posted on Nov, 8 2007 @ 06:42 PM
Several ATS members in this thread suggest that a tool be made available for members to amplify their disagreement with individual posts on a thread.
My opinion on that topic is that internet discussion boards, and to some extent ATS as well, already have enough tactics that can potentially be used
purely to punish dissent. I therefore ask that we not be given more tools to accomplish that.
I support the right of ATS participants to propose novel concepts that meet with the ATS Terms and Conditions. Those terms and conditions go beyond
the concept of a popularity contest in order to encourage the reporting of new facts, new ideas, and different points of view, especially those backed
up by supporting data.
The trick about the preferred learning styles of ATS members is that human beings have different patterns in learning styles. Howard Gardner of
Harvard University, for instance, proposed 7 radically different learning styles. So what helps ATS members as a whole with learning is a diversity
of approaches. Vive le difference!
On another subject, I request that an ATS survey during the next 12 months be conducted to find out the ethnolinguistic statistics on ATS members.
Many internet discussion boards, for instance, feature an "assumed whiteness" for all members. I myself am Caucasian, but I feel comfortable
disclosing my ethnicity when I feel that that aspect of my identity is crucial to the topic of a particular thread. Not all ATS members see the need
for this disclosure, however. So this disagreement points to the need for further information-gathering, some day, some way. BTW, thank you
Obi-Wans of the ATS Board for zero tolerance of hate speech.
[edit on 11/8/2007 by Uphill]