It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
quote:
An example of this would be your own handwriting, your own signature.
Your signature is not consistent, is it?
Do you sign your name consistently when your in a real good mood as compared to when you are in a real bad mood?
Originally posted by Vector J:
Nope, it changes a lot, and I have no doubt that it depends on current state of mind. But again, how can you interpret stuff from it if you are unaware of my state of mind at the time? Is the encoding just a personal record for my own mind of what its intentions etc are? Because surely no other mind could understand it, not knowing my mind state when I wrote it. Or are some interpretations constant?
:
quote:
It is not my intention to prove this to you.
That is a shame, however being quite a conceptual point I imagine you would agree that this cannot be proved, only strongly implied, which I believe you are yet to do.
quote:
I do not feel compelled to do so, as i think it would be wrong.
How so?
Originally posted by a1ex
What about Palindromes?
Examples:
Madam
Noon
Radar
Boob
Rotor
Level
Can you find Subconcious influcence in the words above?
This is what I saw in the word google...what do you see?
let us break down the following phrase, following the constant rules listed above, as requested by members who have contributed to this thread.
read is cross you owe
*1)as promised, i will break each word/syllable down to its most simple form, like the mind of a child would think:
READ : (*the a is not pronounced, it makes no sound, remove it.)
read = red
......
is = is
.......
cross = (*again i will simplify as a child would, so: "+" , or lower class T, T = "t")
cross = + or t
.......
you = (*simplify, like the mind of a child, phonetically, so: you = "U" or "u")
you = u
.......
Owe = (* again, simplify. Owe = letter "O" or "o")
owe = o
.......
Lets add them back together:
red is t u o
2) as promised i will now simply reverse the sequence of letters:
red is t u o
turns into:
o u t is der
3) as promised i will now add them together and see if they spell any other word in the english language:
outsider
............................
Following 3 simple rules i have we have gone from:Read is cross you owe
to ...
Outsider
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
low tube
lo tub
reverse......
Originally posted by La Balance
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
low tube
lo tub
reverse......
gold.
Hey Eso Teacher, I would like your input on this one:
beautiful
be - u - ta - ful
reverse..
luf at u eb
laugh at you E.B. ?
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
It is i who am wrong for having provoked fear in your mind, not yours.
Originally posted by La Balance
Wow. Thanks for the reply. Very interesting ..
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
It is i who am wrong for having provoked fear in your mind, not yours.
Teacher, I think this passage depicts your issue welll. We can be scared of changing our perception of something. It can be about anything.. and it's like getting out of your confort zone?
Does anybody have any tips on widening someone's "confort zone" ? Someone posted a bit ago that some things could not be thought, but discovered. So my version of the question is How to promote self discovery (growth?) without inducing fear?
How to promote self discovery (growth?) without inducing fear?
How to promote self discovery (growth?) without inducing fear?
Originally posted by:tunin
Now I'm wondering, does this apply only into the english language?
And maybe, if we apply these methods into the original scriptures of bible we could find something relevant.
Originally posted by Athenion
I hate to be the one to burst the bubble here, but most of your "subliminal" messages require some pretty rediculous manipulation and stretches of logic to function. For example, saying a Y upside down is an H? That's just silly. What does that have to do with the rest of the word?
Techsnow
Is it because of the language that your examples are possible?
Or are you right, that the creation of the English language is a result of hundreds of years of subconscious programing that we were unaware of?
Originally posted by Vector J
Show me this 'working' in other languages.
Originally posted by La Balance
You can't make a person discover anything else if they're already struggling internally with something else.
Dying is our WHY?
Di our why
di r y
di ar y
diary.
The famous quote "You can't handle the truth" seems to have had some biological reasoning.
" Its in the way that you use it, it comes, and it goes"
--- Eric Clapton
Anyways, time to take the ramp back to the thread:
television
tele vision
reversed
elet noisiv
elite noise I.V.
If you become an idol worshipper, and you seek with all disregard for life the relic of your faith, not unlike the Knight Templars, you may become a killer.
relic
ciler
killer
Do have the courage to cure rage within you?
Do have the courage to cure rage within you?
hiroglifics
hi rogue glyph (letters) fix (repair)
Hello Rogue. Fix the glyphs of your language.
hir = higher / or hire (to employ)
o = Oh
g = god (abbreviated form, as it is not right to use his name in vain)
lif = life
fics = fix
from: HYROGLYPHICS
to: Hire Higher Oh God, life fix (or fix life?)
Area 51
Step #1: Phonetically, like the mind of a child would spell, according to the rules of english, devoid of contridictions:
areu fifte wun
Step #2: Reverse the sequence:
nuw = (new/knew) we et fif you er (ear / hear) a
knew new we e.t. *fif (if? or fifth) you hear/ear a.
hear a?
a stands for what? The alpha, perhaps?
since the sequence fails to provide me with a definitive answer, i must ask myself what the "a" at the end stands for.
What is the most word that begins with "a", something that encompasses everything i can think of?
through the "law of association", the most powerfull and all encompassing word i can think of that begins with the letter "a" is:
all.
So from "area 51", i get:
knew new we e.t. *fif (if? or fifth) you hear/ear a.
Now if i look at the findings as they are and put them into the shortest sentence i can think of, the results are:
knew something new, we E.T., *fifth if you hear with your ear all.
Originally posted by grafixone
no offense, but all this sounds like bullcrap to me..
maybe not the whole sublimal language thread, but the examples you guys are giving....
quite pointless....