a terrorist there a terrorist nothing more nothing less. People didn't go round calling the IRA, catholic terrorists did they?
[edit on 8-10-2006 by estar]
[edit on 8-10-2006 by estar]
A spokesman for letting agency Kings, who are marketing the property, said: “It was an isolated case of vandalism. We do not know the reasons behind it.”
Terms And Conditions Of Use
1b.) Profanity: You will not use profanity in our forums, and will neither post with language or content that is obscene, sexually oriented, or sexually suggestive nor link to sites that contain such content.
Terms And Conditions Of Use
1b.) Profanity: You will not use profanity in our forums, and will neither post with language or content that is obscene, sexually oriented, or sexually suggestive nor link to sites that contain such content.
Originally posted by Mcphisto
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Originally posted by Mcphisto
Anti-muslim propaganda? You telling me that none of this is done by muslims?
So you condemn an entire religious group because of some idiots?
If you read what I wrote in full you will see that I said because of muslim extremists people like ME are guilty of being anti-muslim!
Originally posted by half_minded
And while im at it.....let me educate you some more......Except Saudi and a couple other countries.....no muslim man beats his wife or forces her to wear hijab......they woman chooses to do so......if you wanna argue abt that point then come to middle east whr I live and show me a family that does it.
1) INTRODUCTION - STATUS OF THE WIFE IN ISLAM
One of the more controversial issues in Islam is the Quran’s authorization for husbands to beat disobedient wives. This is found in chapter 4, called “Women”, verse 34. Additional information on Islamic wife beating is found in Muhammad’s Traditions (Hadith), and Sira (biographical material). Many people have criticized Islam because of this harsh sanction, and many Muslims have written articles seeking ways to mollify or defend it. In review of the actual teachings of the Quran, Hadith, and Sira, Islam is rightly criticized. This command is not only a harsh way to treat one’s wife, it portrays the degraded position of married women in Islam. It will be shown from the Quran, Hadith, Sira, and other Islamic writings that this “Islamic” wife beating is physical and painful.
Please note that wife beating is not only an Islamic problem. It is a common occurrence throughout the entire world. Some cultures accept it more readily than others. However, Islam accepts the practice to an extent that Muslim societies do not see it as a problem.
Before moving on and addressing the subject of Islamic wife beating in detail, I want to pause and examine a more crucial point: the exhortation to beat the disobedient wife is not an aberration, oddity, disjointed concept, or stand alone element, in Islam’s positioning of females, rather, the command to beat disobedient wives is founded upon a woman’s subservient / secondary status in Islam. You cannot separate the issue of wife beating apart from the context of her inferior position in the marriage relationship.
To fully comprehend the issue of Islamic wife beating her position with respect to her husband must be first understood. Wife beating is allowed because of the lower position she occupies. A person with a severe virus may run a high fever. While the fever can be quite a grave problem it is actually a symptom of another sickness at work. Wife beating is a symptom of the wife’s degraded status in Islam. Beyond the right of husbands to beat their disobedient wives, there is a deeper, more pernicious, disease at work. Wife beating is merely the bad fruit of a bad root. Once this element is understood the rationale behind Muhammad’s command to beat disobedient wives comes into focus and fits in its proper place.
When I first began to study the topic, I did not realize that an Islamic marriage is not equivalent to a Christian marriage. Its rules, roles, and requirements are quite different. In a Christian marriage, the husband is given the role as head of the household, and the wife is expected to submit to the husband’s leadership. However, she is his equal in terms of social and religious status; she is not inferior to him. In Islam, the husband is the custodian of his wife. She is considered to be in-between slave and free. The woman is managed and controlled. The relationship between a married woman and her husband is similar to the relationship between parents and children. Parents have a responsible custody of their children and expect their obedience. When children are disobedient they are disciplined and sometimes spanked. Muhammad’s viewpoint of women was that they lack self-control, and thus for their own good, and societies’ good, they must be subordinate to their husbands. They must obey. Although an adult women is more mature and capable than a child she is still not equal to a man; thus is subject to him. Islam teaches that men are superior to women. When a man gives his bride a dowry, he is accredited the right to manage his wife. By accepting his dowry, a woman is giving her husband the right to her regulation.
I am not saying that the wife is the husband’s slave. Her status is above that of a slave. Muhammad urged his followers to treat their wives well. He did not want to see them beaten without cause. He wanted good marriage relationships between husband and wife. However, his desires for happy marriages and kind treatment do not mitigate the authority he gave men over women or the position he ascribed to women. In Islamic thought, in Muhammad’s thought, the wife is not considered the husband’s equal, rather, she is an inferior, subordinate partner, who is to be treated gently and kindly, but still under the man’s authority. While the Muslim husband may love and respect his wife and treat her with great kindness, the foundational principles of their marriage remain. If she persists in disobedience to his wishes he has the right, even the responsibility, to beat her, to bring her into submission once again, and re-establish a “happy” marriage.
Originally posted by WatcheR1990
Muslims try to change the way countrys are run.... like wtf do they want a muslim only day out at alton towers ¬_¬
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Unfortunately there is no way to fight Radical Islam through the military. It has to be through education. Western culture and ideals brought to the Middle East and anywhere else.
www.thesun.co.uk...
On Wednesday a Muslim-run dairy was firebombed.
Originally posted by Nygdan
From the same article as in the OP:
www.thesun.co.uk...
On Wednesday a Muslim-run dairy was firebombed.
Muslims have it far too easy in the UK eh? By making things difficult for muslims there will be less aggitation from muslims???
The UK hasn't had riots on the scale that France and Germany have had because British culture has been able to more or less assimilate and accept muslims. Firebombing muslim businesses or 'rounding them up' ain't going to help.
Originally posted by Strangerous
etc
etc
Overall I'm very worried that our tradition of tolerance and successful integration are being destroyed on a daily basis.
Originally posted by Mezzanine
You think that Muslims anywhere have it easy?
Muslims in western countries are openly discriminated against and often times treated as a suspected terrorist (and there is no proving otherwise).
The very fact that you're buying into anti Muslim propaganda is what’s really concerning about this thread.