It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tommytrouble
dperry,
I'm I the only stupid one around here??????????? I mean we do live under a Democracy no???????????
Well let's take a gander at the meaning of Democracy...shall we.
Ummmmmmm.........Looks like it means "The people Rule"......or maybe I'm just misreading it??????
en.wikipedia.org...
Well, then why, may I ask, are we still in Iraq when the VAST MAJORITY of people would rather we not be in Iraq??? I do believe it's because George W. said..............I DON"T CARE WHAT OTHER PEOPLE THINK WE WILL BE IN IRAQ UNTIL I LEAVE OFFICE! UMMMMMMMMMMMM..................sounds like.......looks like...........walks like........smells like........ a dictatorship to me.
Are Dictators Impeachable?
Or maybe it's just me.
And don't give me that Congress OK'd this crap! Congress OK'd taking out Sadam NOT occupying a foreign sovereign country. I for one believe the real problem is that George W. doesn't know the meaning of foreign sovereign.
At least his father had way more brains and knew better than to even think about going into Iraq.he knew it was going to be a never ending rats nest. I mean "Come on" do you think we are going to win a Holy War with the guys that invented Holy Wars thousands of years before the United States even existed!!!! You'd have a better chance knocking out Mike Tyson LMAO.
TommyTrouble
Originally posted by ceci2006
dperry,
I am very sorry you feel that way. But I've learned that like terrorists, Bush supporters are not to be negotiated with. What good will it do? There is already enough evidence out there that proves that "something untoward" is happening in government. And if I did find something to try and convince you of that, you'd still find it laughable. Not all the indictments that happened during the six years of the Bush Adminstration will make you change your mind.
Until then, keep up the "Four legs good, two legs bad" mentality. It will serve you well in the coming days.
[edit on 23-4-2006 by ceci2006]
Originally posted by dperry4930
Wow, most of the posts between this and my last illustrate exactly the point I made before. A lof bluster about what Bush supposedly did wrong, and not a single bit of actual wrong-doing. The FISA court judges themselves do not think anything specifially wrong was commited. So try again on that one. And again with the myth of Florida/Ohio.
And as usual, as the thread gets rolling, even more over the top crazies come out talking about death penalties and such.
Like I alluded to before, this is a simple case of revenge on an unpopular Republican President commited by the ...
A federal judge has resigned from the court that oversees government surveillance in intelligence cases in protest of President Bush's secret authorization of a domestic spying program, according to two sources.
U.S. District Judge James Robertson, one of 11 members of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, sent a letter to Chief Justice John D. Roberts Jr. late Monday notifying him of his resignation without providing an explanation.
Two associates familiar with his decision said yesterday that Robertson privately expressed deep concern that the warrantless surveillance program authorized by the president in 2001 was legally questionable and may have tainted the FISA court's work.
www.dailykos.com...
Originally posted by BaastetNoir
I've been asking that myself for a while.
What are the gorunds for the impeachement ? You can't impeach a man based on the fact that you don't like the War HE AND THE CONGRESS agreed on... unless you impeach the members of the congress that agreed with him... right ? If on has to take a fall, than all of those who agreed with himshould take the fall to.. and that would include n99% of the democrats that are calling for the impeachement...taqlking about a joke !
Originally posted by dperry4930
Thanks anyway. I am still looking forward to some actual evidence of malfeasance.
dperry
Originally posted by seattlelaw
Originally posted by dperry4930
Wow, most of the posts between this and my last illustrate exactly the point I made before. A lof bluster about what Bush supposedly did wrong, and not a single bit of actual wrong-doing. The FISA court judges themselves do not think anything specifially wrong was commited. So try again on that one. And again with the myth of Florida/Ohio.
And as usual, as the thread gets rolling, even more over the top crazies come out talking about death penalties and such.
Like I alluded to before, this is a simple case of revenge on an unpopular Republican President commited by the ...
blah, blah, blah ... wind bag ... blah, blah, blah ...
But, in the real world ...
A federal judge ...
Thanks for illustrating my point. Nice on the personal attack.
On another note, I wonder why this article apparently isn't on dailyKOS, otherwise I am sure you would have found it... www.washtimes.com...
And if I can illustrate the difference in our two sources, yours was back in December, and the info comes from 'associates familiar with his decision' whereas mine is from less than a month ago, and these judges were on record. Am I saying that they are 100% sure of Bush's actions? No, they wavered a bit, but they stated pretty firmly that 'a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not override the president's constitutional authority to spy on suspected international agents under executive order. '
How else would you have me read that statement?
Would you like to come up with something else, or are you going to claim victory somehow?
dperry
Originally posted by dperry4930
Would you like to come up with something else, or are you going to claim victory somehow?
dperry
Originally posted by tommytrouble
dperry
Oh yeah forgot lol................please don't get me started on the whole Iraq deal.
...
We need to do things smarter not harder. Like in Iran now........ we need to go in there and set-up Mc Donald's and Starbucks and Crispy Creme and the Gap and Walmart, the Hilton then get QVC and Desperate Housewives and American Idol on their TV's and eBay on there computers ....etc....etc.... Then they will be us! .................. then we can go on vacation there and all will be well with the world
TommyTrouble
[edit on 23-4-2006 by tommytrouble]
Originally posted by dperry4930
Of course, Iraq never complied, the invasion happened, and no WMD in any substantial amount have been found. What has always bothered me the most, why would Saddam, when faced with his own demise, not finally admit exactly what he had and where it went? Hans Blix himself (hardley a US apologist) stated that Iraq was not in compliance. If Saddam had destroyed his stocks of chem/bio and his nuke program, why act like he still had them?
The 1991 Persian Gulf War and subsequent U.N. inspections destroyed Iraq's illicit weapons capability and, for the most part, Saddam Hussein did not try to rebuild it, according to an extensive report by the chief U.S. weapons inspector in Iraq that contradicts nearly every prewar assertion made by top administration officials about Iraq.
Originally posted by seattlelaw
The loss of civility in political discourse was mastered by the Rovian politicians who surfaced during the "Republican Revolution" and has continued unabated as pushed by Rove and Delay, et al, and enforced by FOX and the other parroting mouth-pieces of the current administration.
To imply that comparing the Reichstag like tactics of Bush et al to Hitler indicates a loss of civility is to demean the vast and continuing violent loss and irreperable damaging of innocent life which their Hitleresque deceptions have led to. It is, in a word, bourgeoisie.