It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by verymad
i think that if england went agaisnt the usa in this war the usa would take one hell of a beating because of us. We probably woudnt beat you unless we had some really good plan but we would really hurt you
Originally posted by shortmanx5
Stop comparing everything to vietman, everyone said thats what iraq is. You cant compare when 3,000 died now and over 50,000 in vietman. We would not lose 50,000 troops if you invaded iran. Get that in your head, you are always making the usa out to be weaker than it is. Its pretty clear iran wouldnt stand a chance .
Originally posted by Daedalus3
I do not think the 'US troop losses' due to secondary bio-chem fallout would be very high because the the US army is one of the leaders in NBC protection gear and I believe that the deployments in Iraq would have been given special training(and gear) for the same considering the relevance of the region.
The civilian losses would be catastrophic however..100s of thousands would die..genocide.
This would lead to much internal turmoil within Iran itself, possibly a berakdown in military ranks and thus making it easier for a now infinitely enraged west(and the rest of the world: Russia/China incld) to swiftly decapitate the regime and seize all NBC assets.. Infact I believe the Russians would be the first to go in and do that.
Originally posted by manson_322
russians and chinese would do nothing and will sit and watch and ,so will india , and if west nukes Iran, it will ultimately undoing of the west , because then every country will begin its nuclear weapons program fearing that USA is a becoming a threat to the world , which it already is being considered a threat by many nations , in fact russia will speed up its rearmament process
Originally posted by Daedalus3
I said that , if Iran uses biochem weapons on Iraq(US), I think the Russians will carry out blitzkreig paratroop/spec ops over Iran to seize control of all bio-chem assets.
Once that is done, Russian 'peacekeeper' heavy armory and air support can roll in the prevent any American 'misadventures'.
It will serve the purpose of keeping the US out of Iran, and it will do wonders for international public relations.
China(Or India) would not be able to execute the same operation(s) because they do not have the logistics to do so in that area.
India also lacks the political will. In any case both(India and China) would be inclined to support this Russian move for a multitude of reasons.
Finally Iran itself would not 'mind' partial Russian control, because it would do two things:
1) Save Iran from any immediate strategic/tactical assault from the US.
2) Keep the infidel Americans/West out of Iran.
3)The Russians would be perceived to 'return' control back to the same regime in sometime..this will most likely be 'under-the-table'.
Originally posted by mad scientist
LOL and the iranians would let this happen, not a chance.
You think Iraq was bad for the US, Russia being in Iran would be 10 mes worse, just look at all te problems they had trying to subdue tiny Chechnya.
LOL, right fantasy. Completely unrealistic. Iranians not minding Russian control
Originally posted by shortmanx5
No navy would get close enough to the usa to invade or anything like that. Worlds largest navy's #1. Usa navy, #2. usa reserve navy,#3. British navy,#4. Usa coast guard. Its well known the in any navy battle the usa is favored to come out on top by a lot. Also dont count on irans navy getting out of port let alone close enough to threaten a carrier. When our coast guard is bigger than most other navies, that should be embarrasing for other countries. And as for bombers the b-52s wouldnt have to enter the other countries airspace thats why we have stand off weapons like cruise missiles that can be launched from the plane. And most other countries dont have heavy bombers, expect russia but dont count on those all flying. Most of countries only have fighter/bombers. The war would never even reach usa soil, like most other wars we have fought. We keep a lot of planes in the desert jsut incase we have another world war. And the countries that boarder us would be no problem they would most likely be on our side. But is they werrent i dont predict mexico or canada putting up a fight.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Originally posted by Daedalus3
You think Iraq was bad for the US, Russia being in Iran would be 10 mes worse, just look at all te problems they had trying to subdue tiny Chechnya.
What happend in Chechnya was delibarate by the Yeltsen Gov, Yeltsen helped arm the Chechnians and prolonged the war, why do you think all of a sudden Russia has pretty much defeated the rebels?
Finally Iran itself would not 'mind' partial Russian control, because it would do two things: